Code Review SimpleSAFE
7×24 Desktop AI Agent for Everyone. Visual AI assistant with remote access, file management, and built-in AI browser.
Overview
7×24 Desktop AI Agent for Everyone. Visual AI assistant with remote access, file management, and built-in AI browser.
e0e9be0da18eOBSERVED · 2026-10-08What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: code-review-one description: Called only when actively triggered by the user.. --- git status and reviews the current code. 1. Whether it conforms to the halo-dev skill architecture, specifically: module/file structure (does the file belong to this module at all, does its directory placement match its responsibility boundary, should it be re-abstracted or split), naming (file, directory, export and symbol names follow the conventions of 2-3 sibling files), and dependency relationships (layer direction is respected, no cross-layer reach-through, no circular imports, no dependency introduced merely because it was convenient). Beyond conformance: whether the design is highly maintainable and modular, and whether it aligns with long-term architectural planning and code quality evolution. 2. Whether it affects existing functionality or causes regression issues. 3. Whether the new feature has obvious business defects or code bugs. 4. Whether there are performance issues, covering both first-screen performance (initial render, resource/bundle size, code splitting and lazy loading) and runtime performance (unnecessary re-renders, large-list rendering, memory leaks, redundant computations and requests). The above four points must be strictly communicated to all members.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e0e9be0da18efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/openkursar__code-review-simple.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e0e9be0da18e | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Code Review Simple skill do?
7×24 Desktop AI Agent for Everyone. Visual AI assistant with remote access, file management, and built-in AI browser.
Is Code Review Simple safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Code Review Simple access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e0e9be0da18e), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.