Competency ModelSAFE

An agent skill published by revfactory.

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: competency-model
description: "competency model design framework. jd-writer and screening-expert agent jobby core competency definitionand assessment standard establishto do when reference. 'competency model', 'job competency', 'skill matrix' request when usage. However, personcompany assessment whensystem building grade total design scope outside."
---

# Competency Model — competency model design

jd-writer / screening-expert agent competency based hiring design competency .

## competency model structure

### 3total competency framework

| total | description | examplewhen |
|------|------|------|
| core competency (Core) | beforecompany | client during, , |
| leadership competency | managementspecialist or more | vision present, , decision-making |
| job competency (Functional) | job | , data analysis, specialistperson |

### competency level (Proficiency Level)

| level | people | description | quality grade |
|------|------|------|----------|
| L1 | basis | perform, basic | /person |
| L2 | execution | perform, tablelevel work | week |
| L3 | | situation response, degree also possible | when |
| L4 | specialist | level impact, | / |
| L5 | | total level specialistnature, strategy | + |

### competency template

```markdown
## competency: [competencypeople]

### definition
[Korean sentence definition]

### action indicator (Behavioral Indicator)

**L1 (basis)**
- [ possibleKorean action 1]
- [ possibleKorean action 2]

**L2 (execution)**
- [ possibleKorean action 1]
- [ possibleKorean action 2]

**L3 **
- [ possibleKorean action 1]
- [ possibleKorean action 2]

### assessment method
- interview question: [structure question]
- task: [actualbasis task]
- reference: [confirm point]
```

## jobby competency mapping examplewhen

### degree

| competency | week(L2) | when(L3) | (L4) |
|------|----------|----------|---------|
| capability | ★★★ required | ★★★ required | ★★★ required |
| whensystem design | ★ basis | ★★★ required | ★★★ required |
| code review | ★ number | ★★★ | ★★★ |
| | - | ★★ preferred | ★★★ required |
| technical strategy | - | ★ | ★★★ week also |

## JD writing competency annualtotal

### STAR based qualification requirement

```markdown
## qualification requirement

### required (Must-have)
- [competency 1] L3 or more: [specific /performance standard]
 example: "versusscale (DAU 100+) whensystem operations 2year or more"
- [competency 2] L2 or more: [specific standard]

### preferred (Nice-to-have) 
- [competency 3]: [specific standard]
- [competency 4]: [specific standard]

### minute (action technical)
- [competency 1 L3 action indicator specialistannual technical]
- [competency 2 L3 action indicator specialistannual technical]
```

## screening matrix

| assessment item | point | PASS standard | confirm method |
|----------|------|----------|----------|
| required competency A | 30 | 21point+ | capabilityfrom + task |
| required competency B | 25 | 18point+ | capabilityfrom + interview |
| preferred competency C | 15 | - | capabilityfrom |
| document qualitynature | 15 | 10point+ | interview |
| nature re-capability | 15 | 10point+ | interview |
| **total** | **100** | **70point+** | |

## quality checklist

| item | standard |
|------|------|
| competency number | job 5~8items |
| level | L1~L5 action indicator specific |
| required/preferred | required 3~4items, preferred 2~3items |
| assessment method | competencyby 1items or more |
| degree | natureby/annual duringquality tablecurrent |

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.