Cost ReportCAUTION
🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Overview
🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
ef7d4f0535e5OBSERVED · 2026-09-25What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: cost-report
description: Generate a cost report showing token usage and USD costs by agent and model
argument-hint: "[--period today]"
allowed-tools: mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_search mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_list mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_retrieve mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__agentdb_pattern-search mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__agentdb_semantic-route Bash
---
# Cost Report
Generate a comprehensive cost report showing token usage, USD costs, and budget utilization for the specified period.
## When to use
When you need to understand current spending -- how much each agent costs, which models consume the most budget, and whether you're on track to stay within budget.
## Steps
1. **Retrieve usage** -- call `mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_search` (or `_list` / `_retrieve`) on the `cost-tracking` namespace for the specified period (default: today). The `memory_*` tools route by namespace string; the `agentdb_hierarchical-*` tools do **not** (they route by tier `working|episodic|semantic`), so don't use them here. See [ruflo-agentdb ADR-0001 §"Namespace convention"](../../../ruflo-agentdb/docs/adrs/0001-agentdb-optimization.md) for the routing contract.
1a. **Read measured booster data** -- if `docs/benchmarks/runs/latest.json` exists, load it via `Bash`-shelled `node -e 'console.log(JSON.stringify(JSON.parse(require("fs").readFileSync("docs/benchmarks/runs/latest.json")).summary))'`. This provides Tier 1 measured values — booster cost/edit ($0), avg latency, win rate, plus any LLM baseline that was run (Gemini, Sonnet 4.6, Opus 4.7 latencies and per-edit costs). Use these in step 4 for the **measured** Tier breakdown rather than estimated.
2. **Compute costs** -- for each record, calculate cost using model pricing:
- Haiku: $0.25/M input, $1.25/M output
- Sonnet: $3.00/M input, $15.00/M output
- Opus: $15.00/M input, $75.00/M output
- Include cache write/read costs where applicable
3. **Aggregate by model** -- sum costs per model, compute percentage share
4. **Aggregate by tier** -- classify each record as Tier 1 / Tier 2 / Tier 3 using **three** signals (in priority order): (a) bench data from step 1a — for any record that maps to a measured booster intent, use $0 / measured-latency directly; (b) the `[AGENT_BOOSTER_AVAILABLE]` flag stored by the `cost-booster-route` skill in `cost-tracking`; (c) the model name as fallback (`haiku` → Tier 2; `sonnet`/`opus` → Tier 3). Sum costs per tier, compute share, and count Tier 1 bypasses. The tier breakdown is the most actionable single line — it tells the user what fraction of Sonnet/Opus spend was Tier 1-eligible.
5. **Aggregate by agent** -- sum costs per agent, include the model each agent used
6. **Check budget** -- recall budget configuration via `memory_retrieve` and compute utilization percentage, check alert thresholds (50%/75%/90%/100%)
7. **Report** -- display: total cost, budget remaining, **tier breakdown** (Tier 1 / Tier 2 / Tier 3), model breakdown, agent breakdown, active alerts. See REFERENCE.md §"Cost report shape" for the canonical layout.
## CLI alternative
```bash
npx @claude-flow/cli@latest memory search --query "cost report for today" --namespace cost-tracking
npx @claude-flow/cli@latest memory list --namespace cost-tracking
```Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (4)
crates
plugin/agents
plugin/commands
plugin/skills
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
ef7d4f0535e5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/ruvnet__cost-report.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-25 | ef7d4f0535e5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Cost Report skill do?
🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Is Cost Report safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 4 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Cost Report access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (ef7d4f0535e5), read on 2026-09-25. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.