Rfp ResponderSAFE
Overview
An agent skill published by revfactory.
459e1bb8f76eOBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: rfp-responder description: "RFI/RFP response full pipeline. An agent team collaborates to generate requirements analysis, capability matching, technical proposal, pricing proposal, and differentiation strategy. Use this skill for requests like 'RFP response', 'write a proposal', 'RFP analysis', 'bid proposal', 'technical proposal', 'pricing proposal', 'public procurement bid', 'RFP response document', 'SI proposal', 'IT project bidding', and other RFP/RFI response needs. Also supports review of existing proposals. However, direct access to government procurement systems, real-time bid price retrieval, and electronic bidding participation are outside the scope of this skill." --- # RFP Responder — RFI/RFP Response Full Pipeline An agent team collaborates to generate requirements analysis, capability matching, technical proposal, pricing proposal, and differentiation strategy. ## Execution Mode **Agent Team** — 5 members communicate directly via SendMessage and perform cross-validation. ## Agent Composition | Agent | File | Role | Type | |-------|------|------|------| | requirement-analyst | `.claude/agents/requirement-analyst.md` | RFP analysis, evaluation criteria, hidden needs | general-purpose | | capability-matcher | `.claude/agents/capability-matcher.md` | Track record matching, team composition, gap analysis | general-purpose | | technical-proposer | `.claude/agents/technical-proposer.md` | Methodology, architecture, schedule, quality management | general-purpose | | pricing-strategist | `.claude/agents/pricing-strategist.md` | Cost estimation, bidding strategy, price simulation | general-purpose | | proposal-reviewer | `.claude/agents/proposal-reviewer.md` | Cross-validation, differentiation consistency, score estimation | general-purpose | ## Workflow ### Phase 1: Preparation (Performed directly by orchestrator) 1. Extract from user input: RFP document, company info, track record, team info 2. Create `_workspace/` and save input to `00_input.md` ### Phase 2: Team Assembly and Execution | Order | Task | Assigned To | Dependencies | Deliverable | |-------|------|-------------|-------------|-------------| | 1 | Requirements Analysis | requirement-analyst | None | `01_requirement_analysis.md` | | 2 | Capability Matching | capability-matcher | Task 1 | `02_capability_matrix.md` | | 3 | Technical Proposal | technical-proposer | Tasks 1, 2 | `03_technical_proposal.md` | | 4 | Pricing Proposal | pricing-strategist | Tasks 1, 2, 3 | `04_pricing_proposal.md` | | 5 | Review + Differentiation | proposal-reviewer | Tasks 1-4 | `05_differentiation_strategy.md`, `06_review_report.md` | ### Phase 3: Integration and Final Deliverables ## Execution Modes by Request Scale | Pattern | Mode | Agents | |---------|------|--------| | "Full RFP response" | **Full Pipeline** | All 5 | | "Analyze this RFP" | **Analysis Mode** | requirement-analyst only | | "Write a technical proposal" | **Technical Mode** | requirement-analyst + capability-matcher + technical-proposer + reviewer | | "Review this proposal" | **Review Mode** | proposal-reviewer only | ## Agent Extension Skills | Agent | Extension Skill | Role | |-------|----------------|------| | capability-matcher, proposal-reviewer | `win-theme-builder` | Win Theme construction, strength mapping, competitive analysis, proposal strategy | | pricing-strategist | `pricing-calculator` | Labor cost calculation, overhead/profit calculation, bidding strategy simulation |
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
459e1bb8f76efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/revfactory__rfp-responder.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 459e1bb8f76e | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
Is Rfp Responder safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Rfp Responder access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (459e1bb8f76e), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.