Atlas / Skills / revfactory / Tows Matrix Builder

Tows Matrix BuilderSAFE

skills/revfactory/tows-matrix-builder
Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
1,297
01

Overview

An agent skill published by revfactory.

Read from source at commit 459e1bb8f76eOBSERVED · 2026-10-12
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: tows-matrix-builder
description: "A methodology for converting SWOT analysis results into a TOWS matrix to derive actionable strategies. Used for 'TOWS analysis,' 'SWOT strategy derivation,' 'strategy matrix,' 'cross-analysis,' and 'SO/WO/ST/WT strategies' when developing SWOT-based strategies. Note: Financial modeling and organizational design are outside the scope of this skill."
---

# TOWS Matrix Builder — SWOT-to-Strategy Conversion Methodology

A skill that enhances strategy derivation for swot-specialist and strategy-writer.

## Target Agents

- **swot-specialist** — Systematically derives TOWS strategies from SWOT analysis
- **strategy-writer** — Connects TOWS strategies to the execution roadmap

## TOWS Matrix Structure

```
              | Strengths (Internal) | Weaknesses (Internal) |
──────────────┼─────────────────────┼──────────────────────┤
Opportunities | SO Strategy          | WO Strategy           |
(External)    | Use strengths to     | Overcome weaknesses   |
              | seize opportunities  | to seize opportunities|
──────────────┼─────────────────────┼──────────────────────┤
Threats       | ST Strategy          | WT Strategy           |
(External)    | Use strengths to     | Minimize weaknesses   |
              | counter threats      | and threats           |
```

## Strategy Derivation Guide by Type

### SO Strategy (Offensive) — "Strengths x Opportunities"

```
Question: "How can we use this strength to maximize this opportunity?"

Patterns:
1. Market expansion: Technology (S) + Growing market (O) → Enter new markets
2. New product development: R&D capability (S) + Customer needs (O) → Differentiated product
3. Alliance/M&A: Brand (S) + Industry restructuring (O) → Strategic partnership

Example:
  S: "Top-tier AI technology development capability"
  O: "Healthcare AI market growing 25% annually"
  SO: "Concentrate AI technology investment in healthcare diagnostics to capture first-mover advantage"
```

### WO Strategy (Redirectional) — "Weaknesses x Opportunities"

```
Question: "Can we overcome this weakness to capture this opportunity?"

Patterns:
1. Capability building: Talent shortage (W) + Market opportunity (O) → Hiring/training investment
2. Partnership: Lack of channels (W) + Growing demand (O) → Distribution partnership
3. Outsourcing/Adoption: Technology gap (W) + Technology maturity (O) → Solution adoption

Example:
  W: "Lack of global sales network"
  O: "Accelerating digital transformation in Southeast Asia"
  WO: "Establish a joint venture with a local partner to enter the Southeast Asian market"
```

### ST Strategy (Defensive) — "Strengths x Threats"

```
Question: "How can we use this strength to defend against or convert this threat?"

Patterns:
1. Differentiation: Technology (S) + Intensifying competition (T) → Widen the technology gap
2. Switching costs: Customer relationships (S) + Substitutes (T) → Strengthen lock-in
3. Preemptive action: Market position (S) + Regulatory change (T) → Lead regulation

Example:
  S: "15 patents held"
  T: "Global enterprise entering the market"
  ST: "Leverage the patent portfolio for technology licensing + strengthen barriers to entry"
```

### WT Strategy (Retreat/Minimize) — "Weaknesses x Threats"

```
Question: "How can we minimize damage at the intersection of weakness and threat?"

Patterns:
1. Shrink/exit: Divest uncompetitive businesses
2. Risk hedging: Diversify dependencies
3. Structural change: Fundamental organizational/process improvement

Example:
  W: "Unstable cash flow"
  T: "Expected economic downturn"
  WT: "Divest non-core business units + secure cash + focus on core competencies"
```

## Strategy Priority Evaluation

```
Score each TOWS strategy against these criteria:

| Criterion | Weight | 1-5 Scale |
|-----------|--------|-----------|
| Strategic impact | 30% | Contribution to business outcomes |
| Feasibility | 25% | Executable with current resources |
| Urgency | 20% | Opportunity cost if delayed |
| Risk | 15% | Impact if it fails |
| Resource efficiency | 10% | Return on investment |

Weighted sum → Select top 3-5
```

## SWOT Element Derivation Guide

### Internal Analysis (S/W) Framework

```
7S Framework:
  Strategy — Strategic position
  Structure — Organizational structure
  Systems — Processes/IT
  Shared Values — Culture/values
  Style — Leadership
  Staff — Workforce/capabilities
  Skills — Core competencies

VRIO Resource Analysis:
  Valuable — Is the resource valuable?
  Rare — Is it rare?
  Inimitable — Is it hard to imitate?
  Organized — Is there a system to exploit it?
  → All four Yes = Sustainable competitive advantage (S)
  → Any No = Weakness or temporary advantage (W)
```

### External Analysis (O/T) Framework

```
PESTLE:
  Political — Political/policy changes
  Economic — Economic conditions
  Social — Social/demographic changes
  Technological — Technological advances
  Legal — Laws/regulations
  Environmental — Environmental/ESG

Classify each factor as Opportunity (O) or Threat (T)
```

## Deliverable Template

```markdown
## TOWS Strategy Matrix

### SWOT Summary
| Strengths (S) | Weaknesses (W) |
| Opportunities (O) | Threats (T) |

### TOWS Strategies
| | S1 | S2 | S3 | W1 | W2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O1 | SO-1 | | | WO-1 | |
| O2 | | SO-2 | | | WO-2 |
| T1 | ST-1 | | | | WT-1 |
| T2 | | ST-2 | | WT-2 | |

### Strategy Priorities
| Rank | Strategy | Type | Score | Execution Timing |
```
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-12 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 459e1bb8f76efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/revfactory__tows-matrix-builder.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-12459e1bb8f76eSAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

Is Tows Matrix Builder safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Tows Matrix Builder access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (459e1bb8f76e), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement