Atlas / Skills / revfactory / Internal Control Framework

Internal Control FrameworkSAFE

skills/revfactory/internal-control-framework
Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
1,297
01

Overview

An agent skill published by revfactory.

Read from source at commit 459e1bb8f76eOBSERVED · 2026-10-12
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: internal-control-framework
description: "Internal control framework guide. Referenced by scope-designer and checklist-builder agents when designing audit scope and control items. Used for 'COSO', 'internal controls', 'control testing' requests. Note: external audit representation and legal opinion preparation are out of scope."
---

# Internal Control Framework

Enhances the audit design capabilities of scope-designer / checklist-builder agents.

## COSO Internal Control Framework

### 5 Components

| Component | Description | Audit Points |
|-----------|-------------|-------------|
| Control Environment | Organizational culture, ethics, competence | Code of ethics, segregation of duties, training |
| Risk Assessment | Identification/analysis of risks to objectives | Risk assessment process, documentation |
| Control Activities | Policies/procedures responding to risks | Approvals, verification, physical controls |
| Information/Communication | Timely delivery of necessary information | Reporting structure, IT controls |
| Monitoring | Continuous evaluation of control effectiveness | Self-assessments, internal audit |

### Control Types

| Type | Description | Examples |
|------|-------------|---------|
| Preventive | Block before occurrence | Approval procedures, access restrictions, training |
| Detective | Discover after occurrence | Audit logs, reconciliation, anomaly detection |
| Corrective | Rectify after discovery | Corrective actions, rollback, recovery |

### Control Testing Methods

| Method | Description | Best For |
|--------|-------------|----------|
| Inquiry | Interview the owner | Initial understanding, process mapping |
| Observation | Observe actual execution | Field control verification |
| Inspection | Review documents/records | Evidence verification, approval records |
| Reperformance | Execute the control procedure | Direct verification of control effectiveness |

## Audit Scope Design Framework

### Risk-Based Audit Approach

```
1. Identify audit target processes
2. Assess inherent risk (amount, complexity, change)
3. Assess control risk (control design, operating effectiveness)
4. Residual risk = Inherent risk × Control risk
5. Prioritize audit by highest residual risk
```

### Audit Scope Definition Template

```markdown
## Audit Scope

### In-Scope
- Period: [YYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD]
- Target: [Department/Process/System]
- Criteria: [Regulations/Policies/Laws]

### Out-of-Scope
- [Excluded items and rationale]

### Audit Criteria
| Criteria | Source |
|----------|--------|
| [Criteria 1] | [Internal policy/Law] |
| [Criteria 2] | [Industry standard] |
```

## Checklist Design Patterns

### Control Item Card

```markdown
## Control Item: [ID]-[Item Name]

- Category: [COSO component]
- Type: [Preventive/Detective/Corrective]
- Owner: [Department/Role]
- Frequency: [Daily/Weekly/Monthly/Quarterly/Annual]

### Control Description
[Specific control activity description]

### Test Procedure
1. [Test step 1]
2. [Test step 2]
3. [Verification criteria]

### Evidence
- [Required evidence list]

### Determination Criteria
- Effective: [Criteria]
- Partially effective: [Criteria]
- Ineffective: [Criteria]
```

## Quality Checklist

| Item | Criteria |
|------|----------|
| COSO coverage | 5 components reviewed |
| Risk-based | Residual risk-based prioritization |
| Control types | Preventive/detective/corrective balance |
| Test methods | 2+ methods per item |
| Evidence | Required evidence specified per test |
| Determination | 3-level determination criteria |
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-12 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 459e1bb8f76efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/revfactory__internal-control-framework.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-12459e1bb8f76eSAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

Is Internal Control Framework safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Internal Control Framework access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (459e1bb8f76e), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement