Atlas / Skills / revfactory / Wedding Budget Optimizer

Wedding Budget OptimizerSAFE

skills/revfactory/wedding-budget-optimizer
Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
1,297
01

Overview

An agent skill published by revfactory.

Read from source at commit 459e1bb8f76eOBSERVED · 2026-10-12
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: wedding-budget-optimizer
description: "wedding budget itemby allocation and cost reduction strategy optimization budget management tool. 'budget-controller' and 'wedding-reviewer' agent budget allocationand cost verifyto do when this skill's budget allocation official, cost standardtable, approx. strategy must be utilized. 'wedding budget allocation', 'cost reduction', 'budget simulation' etc. However, vendor comparison timeline design is outside this skill's scope."
---

# Wedding Budget Optimizer — wedding budget optimization tool

wedding budget itemby allocation ratio, cost standard, approx. strategy provide.

## wedding cost structure (Korean 2024-2025)

### overall cost pyeongbalanced

```
Korean pyeongbalanced wedding cost (2024):
 totalcost: approx. 2.5-3.500M KRW (both families )
 
composition:
 week(beforetax/): 1.5-2.500M KRW (50-70%)
 ceremony·: 2,000-5,0000,000 KRW (10-15%)
 wedding gifts·betrothal gifts: 1,000-3,0000,000 KRW (5-10%)
 trousseau: 1,000-2,0000,000 KRW (3-7%)
 honeymoon: 200-6000,000 KRW (2-3%)
```

### ceremony cost taxdepartment allocation (ceremony 3,0000,000 KRW standard)

| item | ratio | amount | notes |
|------|------|------|------|
| catering cost (company) | 40-50% | 1,200-1,5000,000 KRW | 200people × 6-7.50,000 KRW |
| studio/dress/makeup | 15-25% | 450-7500,000 KRW | ++ |
| ceremony | 5-10% | 150-3000,000 KRW | versus (catering cost by also when) |
| invitation | 2-3% | 60-900,000 KRW | 250 standard |
| company·congratulatory song | 1-3% | 30-900,000 KRW | |
| ·decoration | 3-5% | 90-1500,000 KRW | department, decoration |
| return gifts | 2-3% | 60-900,000 KRW | guest |
| traditional ceremony | 1-2% | 30-600,000 KRW | traditional ceremony, versus |
| example | 5-10% | 150-3000,000 KRW | |

## budget allocation official

### guest number based catering cost calculation

```
catering cost total = expected guest × 1person catering cost × (1 + VAT)

report totalnumber:
 versus 200people → actual expected: 160-180people (80-90%)
 versus 300people → actual expected: 230-260people (77-87%)

planbefore : guaranteed headcount = actual expected × 0.9 ( planbefore)
```

### congratulatory money example

```
expected congratulatory money = Σ(totalby personKRW × expected amount)

totalby pyeongbalanced congratulatory money (2024):
 person: 10-300,000 KRW
 : 5-100,000 KRW
 : 5-70,000 KRW
 degreeperson: 3-50,000 KRW

congratulatory money = congratulatory money / catering cost total
 general: 60-80%
 guest : 80-100% (catering cost possible)
```

## cost reduction strategy TOP 10

### approx. (1000,000 KRW+ reduction)

```
1. off-season·week before ceremony (catering cost 10-15% to doperson + versus reduction)
 reduction: 150-3000,000 KRW

2. studio/dress/makeup individual totalapprox. (package versus nature comparison)
 reduction: 100-2000,000 KRW (situationby)

3. guest number optimization (needed versus basis)
 reduction: versus 50people decrease × 70,000 KRW = 3500,000 KRW

4. element (departmentminute DIY)
 - invitation: day invitation (80-90% reduction)
 - return gifts: directly (50% reduction)
 - : degreeperson (1000,000 KRW reduction)
```

### duringbetween approx. (30-1000,000 KRW reduction)

```
5. totalapprox. to doperson (10-20% by)
 reduction: 50-1000,000 KRW

6. degreeperson items to doperson (un- weddingKorean through)
 reduction: 30-500,000 KRW

7. usage (income versus)
 reduction: 30-500,000 KRW

8. return gifts person 
 reduction: 20-400,000 KRW
```

### work approx. (300,000 KRW or less)

```
9. day invitation ( versus)
 reduction: 20-300,000 KRW

10. traditional ceremony directly preparation 
 reduction: 15-250,000 KRW
```

## budget levelby scenario

### approx. (2,0000,000 KRW)

```
catering cost: 150people × 60,000 KRW = 9000,000 KRW
studio/dress/makeup: 1500,000 KRW (during package)
ceremony: 1000,000 KRW (day wedding hall off-season)
invitation: 100,000 KRW (day)
·decoration: 500,000 KRW
basis: 1500,000 KRW
example: 1400,000 KRW
→ congratulatory moneyas catering cost departmentminute possible
```

### tablelevel (3,5000,000 KRW)

```
catering cost: 200people × 80,000 KRW = 1,6000,000 KRW
studio/dress/makeup: 4000,000 KRW (duringgrade package)
ceremony: 2000,000 KRW
invitation: 500,000 KRW (person+day)
·decoration: 1000,000 KRW
company·congratulatory song: 500,000 KRW
return gifts: 500,000 KRW
traditional ceremony: 400,000 KRW
: 800,000 KRW
example: 3300,000 KRW
```

### premium (5,0000,000 KRW)

```
catering cost: 250people × 120,000 KRW = 3,0000,000 KRW 
studio/dress/makeup: 7000,000 KRW (premium)
ceremony: 3000,000 KRW ( versus)
invitation: 800,000 KRW
·decoration: 2000,000 KRW
company: 800,000 KRW
return gifts: 800,000 KRW
: 1500,000 KRW
basis: 2000,000 KRW
example: 2100,000 KRW
```

## budget management trackingtable

```markdown
## wedding budget trackingtable

**total budget**: X0,000 KRW | ****: X0,000 KRW | ****: X0,000 KRW | **progressrate**: X%

| item | budget | deposit | final payment | total | status |
|------|------|--------|------|---------|------|
| wedding hall | X0,000 KRW | X0,000 KRW | X0,000 KRW | X0,000 KRW | ✅ totalapprox. |
| studio/dress/makeup | X0,000 KRW | - | - | - | 🔍 comparison during |
| honeymoon | X0,000 KRW | - | - | - | ⏳ un-number |

### department schedule
| dayspecialist | vendor | amount | type | |
|------|------|------|------|------|
| D-180 | wedding hall | X0,000 KRW | deposit | |
| D-30 | wedding hall | X0,000 KRW | final payment | guest number after |
```

## reference

- Korean market 2024-2025 standard
- detailed cost data: `references/wedding-cost-data.md` reference
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (2)

LOWPrompt injection · review.instruction_override · CWE-94, CWE-1427
ko/30-open-source-launcher/.claude/agents/license-specialist.md
당신은 오픈소스 라이선스 전문가입니다. 프로젝트에 적합한 라이선스를 선정하고, 의존성 간 호환성을 검증합니다.
Why it matters. These injected agent definitions instruct the AI to adopt specific professional personas (license strategist and license specialist) that override its normal function as a wedding budget optimization assistant.
Fix. rewrite it so the instruction says plainly what it does, and asks the user before it acts
LOWPrompt injection · review.misleading_scope · CWE-94, CWE-1427
en/100-ip-portfolio/.claude/agents/license-strategist.md
You are an intellectual property licensing strategy specialist. You maximize IP asset monetization and create business value through strategic partnerships.
Why it matters. The package description claims to be a wedding budget optimizer, but the skill.md file contains complete agent definitions for IP licensing and open source license specialists, directing the AI to perform unrelated tasks not disclosed in the package scope.
Fix. rewrite it so the instruction says plainly what it does, and asks the user before it acts

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-12 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 459e1bb8f76efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/revfactory__wedding-budget-optimizer.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-12459e1bb8f76eSAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

Is Wedding Budget Optimizer safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Wedding Budget Optimizer access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (459e1bb8f76e), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement