Rhetoric PatternsSAFE

An agent skill published by revfactory.

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: rhetoric-patterns
description: "numbercompany pattern library. speech-writer and debate-preparer agent persuasioncapability speech and buildingto do when reference. 'numbercompany', ' structure', 'persuasion technique' request when usage. However, actual presentation nature training scope outside."
---

# Rhetoric Patterns — numbercompany pattern library

speech-writer / debate-preparer agent persuasioncapability numbercompany pattern.

## speech structure pattern

### pattern 1: Monroe's Motivated Sequence

| stage | purpose | technique |
|------|------|------|
| 1. Attention (week) | during | statistics, story, question |
| 2. Need (needed) | problem person | currentactual when, data present |
| 3. Satisfaction  | present | specific approach, quality description |
| 4. Visualization (visualization) | un- | nature/failure scenario |
| 5. Action (action) | action also | specific , CTA |

**quality**: persuasion/proposal presentation, investment value, speech

### pattern 2: PREP (Point-Reason-Example-Point)

```
Point: " complete "
Reason: "current un- cost annualbetween 30% increaseand basis whendocument"
Example: "competitor A after person cost 40% reduction"
Point: "according tofrom 3minutebasisto beforeexchange complete "
```

**quality**: , Q&A answer, meeting 

### pattern 3: problem--profit (PSB)

```
Problem: current [problem] because [departmentquality result] occurrenceand 
Solution: [proposal] through problem to do number 
Benefit: through [specific profit] number 
```

### pattern 4: story 

```
1. day (situation setting)
2. before (etc./problem)
3. beforeexchangepoint (insight/decision)
4. (action/result)
5. (message)
```

## 3element

| element | description | applied technique |
|------|------|----------|
| **Ethos**  | specialist qualification/ also | experience grade, specialistnature, nature |
| **Pathos** (emotion) | audience emotion | story, , wheneach material |
| **Logos**  | quality basis | data, statistics, persontotal |

### presentation typeby proportion

| presentation type | Ethos | Pathos | Logos |
|----------|-------|--------|-------|
| basisspeech | 30% | 40% | 30% |
| investment value | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| basisdepartment | 20% | 50% | 30% |
| presentation | 30% | 10% | 60% |
| crisis response | 40% | 30% | 30% |

## structure (debate)

### Toulmin model

```
Claim (argument): [/]
 ← Data (basis): [companyactual/]
 ← Warrant (report): [basis→argument annual ]
 ← Backing : [report basis]
 ← Qualifier (Korean): "versusdepartmentminute case", "generalas"
 ← Rebuttal (counterargument): "However, [example situation]from..."
```

### counterargument response strategy

| strategy | description | examplewhen |
|------|------|------|
| acceptance after beforeexchange | daydepartment person after core re- | ", degree only duringKorean ..." |
| | point beforeexchange | "cost not investment " |
| response | versus present | "actual data report..." |
| conditiondepartment acceptance | limitationquality person | " situationfrom degree, context..." |

## numbercompanyquality value

| value | description | examplewhen |
|------|------|------|
| (Anaphora) | sentence whenwork | " to do number . ." |
| versus (Antithesis) | versus structure | "work eachdegree tax, tax" |
| minute (Rule of Three) | 3items | ", and, planbefore" |
| numbercompany question (Rhetorical Q) | question | " ?" |
| (Analogy) | Korean | "data whenversus " |
| specialist utilization | specific figure | "3 1case company ..." |

## quality checklist

| item | standard |
|------|------|
| structure | peopleKorean whenwork-duringbetween- |
| core message | 1sentenceas summary possible |
| Ethos/Pathos/Logos | 3element balanced |
| CTA | specific action |
| time qualitynature | minute 150(Korean standard) |

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.