feedback-mastery

What the source does

• FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
• NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
• ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
• DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
• SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

CLAUDE.md

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 28aecfe29fbf · 31 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

• Publishersoftaworks GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
• Source foldersoftaworks/agent-toolkit/skills/feedback-masteryThe exact folder we audited
• LicenceMITAs the repository states it
• Commit pinned for this verdict28aecfe29fbfA new audit runs when the source changes
• Repository statusNot archivedLast push 239 days ago
• Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

Its description: Navigate difficult conversations and deliver constructive feedback using structured frameworks. Covers the Preparation-Delivery-Follow-up model and Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI) feedback technique. Use when preparing…

---
name: feedback-mastery
description: Navigate difficult conversations and deliver constructive feedback using structured frameworks. Covers the Preparation-Delivery-Follow-up model and Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI) feedback technique. Use when preparing for difficult conversations, giving feedback, or managing conflicts.
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep
---

# Feedback Conversations

## Overview

This skill provides frameworks for navigating difficult workplace conversations and delivering effective feedback. Whether you're addressing performance issues, resolving conflicts, or giving constructive feedback, these structured approaches lead to better outcomes.

**Core insight:** Research shows that employees who approach difficult conversations with preparation and a clear framework are **60% more likely to reach a positive resolution** than those who engage without a plan.

## When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

- Preparing to give feedback to a colleague or direct report
- Addressing performance issues or missed expectations
- Navigating conflict between team members
- Having 1:1 conversations about sensitive topics
- Receiving feedback and wanting to respond constructively
- Managing expectations with stakeholders

**Keywords**: feedback, difficult conversation, 1:1, one-on-one, performance, conflict, expectations, behavior, confrontation

## Core Frameworks

### The Preparation-Delivery-Follow-up Model

A three-part structure for difficult conversations:

| Phase | Focus | Key Questions |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Preparation** | Understand the issue, define goals, manage emotions | What's the problem? What outcome do I want? Am I calm? |
| **Delivery** | Open neutrally, use facts not blame, encourage dialogue | How do I start? What evidence do I have? How do I involve them? |
| **Follow-up** | Document actions, set check-ins, provide support | What did we agree to? When will we check in? How do I support? |

### The SBI Feedback Model

**Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI)** structures feedback to be specific, objective, and actionable:

| Component | Description | Example |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Situation** | Describe the specific context | "During yesterday's code review..." |
| **Behavior** | State the observable action (not interpretation) | "...you interrupted Sarah three times while she was explaining her approach..." |
| **Impact** | Explain the effect on team/project/person | "...which made her hesitate to share ideas and slowed down our discussion." |

**Why it works:** SBI removes assumptions and focuses on observable facts, reducing defensiveness.

## Preparation Phase

### Step 1: Understand the Issue

Ask yourself:

- **What exactly is the problem?** (Be specific, not vague)
- **How does it impact the team, project, or company?**
- **Have I gathered all relevant facts?**
- **Is this a pattern or a one-time event?**

### Step 2: Define Your Goals

Before the conversation, clarify what you're seeking:

| Goal Type | Example |
| --- | --- |
| Behavior change | "I want them to submit code reviews on time" |
| Mutual understanding | "I want to understand what's blocking them" |
| Expectation setting | "I want to clarify what 'done' means for features" |
| Problem solving | "I want to find a solution together" |

**Tip:** Use if-then statements to clarify stakes:
> "If this behavior continues, then the project timeline will suffer, leading to missed deliverables."

### Step 3: Manage Your Emotions

High emotional intensity reduces cognitive processing by 30%. Before the conversation:

- [ ] Am I calm and in control?
- [ ] Have I separated facts from personal frustrations?
- [ ] Have I considered their perspective?
- [ ] Can I present this without accusation?

**Reframing technique:**

| Accusatory | Constructive |
| --- | --- |
| "You always miss deadlines and it slows everyone down" | "I've noticed some recent delays and want to understand any challenges you're facing" |
| "You never test your code properly" | "I've seen a few bugs slip through recently. Let's talk about our testing process" |

## Delivery Phase

### The Three-Step Delivery Formula

1. **Open with neutrality and intent**
2. **Present the issue using facts, not blame**
3. **Encourage dialogue and solutions**

### Opening Lines That Work

| Context | Opening |
| --- | --- |
| General | "I want to talk about something important to our team's success, and I'd love to hear your perspective." |
| Performance | "I've noticed some patterns I'd like to discuss. My goal is to support you, not criticize." |
| Conflict | "I sense there might be some tension, and I'd like to understand what's happening from your side." |
| Expectations | "I want to make sure we're aligned on expectations. Can we talk through how this project is going?" |

### Facts, Not Blame

| Blaming | Factual |
| --- | --- |
| "You're not committed to this project" | "I've noticed your updates have been brief in our last three meetings. Is something affecting your workload?" |
| "You don't care about code quality" | "This PR had 12 bugs caught in QA. Let's talk about what happened and how we can improve" |
| "You're always late" | "The standup started at 9:00 and you joined at 9:15 the last three days. What's going on?" |

**Key principles:**

- Use specific examples, not generalizations ("always," "never")
- Stick to observable behaviors, not assumptions about motives
- Focus on impact, not character

### Encouraging Dialogue

After stating your observation, shift to collaboration:

| Situation | Dialogue Prompt |
| --- | --- |
| Understanding barriers | "What's been challenging about this?" |
| Seeking their view | "How do you see the situation?" |
| Finding solutions | "What would help you succeed here?" |
| Checking alignment | "Does this match your understanding of what happened?" |

## Follow-up Phase

Even successful conversations need follow-through to create lasting change.

### Follow-up Checklist

- [ ] **Document agreed-upon acti

Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

git clone https://github.com/softaworks/agent-toolkit
git -C agent-toolkit checkout 28aecfe29fbf

Works in

1. 2026-10-31
   ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

   first audit · source 28aecfe29fbf

Questions about feedback-mastery

• github.com/softaworks/agent-toolkit/tree/main/skills/feedback-ma — the audited source at commit 28aecfe29fbf and every finding aboveObserved · 31 Oct 2026

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology