Atlas / Skills / revfactory / Materiality Assessment

Materiality AssessmentSAFE

skills/revfactory/materiality-assessment
Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
1,297
01

Overview

An agent skill published by revfactory.

Read from source at commit 459e1bb8f76eOBSERVED · 2026-10-12
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: materiality-assessment
description: "ESG materiality assessment matrix. Referenced by the esg-reporter and improvement-planner agents when evaluating ESG issue materiality and setting priorities. Use for 'materiality assessment', 'importance analysis', or 'Materiality Matrix' requests. Stakeholder surveys and external certification are out of scope."
---

# Materiality Assessment — ESG Materiality Assessment

Enhances the materiality analysis capabilities of the esg-reporter and improvement-planner agents.

## Double Materiality

### Concept

```
Financial Materiality:
  ESG issue -> Impact on corporate value
  "Does this issue affect revenue, costs, or assets?"

Impact Materiality:
  Corporate activity -> Environmental/social impact
  "What is our business's impact on the environment/society?"

Double Materiality = Consider both financial + impact materiality
(CSRD/ESRS requirement)
```

## Materiality Assessment Process

### 5-Step Procedure

```
Step 1: Develop ESG Issue Pool
  - Reference GRI Standards topics
  - SASB industry-specific indicators
  - Competitor/peer benchmarking
  - Media/regulatory trends

Step 2: Identify Stakeholders
  - Internal: Management, employees, board
  - External: Investors, customers, supply chain, communities, regulators

Step 3: Assess Materiality
  - Stakeholder surveys/interviews
  - Expert panel evaluation
  - Data-driven analysis

Step 4: Build Matrix
  - X-axis: Business impact (financial materiality)
  - Y-axis: Stakeholder concern (impact materiality)
  - Plot issues -> Quadrant classification

Step 5: Validation and Approval
  - Management review/approval
  - Board reporting
  - External verification (optional)
```

## Materiality Matrix

```
Stakeholder Concern
High  +---------------+---------------+
      |  Monitor      |  Top Priority |
      |  (Enhance     |  (Strategic   |
      |   dialogue)   |   core)       |
      +---------------+---------------+
      |  Observe      |  Manage       |
      |  (Minimal     |  (Improvement |
      |   oversight)  |   plan)       |
Low   +---------------+---------------+
      Low        Business Impact     High
```

### Quadrant Response Strategies

| Quadrant | Issue Examples | Response |
|----------|-------------|----------|
| Top Priority | Carbon emissions, human rights, governance | Strategic integration, KPIs, reporting |
| Manage | Waste, supply chain | Improvement plans, monitoring |
| Monitor | Biodiversity, information security | Stakeholder dialogue, trend tracking |
| Observe | Certain philanthropic efforts | Minimal oversight |

## Industry-Specific Material Issues Guide

### Manufacturing

| Issue | E/S/G | Materiality | GRI Indicator |
|-------|-------|------------|--------------|
| Carbon Emissions | E | 5/5 | 305-1 through 305-5 |
| Energy Management | E | 4/5 | 302-1 through 302-4 |
| Occupational Safety | S | 5/5 | 403-1 through 403-10 |
| Waste Management | E | 4/5 | 306-1 through 306-5 |
| Supply Chain Management | S | 3/5 | 308, 414 |

### IT/Services

| Issue | E/S/G | Materiality | GRI Indicator |
|-------|-------|------------|--------------|
| Information Security | G | 5/5 | 418 |
| Talent Management | S | 5/5 | 401, 404 |
| Diversity/Inclusion | S | 4/5 | 405 |
| Energy (Data Centers) | E | 4/5 | 302 |
| Digital Ethics | G | 3/5 | - |

### Financial Services

| Issue | E/S/G | Materiality | GRI Indicator |
|-------|-------|------------|--------------|
| ESG Investment/Finance | E/S | 5/5 | FS7, FS8 |
| Ethics/Compliance | G | 5/5 | 205, 206 |
| Information Security | G | 5/5 | 418 |
| Financial Accessibility | S | 4/5 | FS13, FS14 |
| Climate Risk | E | 4/5 | TCFD |

## ESG Reporting Framework Mapping

| Framework | Primary Audience | Mandatory/Voluntary | Characteristics |
|-----------|-----------------|--------------------|----|
| GRI | All stakeholders | Voluntary (de facto standard) | Universal, topic-specific standards |
| SASB | Investors | Voluntary -> ISSB integration | 77 industry standards |
| TCFD | Financial/Investors | Trending mandatory | Climate financial disclosure |
| ISSB (S1/S2) | Investors | Trending mandatory | Global standard consolidation |
| CSRD/ESRS | EU companies | Mandatory | Double materiality, detailed |
| K-ESG | Domestic companies | Voluntary | Government guidelines |

## KPI Setting Guide

### E (Environmental) KPIs

| KPI | Unit | Calculation |
|-----|------|------------|
| Carbon Emissions | tCO2eq | Scope 1+2+3 |
| Carbon Intensity | tCO2eq/Revenue Unit | Emissions/Revenue |
| Renewable Energy Share | % | Renewable/Total Energy |
| Waste Recycling Rate | % | Recycled/Total Waste |
| Water Usage | cubic meters | Direct measurement |

### S (Social) KPIs

| KPI | Unit | Calculation |
|-----|------|------------|
| Occupational Injury Rate | per mille | Injured/Workers x 1000 |
| Diversity Ratio | % | Female Managers/Total Managers |
| Training Hours | Hours/Person | Total Training Hours/Headcount |
| Employee Satisfaction | Score | Survey score |

### G (Governance) KPIs

| KPI | Unit | Calculation |
|-----|------|------------|
| Board Independence | % | Independent Directors/Total Directors |
| Ethics Violations | Count | Via reporting system |
| Information Security Incidents | Count | Security monitoring |
| Compliance | % | Training completion rate |

## Quality Checklist

| Item | Criteria |
|------|----------|
| Double Materiality | Both financial + impact materiality considered |
| Stakeholders | 5+ groups engaged |
| Issue Pool | 15-25 issues per industry |
| Matrix | 4-quadrant placement |
| Framework | GRI + 1 or more additional frameworks linked |
| KPIs | 3+ per E/S/G pillar |
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-12 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 459e1bb8f76efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/revfactory__materiality-assessment.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-12459e1bb8f76eSAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

Is Materiality Assessment safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Materiality Assessment access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (459e1bb8f76e), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement