Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

completion-check

skill · parcadei/continuous-claude-v3MIT licenceAudited 31 Oct 2026 · source 79ffdab59d4c

★ 3,948pushed 278 days ago
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 31 Oct 2026 · 79ffdab
3,948repo stars · whole parcadei/continuous-claude-v3

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 79ffdab59d4c and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Completion Check: Verify Infrastructure Is Wired

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “completion-check (parcadei/continuous-claude-v3)”. Retrieved 31 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/parcadei/completion-check

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 31 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high1 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityWARN1
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (1)

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 79ffdab59d4c · 31 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publisherparcadei GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderparcadei/continuous-claude-v3/.claude/skills/completion-checkThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceMITAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict79ffdab59d4cA new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 278 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Completion Check: Verify Infrastructure Is Wired

---
name: completion-check
description: "Completion Check: Verify Infrastructure Is Wired"
user-invocable: false
---

# Completion Check: Verify Infrastructure Is Wired

When building infrastructure, verify it's actually connected to the system before marking as complete.

## Pattern

Infrastructure is not done when the code is written - it's done when it's wired into the system and actively used. Dead code (built but never called) is wasted effort.

## DO

1. **Trace the execution path** - Follow from user intent to actual code execution:
   ```bash
   # Example: Verify Task tool spawns correctly
   grep -r "claude -p" src/
   grep -r "Task(" src/
   ```

2. **Check hooks are registered**, not just implemented:
   ```bash
   # Hook exists?
   ls -la .claude/hooks/my-hook.sh

   # Hook registered in settings?
   grep "my-hook" .claude/settings.json
   ```

3. **Verify database connections** - Ensure infrastructure uses the right backend:
   ```bash
   # Check connection strings
   grep -r "postgresql://" src/
   grep -r "sqlite:" src/  # Should NOT find if PostgreSQL expected
   ```

4. **Test end-to-end** - Run the feature and verify infrastructure is invoked:
   ```bash
   # Add debug logging
   echo "DEBUG: DAG spawn invoked" >> /tmp/debug.log

   # Trigger feature
   uv run python -m my_feature

   # Verify infrastructure was called
   cat /tmp/debug.log
   ```

5. **Search for orphaned implementations**:
   ```bash
   # Find functions defined but never called
   ast-grep --pattern 'async function $NAME() { $$$ }' | \
     xargs -I {} grep -r "{}" src/
   ```

## DON'T

- Mark infrastructure "complete" without testing execution path
- Assume code is wired just because it exists
- Build parallel systems (Task tool vs claude -p spawn)
- Use wrong backends (SQLite when PostgreSQL is architected)
- Skip end-to-end testing ("it compiles" ≠ "it runs")

## Completion Checklist

Before declaring infrastructure complete:

- [ ] Traced execution path from entry point to infrastructure
- [ ] Verified hooks are registered in .claude/settings.json
- [ ] Confirmed correct database/backend in use
- [ ] Ran end-to-end test showing infrastructure invoked
- [ ] Searched for dead code or parallel implementations
- [ ] Checked configuration files match implementation

## Example: DAG Task Graph

**Wrong approach:**
```
✓ Built BeadsTaskGraph class
✓ Implemented DAG dependencies
✓ Added spawn logic
✗ Never wired - Task tool still runs instead
✗ Used SQLite instead of PostgreSQL
```

**Right approach:**
```
✓ Built BeadsTaskGraph class
✓ Wired into Task tool execution path
✓ Verified claude -p spawn is called
✓ Confirmed PostgreSQL backend in use
✓ Tested: user calls Task() → DAG spawns → beads execute
✓ No parallel implementations found
```

## Source Sessions

- This session: Architecture gap discovery - DAG built but not wired, Task tool runs instead of spawn, SQLite used instead of PostgreSQL

Excerpt, first 2,931 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 79ffdab

Download folder ↗
uv run python -m my_feature

Commands as the repository documents them: shown, never run by us. Our verdict covers commit 79ffdab59d4c only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 79ffdab59d4c

README badge

For maintainers · shows the latest audit

ModelsAtlas: SAFE BMODELSATLASSAFE · B
[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/parcadei/completion-check/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/parcadei/completion-check/)

The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.

Similar skills

Add this badge to your README

[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/parcadei/completion-check/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/parcadei/completion-check/)

Questions about completion-check

What does the completion-check skill do?
Context management for Claude Code. Hooks maintain state via ledgers and handoffs. MCP execution without context pollution. Agent orchestration with isolated context windows.
Is completion-check safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can completion-check access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (79ffdab59d4c), read on 2026-10-31. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.