Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Git Rebase

skill · pedronauck/skillsLicence not declaredAudited 16 Oct 2026 · source 118e61cf1c61

★ 637pushed 31 days ago
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 16 Oct 2026 · 118e61c
637repo stars · whole pedronauck/skills

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 118e61cf1c61 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Rebase branches and resolve cross-commit conflicts while preserving changes. Excludes merge-commit workflows, cherry-picking, and repository setup.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Git Rebase (pedronauck/skills)”. Retrieved 16 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/pedronauck/git-rebase

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 16 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codePASS0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 118e61cf1c61 · 16 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publisherpedronauck GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderpedronauck/skills/skills/mine/git-rebaseThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict118e61cf1c61A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 31 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Rebase branches and resolve cross-commit conflicts while preserving changes. Excludes merge-commit workflows, cherry-picking, and repository setup.

---
name: git-rebase
description: "Rebase branches and resolve cross-commit conflicts while preserving changes. Excludes merge-commit workflows, cherry-picking, and repository setup."
metadata:
  author: Pedro Nauck
  github: https://github.com/pedronauck
  repository: https://github.com/pedronauck/skills
---

# Git Rebase

Carry out the requested rebase while preserving both sides' intended behavior and unrelated work. A rebase request does not by itself authorize squashing, dropping commits, changing global Git settings, or publishing a rewritten branch.

1. Inspect status, current branch, target, and any in-progress rebase. Reuse a known target and current fetch evidence. Preserve dirty work; do not auto-stash, reset, checkout, clean, or stage unrelated paths. Use an isolated checkout when needed.
2. Before starting a new rebase, record HEAD and keep a backup ref when rewriting valuable history. `bash <skill-dir>/scripts/pre-rebase-backup.sh` creates a backup for a clean branch without modifying tracked files. An existing verified backup needs no duplicate.
3. Rebase onto the requested target directly by default. Use interactive/squash/reorder operations only when the user requested that history change; commit count is not a reason to squash. Consult `references/strategies.md` for an actual strategy decision.
4. When conflicts occur, inspect the replayed commit, base, and both sides. During rebase, `ours` is the target plus commits already replayed; `theirs` is the commit being replayed. Trace changed APIs and preserve intended security, state, and compatibility contracts rather than accepting one side wholesale.
5. Resolve the affected files, inspect their diff, stage only those resolved paths, then continue. Reuse valid observations for repeated conflicts. Do not add merge-history comments to production code or run a full suite after every file.
6. At the completed rebase, inspect the resulting patch series/diff and run checks for affected behavior plus the project's required delivery gate. Tests that expose a regression require a production fix, not weaker assertions.
7. Publish only when already authorized. Use `--force-with-lease` for a rewritten remote branch, and follow the project's current-head CI policy. If the lease fails, inspect the new remote commits; do not replace it with unconditional force.

Use `references/resolution-patterns.md` for semantic conflicts and `references/troubleshooting.md` for diagnosed operational failures. Helpers live under this skill's actual `scripts/` path; `analyze-conflicts.sh`/`validate-merge.sh` are optional aids after checking their repository assumptions. They do not replace the owning tests or gate. Recovery that discards work still needs the repository's explicit permission; a backup ref is evidence, not permission to reset.

Excerpt, first 2,825 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 118e61c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/pedronauck/skills
git -C skills checkout 118e61cf1c61

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 118e61cf1c61 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 118e61cf1c61

Similar skills

Questions about Git Rebase

What does the Git Rebase skill do?
My personal favorite skills
Is Git Rebase safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Git Rebase access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (118e61cf1c61), read on 2026-10-16. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.