Vendor Negotiation GuideSAFE

An agent skill published by revfactory.

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: vendor-negotiation-guide
description: " vendor(wedding hall·studio/dress/makeup·honeymoon etc.) comparison and negotiation strategy guide. 'vendor-analyst' and 'budget-controller' agent vendor comparisonand estimate analysisto do when this skill's vendor comparison matrix, price standardtable, negotiation must be utilized. 'vendor comparison', 'estimate analysis', ' negotiation' etc. However, timeline design checklist writing is outside this skill's scope."
---

# Vendor Negotiation Guide — vendor comparison·negotiation guide

 vendorby price standard, comparison point, negotiation strategy provide.

## key vendor typeby price standard (2024-2025)

### wedding hall

| type | price scope (1person) | guaranteed headcount | characteristic |
|------|-----------------|---------|------|
| day wedding hall | 6-100,000 KRW | 150-250people | nature, nature |
| (4nature) | 10-150,000 KRW | 200-300people | service, weekgap |
| (5nature) | 15-300,000 KRW | 200-400people | premium |
| | 8-150,000 KRW | 80-150people | between |
| | 400-8000,000 KRW (versus) | 50-200people | specialist also High |
| | 5-80,000 KRW or | 30-80people | scale |

** cost checklist**:
```
□ catering cost VAT (10%) by also department
□ weekgap (free versusnumber confirm)
□ congratulatory money numbernumber
□ addition time usage
□ traditional ceremonyactual usage
□ / KRW usage
□ guest / cost
□ sound system/people addition
□ guaranteed headcount un- when 
```

### studio/dress/makeup (··)

| item | price scope | included content | weekmatters |
|------|----------|----------|---------|
| | 80-3000,000 KRW | KRW 200-500, report 30-80 | addition report cost confirm |
| | 50-2000,000 KRW | + 2-3 | taxfrom by also department |
| | 40-1000,000 KRW | rehearsal+ | by also |
| package | 150-5000,000 KRW | 3 integration | individual versus 10-20% to doperson |

**studio/dress/makeup addition cost **:
```
□ KRW addition ( 1-30,000 KRW)
□ report addition ( 3-50,000 KRW)
□ (50-1000,000 KRW+)
□ taxfrom (, day: 10-300,000 KRW)
□ department (: 15-300,000 KRW)
□ rehearsal addition 
□ /specialist 
□ (: 50-1500,000 KRW)
```

### basis vendor

| item | price scope | notes |
|------|----------|------|
| invitation | 1,000-5,000KRW | 200 standard 20-1000,000 KRW |
| wedding gifts (degree) | 100-5000,000 KRW+ | 0.3-0.5ct standard |
| honeymoon | 200-6000,000 KRW | ~ |
| MC | 30-1000,000 KRW | specialist MC standard |
| congratulatory song | free-500,000 KRW | degreeperson/specialist number |
| traditional ceremony | 20-500,000 KRW | versus, , traditional ceremony |

## vendor comparison matrix

```markdown
| comparison item | vendor A | vendor B | vendor C |
|----------|--------|--------|--------|
| price | X0,000 KRW | X0,000 KRW | X0,000 KRW |
| included within | [detailed] | [detailed] | [detailed] |
| addition cost | [detailed] | [detailed] | [detailed] |
| position/nature | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
| review/pyeong | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| exampleapprox. possibleday | [schedule] | [schedule] | [schedule] |
| peak season to doperson | 10% | None | 15% |
| **totalcost estimation** | **X0,000 KRW** | **X0,000 KRW** | **X0,000 KRW** |
```

## negotiation strategy

### periodby negotiationcapability

| period | negotiationcapability | strategy |
|------|--------|------|
| off-season (7-8month, 1-2month) | High | to doperson 15-20% request possible |
| levelpeak season (3-4month, 9-10month) | duringbetween | department service request |
| peak season (5-6month, 11-12month) | Low | basis exampleapprox. to doperson only possible |
| dayday·day | Low | day versus to doperson quality |
| day before | duringbetween | after versus 10-15% |

### negotiation point TOP 10

```
1. "catering cost to doperson" — guest number negotiation (200people+: 5-10% to doperson possible)
2. "guaranteed headcount " — actual expected 
3. "VAT included" — departmenttax included total negotiation
4. "time annual" — 30minute-1time free annual
5. "weekgap addition" — free weekgap versusnumber versus
6. "traditional ceremonyactual free" — by also 
7. "KRW addition" — studio/dress/makeup KRW 50-100 addition
8. " " — etc.grade included
9. "rehearsal addition" — free 1 addition
10. " condition" — minuteto dodepartment, numbernumber 
```

### negotiation template

```
" wedding hall also comparison duringperson, [vendorpeople] package from
 . catering cost [X]0,000 KRWfrom possibleto do?"

"budget [X]cause, scope withinfrom
regarding compositionas proposalweekactual number ?"

"basic composition , [addition item] includedweekwhen
 totalapprox.."
```

## totalapprox. before required confirm matters

```
□ deposit·final payment department schedule and ratio
□ ·change when cancellation fee condition
□ re-degree·before when response ( company )
□ included within detailed list (from)
□ addition cost occurrence possible item (from)
□ guest number change possible timing (D-7 etc.)
□ responsible / 
□ review company/ provide scope
```

## reference

- Korean market 2024-2025 standard, degree·periodby 
- detailed vendor list: `references/vendor-database.md` reference

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.