Atlas / Skills / revfactory / Audience Engagement

Audience EngagementSAFE

skills/revfactory/audience-engagement
Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
1,297
01

Overview

An agent skill published by revfactory.

Read from source at commit 459e1bb8f76eOBSERVED · 2026-10-12
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: audience-engagement
description: "audience strategy library. audience-analyst and rehearsal-coach agent audience analysis and presentation preparation to do when reference. 'audience analysis', 'presentation ', 'stage annual' request when usage. However, specialistperson scope outside."
---

# Audience Engagement — audience strategy

audience-analyst / rehearsal-coach agent audience analysis and design competency .

## audience analysis framework

### 5W audience analysis

| element | question | analysis point |
|------|------|-----------|
| Who | person | grade, specialistnature, personKRW, annualversus |
| What | expected | information, , , person |
| Why | | specialist/, basis, company |
| Where | environmentperson | versus/person, venue, timeversus |
| Worry | person | person, versus basis, |

### audience typeby strategy

| audience type | nature | strategy |
|----------|------|------|
| quality | un- , degreedegree | action during, emotion |
| duringquality | information insufficient, un-decision | data during, present |
| qualityversusquality | versus | based , pointquality persuasion |
| | Korean | value , minute degree |
| expert | degree level | analysis, wheneach |
| expert | backgrounddegree insufficient | /case, specialist minimization |

## technique ( 30)

| technique | examplewhen | and |
|------|------|------|
| statistics | "year Koreanfrom X only case..." | problem person |
| quality question | "minute during Y Korean minute?" | also |
| itemsperson story | "3year before ..." | empathy/ |
| people | " " | basis |
| current annual | " specialist whenfrom..." | i.e.whennature |
| person | " ..." | |

## technique (degree 60)

| technique | description |
|------|------|
| KRWpoint | story provide |
| action | "withinday when X reporttax" |
| un- vision | "1year after ..." |
| core | 3items core message re-organization |
| question | questionas each also |

## presentation management

### quality technique

| technique | method | |
|------|------|--------|
| | 4 basis-7 withinbasis | presentation 5minute before |
| | basis 2minute | presentation 10minute before |
| degree technique | basis, each during | stage |
| when | quality audience 3people each | presentation during |

### persondegreequality technique

| technique | method |
|------|------|
| | " = degree" |
| visualization | naturequality presentation complete |
| scenario | " degree? → also " |
| preparation | " minute preparation" |

## quality communication

### Mehrabian (emotion deliver standard)

| channel | proportion | core |
|------|------|------|
| (content) | 7% | message clarity |
| nature (tone/within) | 38% | approx./within/ |
| wheneach (table/) | 55% | /when/specialisttax |

### stage utilization

```
stage 3:
├── : /problem basis
├── during: core message/current
└── : un-//vision

 rule:
- point beforeexchange when 
- core message duringfrom
- Q&A audience directionas 
- during degree 
```

## quality checklist

| item | standard |
|------|------|
| audience analysis | 5W identify |
| | 30 within during |
| core message | 3items within |
| | CTA included |
| time allocation | minute 150, 2minute |
| rehearsal | minimum 3, 1 |
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-12 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 459e1bb8f76efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/revfactory__audience-engagement.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-12459e1bb8f76eSAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

Is Audience Engagement safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Audience Engagement access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (459e1bb8f76e), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement