Atlas / Skills / revfactory / Cross Document Linker

Cross Document LinkerSAFE

skills/revfactory/cross-document-linker
Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
1,297
01

Overview

An agent skill published by revfactory.

Read from source at commit 459e1bb8f76eOBSERVED · 2026-10-12
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

```markdown
---
name: cross-document-linker
description: "A document linking tool that manages cross-references and consistency across service legal documents. The 'consistency-reviewer' and each specialist agent MUST use this skill's linking matrix and check rules to maintain consistent definitions, clauses, and terminology across documents. Use for 'cross-document consistency', 'cross-reference management', 'terminology unification', etc. Note: authoring individual documents is outside the scope of this skill."
---

# Cross Document Linker — Legal Document Cross-Reference & Consistency Management

Manages reference relationships and consistency across Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, Cookie Policy, Refund Policy, and Copyright Notice.

## Cross-Reference Matrix Between Documents

### Shared Definition Framework

| Shared Term | Source Document | Referencing Documents | Consistency Rule |
|-------------|----------------|-----------------------|-----------------|
| "Service" | Terms of Service Article 2 | All documents | Use identical definition |
| "Member/User" | Terms of Service Article 2 | All documents | Unify identical terminology |
| "Personal Information" | Privacy Policy Article 1 | Terms, Cookie Policy | Apply Privacy Policy definition |
| "Cookie" | Cookie Policy Article 1 | Privacy Policy | Apply Cookie Policy definition |
| "Paid Service" | Terms of Service Article X | Refund Policy | Same scope |
| "Content" | Terms of Service Article X | Copyright Notice | Identical definition |

### Clause Linkage Relationships

```
[Terms of Service]
├── Article X (Personal Information) → [Privacy Policy] full reference
│   "Members' personal information is processed in accordance with the separate Privacy Policy."
├── Article X (Cookies) → [Cookie Policy] full reference
│   "For matters regarding cookie use, please refer to the Cookie Policy."
├── Article X (Refunds) → [Refund Policy] full reference
│   "Detailed matters regarding refunds and cancellations are governed by the Refund Policy."
├── Article X (Copyright) → [Copyright Notice] reference
│   "For matters regarding copyright of content within the Service, please refer to the Copyright Notice."
└── Article X (Terms Amendment) → Amendment procedures applied consistently to all documents

[Privacy Policy]
├── Collected items → Consistent with [Terms of Service] membership registration clauses
├── Consignment information → Consistent with [Terms of Service] third-party provision clauses
└── Cookie-related → Cross-reference with [Cookie Policy]

[Refund Policy]
├── Payment conditions → Consistent with [Terms of Service] paid service clauses
└── Personal information (refunds) → Consistent with [Privacy Policy] payment information retention clauses
```

## Consistency Check Rules

### Mandatory Compliance Rules (🔴 Immediate correction required on violation)

| Rule ID | Rule | Targets |
|---------|------|---------|
| CR-01 | Service name is identical across all documents | All documents |
| CR-02 | Company name, representative, and contact information match | Terms, Privacy Policy |
| CR-03 | Personal information collection items match between Terms and Privacy Policy | Terms ↔ Privacy Policy |
| CR-04 | Refund conditions match between Terms and Refund Policy | Terms ↔ Refund Policy |
| CR-05 | Cookie types match between Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy | Privacy Policy ↔ Cookie Policy |
| CR-06 | Effective date is identical across all documents | All documents |
| CR-07 | Jurisdiction court and governing law match between Terms and Privacy Policy | Terms ↔ Privacy Policy |

### Recommended Compliance Rules (🟡 Improvement recommended)

| Rule ID | Rule | Targets |
|---------|------|---------|
| CR-08 | Unified terminology (prohibit mixed use of member/user/subscriber) | All documents |
| CR-09 | Amendment notification procedures are identical | Terms ↔ Privacy Policy |
| CR-10 | Age criteria unified (age 14 / age 19) | Terms ↔ Privacy Policy |
| CR-11 | Dispute resolution procedures consistent | Terms ↔ Refund Policy |
| CR-12 | Indemnification scope has no mutual contradictions | Terms ↔ each policy |

## Consistency Report Output Structure

```markdown
## Cross-Document Consistency Verification Report

### Verification Summary
| Rule ID | Rule | Status | Documents |
|---------|------|--------|-----------|
| CR-01 | Service name match | ✅ | All |
| CR-03 | Collection items match | ❌ | Terms ↔ Privacy Policy |

### Inconsistency Details (🔴)
1. **CR-03**: Terms of Service specifies collection of "phone number"; missing from Privacy Policy
   - Fix: Add "phone number" to Privacy Policy collection items

### Improvement Recommendations (🟡)
1. **CR-08**: Terms of Service uses "member"; Refund Policy uses "user"
   - Fix: Unify to "member"
```

## Version Control Rules

```
Document version synchronization:
  - When any one document is changed, related documents must be reviewed
  - Set identical effective dates
  - Record cross-impact documents in the change history table
  - Keep previous versions accessible for at least 30 days
```

## References

- Cross-application of E-Commerce Act, Terms Regulation Act, and Personal Information Protection Act
- Detailed checklist: see `references/cross-check-templates.md`
```
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (1)

LOWInventory / provenance · skill.no_frontmatter · CWE-1104
SKILL.md:1
Why it matters. SKILL.md lacks name/description frontmatter

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-12 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 459e1bb8f76efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/revfactory__cross-document-linker.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-12459e1bb8f76eSAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

Is Cross Document Linker safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Cross Document Linker access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (459e1bb8f76e), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement