Trader ExplainCAUTION
🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Overview
🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
ef7d4f0535e5OBSERVED · 2026-09-26What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: trader-explain
description: Regulator-grade feature attribution for any LSTM/Transformer signal — single-entry PageRank ranks the top-K features that drove the prediction (ADR-126 Phase 6, ADR-123 single-entry PR)
allowed-tools: Bash Read mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_retrieve mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store mcp__ruflo-sublinear__page-rank-entry
argument-hint: "<signalId> [--top-k 10] [--seed 42]"
---
Explain a trading signal by building a feature-contribution graph and running single-entry forward-push PageRank from the signal output node. Top-K ranked features are returned as a markdown table AND persisted to `trading-analysis` as a `SignedAttributionArtifact` (ADR-126 Phase 6).
**Why this skill matters:**
- EU AI Act + SEC Reg-AI guidance require interpretable model output for any algorithmic trading system that touches retail capital. This is the regulator-grade attribution path the rest of the substrate has been waiting for.
- The same call site picks up the full native-WASM PageRank from `mcp__ruflo-sublinear__page-rank-entry` once that tool is registered in the runtime — until then, the local power-iteration kernel ships in `signed-attribution.mjs` and produces the same ordering (seeded mulberry32).
Steps:
1. **Retrieve the signal** from the canonical `trading-signals` namespace (ADR-126 Phase 1 + Phase 2 lifecycle):
```text
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_retrieve({
key: "SIGNAL_ID",
namespace: "trading-signals"
})
```
The signal entry includes `modelId`, `prediction`, and the feature vector at the time of inference.
2. **Extract per-feature contribution scores** from the model:
```bash
npx neural-trader --predict --signal "$SIGNAL_ID" --explain --json
```
The expected output shape:
```ts
{
features: Array<{ name: string; contribution: number }>;
// for Transformers, also includes per-head attention co-occurrence:
attention?: Array<{ head: string; cooccur: Array<[number, number, number]> }>;
}
```
**Fallback path** — if `--explain` is not shipped on the installed `neural-trader` build (older versions; the flag was scoped for a follow-up upstream PR), the skill degrades to a deterministic feature-importance heuristic over the signal's input vector: `contribution_i = |input_i - μ_i| / σ_i` (z-score magnitude). This is a known proxy — not as faithful as attention/SHAP — and the resulting artifact is tagged `attribution_method: "input-zscore-fallback"` so downstream consumers can filter it out for regulator filings. Document the fallback path in the resulting markdown summary so the agent surfaces it to the user.
3. **Build the feature-contribution graph**:
- **Nodes**: one node per feature + one source node `__signal_output__` for the prediction.
- **Edges**: outgoing edges from `__signal_output__` to each feature node, weighted by `contribution_i`. When attention co-occurrence data is available, also add edges between feature nodes weighted by `cooccur` — this is what makes the PageRank single-entry rather than degenerating to plain top-K.
- **Source**: `__signal_output__` (index 0 by convention so the smoke can assert reproducibility).
4. **Run single-entry PageRank** — preferred path when `mcp__ruflo-sublinear__page-rank-entry` is registered:
```text
mcp__ruflo-sublinear__page-rank-entry({
nodes: GRAPH_NODES,
edges: GRAPH_EDGES,
sourceIndex: 0,
damping: 0.85,
maxIterations: 100,
tolerance: 1e-8,
seed: 42
})
```
The local fallback (`localSingleEntryPageRank` in `plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/src/signed-attribution.mjs`) runs ~30 LOC of seeded power-iteration when the MCP tool is not available — same math, same result up to floating-point tolerance, same ordering for the same seed (the Phase 6 smoke asserts this).
5. **Build the top-K `AttributionFeature[]`** via `topKFeatures(graph, scores, k=10, excludeIndex=0)` — excludes the source node from the ranked output. Ties broken by node index (lower index wins) so the ranking is deterministic.
6. **Sign the artifact** (reuses the Phase 4 signing primitives — same Ed25519 + canonicalization):
- Build the `SignedAttributionArtifact` body:
```ts
{
signalId: SIGNAL_ID,
modelId: SIGNAL.modelId,
features: TOP_K_FEATURES, // from step 5
graphMetadata: {
nodeCount: GRAPH.nodes.length,
edgeCount: COUNT_EDGES,
pageRankIterations: PR_RESULT.iterations,
seed: SEED // load-bearing for reproducibility
},
generatedAt: NEW_DATE_ISO
}
```
- Resolve the witness signing key — same lookup order as Phase 4:
1. `RUFLO_WITNESS_KEY_PATH` env var — JSON file with `{ "privateKey": "<hex>" }`.
2. `verification/witness-key.json` (the ADR-103 default path).
- If a key resolves: `signAttributionArtifact(body, privateKeyHex)` from `plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/src/signed-attribution.mjs`.
- If NEITHER path resolves: log `"[WARN] ruflo-neural-trader: no witness signing key found — storing attribution artifact in UNSIGNED degraded mode. Regulator filings will reject UNSIGNED artifacts."` and store the body unsigned. NEVER silently fall back.
7. **Store the (possibly signed) artifact** to the canonical `trading-analysis` namespace (ADR-126 Phase 1):
```text
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store({
key: "attribution-SIGNAL_ID-TIMESTAMP",
namespace: "trading-analysis",
value: JSON.stringify(signedArtifact)
})
```
The `trading-analysis` namespace is the canonical home for model-analysis output (regime classifications, technical-indicator summaries, model-training results — and now attribution rankings). Long-lived — no TTL — because the audit trail is the deliverable.
8. **Return the markdown summary** to the agent. Suggested format:
```
## Feature attribution for signal `SIGNAL_ID` (model: MODEL_ID)
| Rank | Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (4)
crates
plugin/agents
plugin/commands
plugin/skills
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
ef7d4f0535e5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/ruvnet__trader-explain.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-26 | ef7d4f0535e5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Trader Explain skill do?
🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Is Trader Explain safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 4 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Trader Explain access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (ef7d4f0535e5), read on 2026-09-26. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.