Budget PlanningSAFE

An agent skill published by revfactory.

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: budget-planning
description: "event budget plan framework. concept-planner and logistics-manager agent event budget establishand managementto do when reference. 'event budget', 'cost calculation', 'budget allocation' request when usage. However, total processing tax scope outside."
---

# Budget Planning — event budget plan

concept-planner / logistics-manager agent budget establish competency .

## event budget category

### cost structure (tablelevel allocation)

| category | ratio | taxdepartment item |
|---------|------|----------|
| venue | 25~35% | versus, departmentversuswhen, insurance |
| catering | 20~30% | , from, equipment |
| content | 15~20% | speaker, content work, equipment |
| | 10~15% | promotion, person, degree |
| operations | 10~15% | personcapability, , reportplan |
| example | 5~10% | actualnature versus |

### budget scaleby guide

| scale | personKRW | budget scope | person cost |
|------|------|----------|----------|
| scale | ~50people | ₩300~800 only | ₩6~16 only |
| duringscale | 50~200people | ₩800~3000 only | ₩8~15 only |
| versusscale | 200~1000people | ₩3000~1.500M | ₩10~15 only |
| | 1000people+ | ₩1.500M~ | ₩12~20 only |

## budget calculation template

```markdown
# [eventpeople] budget planfrom

## basic information
- daywhen: [date/time]
- venue: [venuepeople]
- expected personKRW: [N]people
- total budget: ₩[amount]

## detailed budget

| item | | quantity | total | notes |
|------|------|------|------|------|
| **[venue]** | | | **₩[total]** | |
| versus | ₩ | 1 | ₩ | |
| equipment versus | ₩ | N | ₩ | |
| **[catering]** | | | **₩[total]** | |
| company | ₩ | Npeople | ₩ | |
| / and | ₩ | Npeople | ₩ | |
| **[content]** | | | **₩[total]** | |
| speaker case | ₩ | Npeople | ₩ | |
| **totaltotal** | | | **₩[total]** | |
| example (10%) | | | ₩ | |
| **final total** | | | **₩** | |
```

## cost reduction strategy

| strategy | reduction and | risk |
|------|----------|--------|
| weekduring items | venue 30~50% | rate decrease |
| before whenwork | company 1 approx. | |
| companywithin venue | versus 100% | scale limitation |
| from | 20~50% | constraint |
| | venue·catering | technical cost increase |
| basis exampleapprox. | 10~20% | annualnature decrease |

## from guide

| etc.grade | | proposal amount |
|------|------|----------|
| | eventpeople included, basisspeech, before | total budget 30~50% |
| | department+presentation+ before | total budget 15~25% |
| | department++person | total budget 8~15% |
| actual | +person | total budget 3~8% |

## quality checklist

| item | standard |
|------|------|
| example | total budget 5~10% |
| person cost | total standard scope within |
| / | minute specify |
| schedule | deposit/interim payment/final payment |
| cost | when cancellation fee calculation |

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.