Agent skill · Audited from source
Thinking First Principles
skill · tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skillsMIT licenceAudited 28 Oct 2026 · source 9a5557e61022
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 9a5557e61022 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Thinking First Principles (tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills)”. Retrieved 28 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/tjboudreaux/thinking-first-principles
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 28 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 9a5557e61022 · 28 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- Publishertjboudreaux GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source foldertjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills/skills/thinking-first-principlesThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceMITAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict9a5557e61022A new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 81 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.
---
name: thinking-first-principles
description: When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# First Principles
Strip assumed constraints to independently supported primitives, then rebuild. Escape analogy when convention fails or looks artificially expensive.
## When to Use
- A constraint is treated as fixed ("too expensive," "impossible," "always done this way") without independent support.
- Convention or analogy has failed, stalled, or only yields weak incremental variants.
- Greenfield design where industry defaults may smuggle false requirements.
- Cost or feasibility claims rest on pricing, precedent, or authority rather than physics, math, or measured need.
## When NOT to Use
- The constraint is verified physics, hard regulation, or measured capacity → accept it and optimize within it.
- A proven standard library, protocol, or known-good pattern already fits → use it; do not re-derive.
- Time-critical incidents → act on the most likely cause first; reserve first-principles rebuild for post-incident redesign.
- Incremental polish of a working system with no false-constraint signal → skip.
## Procedure
1. **State the problem and claimed constraints.** List every limit treated as fixed (cost, scale, stack, process, "must use X").
2. **Classify each constraint.** Tag as `physics/math`, `regulation/contract`, `measured fact`, or `convention/analogy/authority`. Keep only the first three as binding unless evidence upgrades a convention.
3. **Decompose to primitives.** Required inputs, conservation/complexity bounds, true non-negotiables. Demand independent support (measurement, derivation, primary requirement)—not vendor pricing or competitor precedent.
4. **Discard unsupported assumptions.** For each convention tag, state a falsifier. Drop or renegotiate anything lacking support.
5. **Rebuild from remaining primitives only.** Simplest solution that satisfies binding constraints and ignores artificial ones. Prefer commodity inputs and fewer moving parts over analogy.
6. **Validate and stop.** Check against real physics, contracts, and measured needs. Define the cheapest kill test. Stop when a coherent rebuild plus discriminating validation exists, or when only verified hard constraints remain.
## Output
Emit a first-principles rebuild:
- `claimed_constraints`: list with classification tags
- `primitives`: independently supported truths only
- `discarded_assumptions`: conventions dropped and why
- `rebuild`: solution derived only from primitives
- `binding_residuals`: real limits that remain
- `kill_test`: cheapest check that would falsify the rebuild
## Verification
- **Independence check:** every primitive must cite measurement, derivation, or primary requirement—not precedent alone.
- **No smuggled analogy:** if the rebuild still depends on "how others do it" without a primitive, strip it.
- **Constraint honesty:** verified physics/regulation must remain; do not wish them away.
- **Over-application guard:** if a standard solution is already optimal under verified constraints, do not rebuild for novelty.
- **Stop:** one decompose → classify → rebuild → kill-test pass; do not recurse without new evidence.Excerpt, first 3,353 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 9a5557e
git clone https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills git -C cc-thinking-skills checkout 9a5557e61022
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 9a5557e61022 only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
9a5557e61022
README badge
For maintainers · shows the latest audit
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/tjboudreaux/thinking-first-principles/)
The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.
Similar skills
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
Under genuine uncertainty with no reliable forecast, inventory means, cap downside at affordable loss, act for commitments, and let goals emerge from controllable moves.
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
28 eval-informed mental models and critical-thinking skills for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Cursor, and other Agent Skills-compatible tools
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
28 eval-informed mental models and critical-thinking skills for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Cursor, and other Agent Skills-compatible tools
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
28 eval-informed mental models and critical-thinking skills for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Cursor, and other Agent Skills-compatible tools
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
28 eval-informed mental models and critical-thinking skills for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Cursor, and other Agent Skills-compatible tools
Add this badge to your README
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/tjboudreaux/thinking-first-principles/)
<a href="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/tjboudreaux/thinking-first-principles/"><img src="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/tjboudreaux/thinking-first-principles/badge.svg" alt="ModelsAtlas: SAFE B"></a>
Questions about Thinking First Principles
What does the Thinking First Principles skill do?
Is Thinking First Principles safe to install?
What can Thinking First Principles access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills/tree/main/skills/think — the audited source at commit 9a5557e61022 and every finding aboveObserved · 28 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Thinking First Principles skill do?
- Is Thinking First Principles safe to install?
- What can Thinking First Principles access on my machine?