Agent skill · Audited from source
Fedramp
skill · Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-ComplianceMIT licenceAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 7a840ef8562c
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 7a840ef8562c and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for…
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Fedramp (Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/sushegaad/fedramp
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 1 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (1)
INFOPrompt injectionprompt.credential_read · references/control-families.md:98
**Common findings:** MFA not enforced on all remote access; legacy password rotation policies inconsistent with NIST 800-63B; PIV/CAC not supported on High baseline without documented compensating con
- Why
- asks the agent to read credentials
- Fix
- —
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 7a840ef8562c · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- PublisherSushegaad GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderSushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance/plugins/fedramp/skills/fedrampThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceMITAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict7a840ef8562cA new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 4 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for…
--- name: fedramp description: > Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP Certification Classes (A, B, C, D — new baseline labels: A = pilot/transitional, B = LI-SaaS/Low, C = Moderate, D = High, per NTC-0004), FedRAMP 20x (now the primary authorization pathway), OSCAL mandate (September 2026), 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. FedRAMP Ready retired July 28, 2026 (Legacy FedRAMP Ready). When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring. --- # FedRAMP Certification Skill > **Last verified:** 2026-10-03 A comprehensive guide for helping users navigate FedRAMP authorization — from initial readiness through ATO and ongoing continuous monitoring. ## Quick Reference: What Does the User Need? Identify the user's goal and jump to the appropriate section: | User Goal | Go To | |---|---| | "Are we ready for FedRAMP?" / gap assessment | → [Readiness & Gap Assessment](#1-readiness--gap-assessment) | | Writing SSP, POA&M, SAR, SAP, or other docs | → [ATO Documentation](#2-ato-documentation) | | "Which controls apply to us?" / control mapping | → [NIST 800-53 Control Mapping](#3-nist-800-53-control-mapping) | | Cloud architecture / AWS/Azure/GCP config | → [Architecture Guidance](#4-architecture-guidance) | | Already authorized, ongoing compliance | → [Continuous Monitoring](#5-continuous-monitoring) | --- ## Current FedRAMP State (as of August 2026 — CR26) > ⚠️ **CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026)**: FedRAMP has restructured its authorization framework. FIPS 199-based baseline labels (Low/Moderate/High/LI-SaaS) are replaced with **Certification Classes A–D** (per notice NTC-0004; CR26 rules valid through December 31, 2028). Class labels change the *names* of the baselines, not their requirements. CSPs already authorized under the old labels retain their authorization through a transition period in which old and new labels are linked. - **Baseline**: NIST SP 800-53 **Rev 5** (fully in effect) - **Control counts** (Rev 5): Low ≈ 156, Moderate = 323, High = 421 (legacy references; CR26 class-based counts being published by PMO) - **CR26 Certification Classes** (official mapping, NTC-0004): **A** = new pilot/transitional baseline (entry via external frameworks such as SOC 2 Type II through Program Certification; holders have a 2-year window to obtain B/C/D), **B** = current **LI-SaaS + Low** baselines, **C** = current **Moderate** baseline (majority of federal deployments, incl. CUI), **D** = current **High** baseline. - **FedRAMP 20x**: Now the **primary authorization pathway** — continuous authorization built on **Key Security Indicators (KSIs)**, machine-readable evidence, modular API-driven submissions, and automated validation. Traditional SSP/SAP/SAR templates remain for legacy paths. - **CR26 status**: finalized **June 25, 2026**; optional early adoption since **July 4, 2026**; **mandatory January 1, 2027**. - **Legacy FedRAMP Ready**: the Ready designation was retired/relabeled **Legacy FedRAMP Ready on July 28, 2026** — no new submissions. Rev5 Ready holders must convert by the later of their annual-assessment expiration or **November 17, 2026**; the status disappears entirely **December 31, 2027**. - **Certification Class pipelines**: **Class A open since August 3, 2026**; Classes **B/C open August 31, 2026**; Class D pilot expected late 2026 with a formal option in early 2027. - **Rev5 wind-down**: new Rev5 applications are not accepted after **June 11, 2027**; Rev5 sunsets **December 31, 2028**. - **JAB P-ATO**: Fully suspended; FedRAMP PMO is the sole authorization body. - **Machine-readable mandate (RFC-0024/NOTICE-0009, operationalized in CR26)** — applies to the **Rev5 process only, explicitly NOT to FedRAMP 20x**: **since 2PM ET September 30, 2026 (now in force)**, NEW Rev5 initial-certification packages must be machine-readable with **no grace period** (including packages already In Process for agency authorization) [LMR-GEN-ICR]; existing Rev5-certified providers must submit a full machine-readable package at **each annual assessment completed after that date** [LMR-GEN-OAR]. Approved formats: **NIST OSCAL, or any public-domain standardized format that 5+ certified CSPs agree to maintain** (FedRAMP-validated); CR26 JSON schemas and a validator are published. Human-readable versions must still be produced on request. Non-compliance: public notification until **2PM ET September 30, 2027**, then **certification revocation**. - **Security Inbox**: All authorized CSPs must maintain a dedicated Security Inbox (no CAPTCHAs or barriers) for urgent vulnerability directives — effective January 5, 2026. - **Key templates updated**: SSP, SAR, SAP, POA&M, CIS/CRM, IIW, ISCP — all updated to align with Rev 5 (Dec 2024 releases). --- ## 1. Readiness & Gap Assessment ### Approach 1. **Clarify scope** — Ask the user: What is the CSO (Cloud Service Offering)? IaaS/PaaS/SaaS? Target Certification Class under CR26? 2. **Identify authorization path** — FedRAMP 20x (primary, preferred) vs. legacy Agency Authorization package (still available for complex systems during CR26 transition) 3. **Run through the readiness checklist** — See `references/readiness-checklist.md` 4. **Surface gaps** — Map current state to required controls; flag missing documentation, unimplemented controls, and architectural deficiencies 5. **Prioritize** — Group gaps by: (a) blockers for readiness review, (b) items addressable before 3PAO assessment, (c) POA&M candida
Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 7a840ef
git clone https://github.com/Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance git -C Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance checkout 7a840ef8562c
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 7a840ef8562c only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
7a840ef8562c
Similar skills
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance
Expert CMMC 2.0 (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) advisor for US defense contractors and subcontractors in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). Use this skill whenever a user asks about CMMC 2.0, CMMC Level 1,…
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance
Expert CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about CSRD, European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), double materiality…
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance
Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT…
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance
Expert India Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about the DPDPA, DPDP Act, DPDP Rules 2025, India data privacy law, Data Fiduciary obligations,…
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance
Export Administration Regulations (EAR, 15 CFR Parts 730-774) compliance advisor — ECCN classification across all 10 CCL categories and 5 product groups (A-E), EAR99 determination, jurisdiction analysis (EAR vs ITAR…
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III…
Questions about Fedramp
What does the Fedramp skill do?
Is Fedramp safe to install?
What can Fedramp access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Complianc — the audited source at commit 7a840ef8562c and every finding aboveObserved · 14 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Fedramp skill do?
- Is Fedramp safe to install?
- What can Fedramp access on my machine?