Atlas / Skills / opensensenova / Comparison Analysis

Comparison AnalysisSAFE

skills/opensensenova/comparison-analysis

Modular SenseNova skills for building AI-powered office assistants and productivity workflows

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
MIT
Stars
5,744
01

Overview

Modular SenseNova skills for building AI-powered office assistants and productivity workflows

Read from source at commit 657860e4d389OBSERVED · 2026-10-07
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: categorical-comparison-analysis
description: "对两类分类数据进行对比分析,统计数量差异与比例关系并生成可视化图表。"
---

# categorical-comparison-analysis

> This sub-skill covers one capability of the Excel workflow. For reading/counting/Parquet optimization, see the parent workflow SKILL.md.

Step1 读取文件并统计所有 sheet 的总行数,评估是否需要进行大文件优化处理。
```python
import pandas as pd
from pandas import read_excel
from pathlib import Path

# 统计所有 sheet 的行数以决定处理策略
file_path = "input_data.xlsx"
sheet_names = pd.ExcelFile(file_path).sheet_names
total_rows = 0
for sheet in sheet_names:
    # 仅读取行索引以快速计数
    df_tmp = read_excel(file_path, sheet_name=sheet, usecols=[0])
    total_rows += len(df_tmp)

print(f"Total rows across all sheets: {total_rows}")
```

Step2 提取对比维度的分类信息,执行数据清洗,包括去除空值、处理合并单元格填充以及排除非数据行。
```python
# 定义目标列名
target_col_a = "category_a_column"
target_col_b = "category_b_column"

# 处理合并单元格(ffill)并清洗数据
df[target_col_a] = df[target_col_a].ffill()
df[target_col_b] = df[target_col_b].ffill()

# 排除标题行占位符(如 '代码'、'名称')及空值
exclude_val = "代码" 
data_a = df[target_col_a].dropna()
data_a = data_a[data_a != exclude_val]

data_b = df[target_col_b].dropna()
data_b = data_b[data_b != exclude_val]
```

Step3 统计分类数量,计算差异值与占比,生成多维度对比统计表。
```python
count_a = len(data_a)
count_b = len(data_b)
total_count = count_a + count_b
difference = abs(count_a - count_b)

# 计算占比
ratio_a = (count_a / total_count) * 100 if total_count > 0 else 0
ratio_b = (count_b / total_count) * 100 if total_count > 0 else 0

# 构建统计摘要
summary_df = pd.DataFrame({
    "分类名称": ["类别A", "类别B"],
    "数量": [count_a, count_b],
    "占比": [f"{ratio_a:.2f}%", f"{ratio_b:.2f}%"]
})
print(summary_df)
print(f"数量差异: {difference}")
```

Step4 配置中文字体并生成可视化图表(柱状图与饼图),美化输出效果。
```python
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# 中文字体配置
plt.rcParams['font.sans-serif'] = ['SimHei', 'DejaVu Sans']
plt.rcParams['axes.unicode_minus'] = False

fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(14, 6))
labels = ['类别A', '类别B']
counts = [count_a, count_b]
colors = ['#3498db', '#e74c3c']

# 柱状图美化
bars = ax1.bar(labels, counts, color=colors, alpha=0.8, edgecolor='black')
ax1.set_title('分类数量对比', fontsize=14)
ax1.grid(axis='y', linestyle='--', alpha=0.6)
for bar in bars:
    height = bar.get_height()
    ax1.text(bar.get_x() + bar.get_width()/2., height + 0.1, f'{int(height)}', 
             ha='center', va='bottom', fontweight='bold')

# 饼图美化
ax2.pie(counts, labels=labels, colors=colors, autopct='%1.1f%%', startangle=140, explode=(0.05, 0))
ax2.set_title('分类比例分布', fontsize=14)

output_img = "/mnt/data/comparison_analysis_chart.png"
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(output_img, dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.show()
```

Step5 将分析结果导出为 Excel 文件,并生成可供下载的链接。
```python
from IPython.display import FileLink

output_path = "/mnt/data/analysis_report.xlsx"
with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path) as writer:
    summary_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='统计摘要', index=False)
    # 如果有明细数据也可在此导出

print(f"分析报告已生成")
display(FileLink(output_path, result_html_prefix="下载分析报告: "))
```
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-07 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 657860e4d389full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/opensensenova__comparison-analysis.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-07657860e4d389SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Comparison Analysis skill do?

Modular SenseNova skills for building AI-powered office assistants and productivity workflows

Is Comparison Analysis safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Comparison Analysis access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (657860e4d389), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement