Cost Booster EditCAUTION
🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Overview
🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
ef7d4f0535e5OBSERVED · 2026-09-25What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: cost-booster-edit
description: Apply a simple code transform via agent-booster's WASM engine — sub-millisecond, deterministic, $0 (no LLM call). Companion to cost-booster-route.
argument-hint: "<intent> <file>"
allowed-tools: Bash
---
# Cost Booster Edit
Direct wrapper around `agent-booster.apply()` (npm `agent-booster` v0.2.x, exposed via `agentic-flow/agent-booster`). Use when a transform is **already classified** as Tier 1 eligible — `cost-booster-route` recommends *whether*; this skill *executes*.
## When to use
- Bulk transforms across many files (`var → const`, `add-types`, `remove-console`, `add-error-handling`, `async-await`, `add-logging`).
- Any simple, structural edit where an LLM would otherwise be called and billed.
- Inside CI pipelines where determinism + zero-cost matter more than naturalness.
**Do NOT use when** the transform requires reasoning about intent, naming, or cross-file context — those are Tier 2/3 jobs.
## Steps
1. **Take inputs** — `intent` (one of the 6 booster intents) and `file` path.
2. **Read the source** to a variable, derive the intended `edit` text from the intent (caller supplies).
3. **Invoke** — run from anywhere under `v3/` so `agent-booster` resolves:
```bash
node --input-type=module -e '
import("agent-booster")
.then(async ({ AgentBooster }) => {
const booster = new AgentBooster();
const r = await booster.apply({
code: process.argv[1],
edit: process.argv[2],
language: process.argv[3] || "javascript",
});
console.log(JSON.stringify({
success: r.success, output: r.output, latency: r.latency,
confidence: r.confidence, strategy: r.strategy,
tokens: r.tokens,
}));
})
.catch(e => console.log(JSON.stringify({ success: false, error: String(e.message) })));
' -- "$CODE" "$EDIT" "$LANG"
```
4. **Check confidence** — default threshold is `0.5`. Below that, fail closed: do NOT write the file; report and escalate to Tier 2/3.
5. **Write back** the `output` field if `success && confidence >= 0.5`.
6. **Persist outcome** — `memory_store --namespace cost-tracking --key "booster-edit-..." --value '{"intent":..., "latency":..., "confidence":..., "strategy":..., "applied":true}'`. Feed the routing learner via `hooks_model-outcome` (use the `cost-optimize` skill's step 8).
## Measured benchmark (2026-05-04, this checkout)
5 representative intents run through `AgentBooster.apply()`:
| intent | latency (ms) | wall (ms) | confidence | strategy | success |
|--------------------|-------------:|----------:|-----------:|-----------------|---------|
| var-to-const | 5 | 5 | 0.65 | fuzzy_replace | true |
| add-types | 1 | 1 | 0.64 | fuzzy_replace | true |
| remove-console | 0 | 0 | 0.70 | fuzzy_replace | true |
| add-error-handling | 0 | 0 | 0.85 | exact_replace | true |
| async-await | 0 | 0 | 0.85 | exact_replace | true |
Avg measured latency ≈ **1.2 ms**. All 5 above the default 0.5 confidence threshold. See `docs/benchmarks/0002-baseline.md` for the LLM-baseline comparison.
## What's verified locally
| Claim | Status here |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **100% win rate** | **Verified** — 12/12 on `bench/booster-corpus.json` (see `runs/latest.json`). Booster AND Gemini 2.0 Flash both score 12/12 — this is a structural-correctness corpus, not a hard adversarial one. |
| **Sub-millisecond latency** | **Verified** — avg 0.67 ms, p50 0 ms, p99 6 ms, max 6 ms. |
| **$0 per edit** | **Verified structurally** — no API call, no token billing. |
| **Deterministic AST-based merge** | **Verified** — same inputs reproduce the same `output` and `strategy`. |
| **Confidence ≥ 0.5 ⇒ correct** | **Verified on this corpus** — 12/12 above 0.5 (min 0.551), all correct. |
| **`350×` speedup vs. LLM** | **Verified — exceeded against every tier:** 1000.9× vs Gemini 2.0 Flash, **1838.7× vs Claude Sonnet 4.6**, **2634.1× vs Claude Opus 4.7**. Run `BENCH_LLM_BASELINE=1 BENCH_ANTHROPIC=1 node scripts/bench.mjs` to refresh. |
| **Cost saved per edit** | **Measured:** $0.000020 vs Gemini, **$0.000722 vs Sonnet 4.6**, **$0.004720 vs Opus 4.7** (the booster side is $0 in all cases). |
| **Win parity with frontier LLMs** | **Verified** — Booster, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Sonnet 4.6, Opus 4.7 all scored 12/12 on this corpus. Booster matches LLM accuracy structurally for deterministic transforms. |
To extend: add cases to `bench/booster-corpus.json`, run `( cd v3 && node ../plugins/ruflo-cost-tracker/scripts/bench.mjs )` (or with `BENCH_LLM_BASELINE=1`), commit `runs/latest.json`. Smoke step 23 fails the build if win rate drops below 0.80.
**Override the LLM model:** `BENCH_LLM_MODEL='claude-sonnet-4'` (when wired against `api.anthropic.com`) or `BENCH_LLM_MODEL='models/gemini-2.5-flash'` for a reasoning-model comparison. Pricing flags: `BENCH_LLM_PRICE_IN`, `BENCH_LLM_PRICE_OUT`.
`fuzzy_replace` is best-effort; for production transforms prefer cases that route to `exact_replace` (≥0.85 confidence in our sample).
## Cross-references
ADR-0002 §"Decision 1" (route classifier) and §"Riskiest assumption" (Bash-shelled invocation) · `cost-booster-route` (classifier-side companion) · `agent-booster` npm README (3-mode install, MCP / npm / HTTP).Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (4)
crates
plugin/agents
plugin/commands
plugin/skills
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
ef7d4f0535e5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/ruvnet__cost-booster-edit.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-25 | ef7d4f0535e5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Cost Booster Edit skill do?
🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features adaptive memory, self-learning intelligence, federation, vector RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex / Hermes and many more Integrated
Is Cost Booster Edit safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 4 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Cost Booster Edit access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (ef7d4f0535e5), read on 2026-09-25. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.