Porter Five ForcesSAFE

An agent skill published by revfactory.

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: porter-five-forces
description: "Methodology for systematically performing Porter's 5 Forces analysis. Use this skill for 'Porter analysis', '5 Forces', 'industry competition analysis', 'entry barrier analysis', 'industry attractiveness', and other industry structure analysis tasks. Note: in-depth financial statement analysis and M&A advisory are outside the scope of this skill."
---

# Porter Five Forces — Industry Structure Analysis Methodology

A skill that enhances industry structure analysis for the industry-analyst and competitor-analyst.

## Target Agents

- **industry-analyst** — Analyzes industry competitive dynamics
- **competitor-analyst** — Evaluates competitive positioning within industry structure

## The Five Forces Framework

### 1. Threat of New Entrants
```
Assessment factors:
- Capital requirements (High = low threat)
- Economies of scale (High = low threat)
- Brand loyalty / switching costs
- Access to distribution channels
- Government regulations / licenses
- Proprietary technology / patents
- Network effects

Rating: Low / Medium / High threat
```

### 2. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
```
Assessment factors:
- Number of suppliers (Few = high power)
- Switching costs to alternative suppliers
- Availability of substitutes
- Supplier concentration vs. industry
- Importance of volume to supplier
- Forward integration threat

Rating: Low / Medium / High power
```

### 3. Bargaining Power of Buyers
```
Assessment factors:
- Number of buyers (Few = high power)
- Buyer volume relative to total sales
- Switching costs for buyers
- Buyer price sensitivity
- Product differentiation
- Backward integration threat
- Access to market information

Rating: Low / Medium / High power
```

### 4. Threat of Substitute Products
```
Assessment factors:
- Availability of close substitutes
- Price-performance ratio of substitutes
- Buyer switching costs
- Buyer propensity to substitute
- Cross-industry substitutes

Rating: Low / Medium / High threat
```

### 5. Rivalry Among Existing Competitors
```
Assessment factors:
- Number and size of competitors
- Industry growth rate
- Product differentiation
- Exit barriers
- Fixed costs / value added
- Capacity utilization
- Competitive information availability

Rating: Low / Medium / High rivalry
```

## Analysis Output Template

```markdown
## Porter's Five Forces Analysis: [Industry]

### Summary
| Force | Rating | Key Factors |
|-------|--------|-------------|
| New Entrants | Low/Med/High | [Top 2-3 factors] |
| Supplier Power | Low/Med/High | [Top 2-3 factors] |
| Buyer Power | Low/Med/High | [Top 2-3 factors] |
| Substitutes | Low/Med/High | [Top 2-3 factors] |
| Rivalry | Low/Med/High | [Top 2-3 factors] |

### Overall Industry Attractiveness
[Assessment based on combined forces]

### Strategic Implications
1. [Implication + recommended action]
2. [Implication + recommended action]
3. [Implication + recommended action]
```

## Scoring Guide

```
Each force: 1 (Low) to 5 (High)
Industry Attractiveness Score = 25 - Sum of forces
  20-25: Very attractive
  15-19: Attractive
  10-14: Moderate
  5-9: Unattractive
```

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.