Text Analytics MethodsSAFE
Overview
An agent skill published by revfactory.
459e1bb8f76eOBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: text-analytics-methods
description: "Text analytics methodology. Referenced by topic-classifier and trend-detector agents when extracting topics and deriving trends from unstructured text. Used for 'topic classification', 'keyword analysis', 'text mining' requests. Note: NLP model training and large-scale data processing pipeline development are out of scope."
---
# Text Analytics Methods
Enhances the text analysis capabilities of topic-classifier / trend-detector agents.
## Topic Classification Methodology
### Bottom-up Classification
```
1. Read all feedback (sample: 100+ entries)
2. Identify recurring keywords/phrases
3. Cluster similar keywords
4. Assign topic names to clusters
5. Finalize topic system (MECE verification)
6. Tag all data with topics
```
### Top-down Classification
```
Pre-defined categories:
├── Product/Service Quality
│ ├── Features
│ ├── Performance
│ ├── Design
│ └── Reliability
├── Customer Experience
│ ├── Usability
│ ├── Customer Support
│ ├── Purchase Process
│ └── Delivery
├── Price/Value
│ ├── Price Level
│ ├── Value for Money
│ └── Discounts/Promotions
└── Other
├── Competitor Comparison
└── Improvement Requests
```
## Keyword Analysis
### TF-IDF Concept Application
```
TF (Term Frequency) = Word frequency in a specific document
IDF (Inverse Document Frequency) = Rarity across all documents
TF-IDF = TF × IDF
High TF-IDF = Words important in a specific document but uncommon overall
→ Useful for identifying feedback anomalies
```
### Keyword Extraction Process
```
1. Remove stop words: articles, conjunctions, common verbs
2. Extract nouns/adjectives
3. Calculate frequency (top 30)
4. N-gram analysis (2-gram, 3-gram)
"slow delivery", "support not reachable"
5. Keyword cloud visualization
```
## Trend Analysis Techniques
### Time-series Topic Trends
| Topic | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Trend |
|-------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-------|
| Delivery | 15% | 18% | 22% | 25% | ↑ Attention |
| Quality | 30% | 28% | 25% | 20% | ↓ Improving |
| Price | 20% | 22% | 20% | 21% | → Stable |
### Anomaly Detection Criteria
```
Anomaly signals:
- Topic ratio +50% vs previous period → urgent analysis
- Negative sentiment surge of +0.3 or more → investigate cause
- New keyword emergence (absent in previous quarter) → new issue
```
## Insight Derivation Framework
### Pyramid Principle (So What?)
```
Level 1 (Data): "Delivery complaints at 25%, up 7pp from previous quarter"
Level 2 (Analysis): "Delivery delays mainly caused by new logistics partner switch"
Level 3 (Insight): "Need to renegotiate logistics SLA or revert to previous provider"
Level 4 (Action): "Request SLA review from logistics team, improvement plan due in 2 weeks"
```
### Action Priority Matrix
| Insight | Frequency | Sentiment Intensity | Impact | Ease of Implementation | Priority |
|---------|-----------|--------------------| -------|----------------------|----------|
| Delivery improvement | High | -0.8 | High | Medium | ★★★★★ |
| UI improvement | Medium | -0.5 | Medium | High | ★★★★ |
| New feature A | Low | +0.3 | Low | Low | ★★ |
## Quality Checklist
| Item | Criteria |
|------|----------|
| Classification system | MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) |
| Sample size | 100+ entries or full dataset |
| Multi-tagging | Multiple topics per entry allowed |
| Trends | Minimum 3-period comparison |
| So What | Data → Analysis → Insight → Action |
| Visualization | Keyword cloud + trend chart |Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
459e1bb8f76efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/revfactory__text-analytics-methods.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 459e1bb8f76e | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
Is Text Analytics Methods safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Text Analytics Methods access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (459e1bb8f76e), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.