Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Enrich

skill · sharpdeveye/maestroMIT licenceAudited 19 Oct 2026 · source 4e163a7a8095

★ 591pushed 173 days agoversion 2.0.0
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 19 Oct 2026 · 4e163a7
591repo stars · whole sharpdeveye/maestro

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 4e163a7a8095 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Use when the agent needs access to information beyond its training data — knowledge sources, RAG pipelines, or grounding data.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Enrich (sharpdeveye/maestro)”. Retrieved 19 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/sharpdeveye/enrich

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 19 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 4e163a7a8095 · 19 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publishersharpdeveye GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source foldersharpdeveye/maestro/source/skills/enrichThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceMITAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict4e163a7a8095A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 173 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Use when the agent needs access to information beyond its training data — knowledge sources, RAG pipelines, or grounding data.

---
name: enrich
description: "Use when the agent needs access to information beyond its training data — knowledge sources, RAG pipelines, or grounding data."
argument-hint: "[knowledge domain or source]"
category: enhancement
version: 2.0.0
user-invocable: true
---

## MANDATORY PREPARATION

Invoke /agent-workflow — it contains workflow principles, anti-patterns, and the **Context Gathering Protocol**. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no workflow context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-maestro first.
Consult the knowledge-systems reference in the agent-workflow skill for RAG architecture, chunking strategies, and retrieval patterns.

---

Add knowledge sources to ground the workflow in facts. Without grounding, agents hallucinate. With grounding, they cite sources.

### Knowledge Source Assessment

Identify what knowledge the workflow needs:

| Knowledge Type | Source | Update Frequency | Access Pattern |
|---------------|--------|-----------------|----------------|
| Domain docs | Internal docs, specs | Monthly | Semantic search |
| Code context | Codebase | Real-time | Code search |
| User data | Database, CRM | Real-time | Structured query |
| External data | APIs, web | Real-time | API call |
| Historical | Logs, past interactions | Daily | Time-range query |

### Add RAG Pipeline

For document-based knowledge (consult the knowledge-systems reference in the agent-workflow skill):

1. **Select documents**: Identify the authoritative source documents
2. **Chunk strategy**: Choose chunking based on document type (semantic > token-based)
3. **Embed**: Use appropriate embedding model for the domain
4. **Index**: Store in vector database with metadata
5. **Retrieve**: Implement hybrid search (semantic + keyword)
6. **Inject**: Add retrieved context to the prompt with source attribution

### Add Structured Data

For database-backed knowledge:

1. **Define the query interface**: Natural language → structured query
2. **Add guardrails**: Read-only access, query complexity limits
3. **Format results**: Transform raw data into context the model can use
4. **Attribute**: Include data source and freshness in the context

### Add Real-Time Data

For live information:

1. **Identify APIs**: What external services provide the needed data
2. **Cache strategy**: How often does the data change? Cache accordingly
3. **Fallback**: What happens when the API is down?
4. **Attribution**: Include data timestamp and source

### Enrichment Checklist

- [ ] Every knowledge source has attribution (source, date, confidence)
- [ ] Retrieval quality tested independently of generation quality
- [ ] Chunk sizes tested and optimized for the document types
- [ ] Fallbacks exist for all external knowledge sources
- [ ] Knowledge base has a refresh/update strategy
- [ ] PII is handled appropriately in knowledge sources

### Recommended Next Step

After enrichment, run `/evaluate` to test retrieval quality, or `/iterate` to set up continuous monitoring of knowledge freshness.

**NEVER**:

- Index everything without curation (garbage in = garbage out)
- Skip source attribution (hallucination without attribution is undetectable)
- Build RAG without testing retrieval quality first
- Use fixed chunk sizes for all document types
- Assume embedding similarity equals relevance

Excerpt, first 3,306 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 4e163a7

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/sharpdeveye/maestro
git -C maestro checkout 4e163a7a8095

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 4e163a7a8095 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 4e163a7a8095

Similar skills

Questions about Enrich

What does the Enrich skill do?
Workflow fluency for AI coding agents. 1 core skill · 25 commands · 7 domain references · memory layer · audit trail — works across Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Copilot, and 6 more.
Is Enrich safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Enrich access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4e163a7a8095), read on 2026-10-19. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.