Venue EvaluationSAFE

An agent skill published by revfactory.

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: venue-evaluation
description: "venue assessment scorecard. logistics-manager agent event venue comparison assessmentto do when reference. 'venue assessment', ' comparison', 'venue ' request when usage. However, venue exampleapprox. versus totalapprox. scope outside."
---

# Venue Evaluation — venue assessment scorecard

logistics-manager agent venue decision-making total.

## venue assessment standard (during scorecard)

| standard | duringvalue | assessment item |
|------|--------|----------|
| nature | 20% | versusduring, weekgap, |
| acceptancecapability | 20% | personKRW, annualnature |
| when/equipment | 15% | AV, WiFi, beforecapability, people |
| cost | 15% | versus, departmentversuscost, negotiation degree |
| catering | 10% | withindepartment/external, quality, limitation |
| minutecrisis | 10% | specialistperson, brand qualitynature |
| service | 10% | before , responsecapability, |

### assessment template

| standard(duringvalue) | venue A | venue B | venue C |
|------------|--------|--------|--------|
| nature(20%) | 4(0.8) | 5(1.0) | 3(0.6) |
| acceptancecapability(20%) | 5(1.0) | 3(0.6) | 4(0.8) |
| when(15%) | 4(0.6) | 4(0.6) | 5(0.75) |
| cost(15%) | 3(0.45) | 5(0.75) | 2(0.3) |
| catering(10%) | 4(0.4) | 3(0.3) | 5(0.5) |
| minutecrisis(10%) | 5(0.5) | 3(0.3) | 4(0.4) |
| service(10%) | 4(0.4) | 4(0.4) | 3(0.3) |
| **totalpoint** | **4.15** | **3.95** | **3.65** |

## event typeby venue requirement

| event type | core requirement | | weekmatters |
|-----------|----------|---------|---------|
| | stage++seating | decoration/actual | sound system, people |
| | +report | day/Uspecialist | between |
| | items between+ | day | flow of movement, |
| beforewhen | department between+beforecapability | / | flow of movement, during |
| taxun- | presentationversus+seating | actual | Q&A |
| | | annual | stage, people |

## current company checklist

### required confirm item

-  acceptance personKRW (versus/recommended)
-  change possible department
-  AV equipment (, , , )
-  WiFi (versus, when within number)
-  beforecapability ( position, capacity, minutebefore)
-  people ( possiblenature, specialistannual)
-  sound system (, , external )
-  catering between (week, from flow of movement)
-  nature (, person when)
-  weekgap (versusnumber, , )
-  / (, , time limitation)
-  versusbasis between (, actual)
-  actual (itemsnumber, position, status)
-  / (planbefore standard, insurance)

### company required item
1. /
2. person ( status)
3. AV equipment
4. catering/week
5. actual/when
6. weekgap/ 

## totalapprox. confirm matters

| item | confirm point |
|------|-----------|
| versus time | /number time included department |
| exceeding cost | time exceeding, personKRW exceeding |
| | durationby cancellation fee (30/60/90day) |
| insurance | venue insurance, event insurance |
| catering limitation | external vendor , degree |
| week | week , |
| decoration limitation | , usage, |
| limitation | timeversusby when |

## quality checklist

| item | standard |
|------|------|
| afterreport number | minimum 3 comparison |
| current company | final 2 required |
| scorecard | 7items standard during assessment |
| totalapprox. review | /insurance/limitation confirm |
| versusplan | Plan B venue 1 secure |

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.