Atlas / Skills / openai / Chatgpt Apps

Chatgpt AppsSAFE

skills/openai/chatgpt-apps

Skills Catalog for Codex

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
1 documented
License
—
Stars
28,215
01

Overview

Skills Catalog for Codex

Read from source at commit 21ca169598cfOBSERVED · 2026-10-21
Advertisement
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
codexmentioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: chatgpt-apps
description: Build, scaffold, refactor, and troubleshoot ChatGPT Apps SDK applications that combine an MCP server and widget UI. Use when Codex needs to design tools, register UI resources, wire the MCP Apps bridge or ChatGPT compatibility APIs, apply Apps SDK metadata or CSP or domain settings, or produce a docs-aligned project scaffold. Prefer a docs-first workflow by invoking the openai-docs skill or OpenAI developer docs MCP tools before generating code.
---

# ChatGPT Apps

## Overview

Scaffold ChatGPT Apps SDK implementations with a docs-first, example-first workflow, then generate code that follows current Apps SDK and MCP Apps bridge patterns.

Use this skill to produce:

- A primary app-archetype classification and repo-shape decision
- A tool plan (names, schemas, annotations, outputs)
- An upstream starting-point recommendation (official example, ext-apps example, or local fallback scaffold)
- An MCP server scaffold (resource registration, tool handlers, metadata)
- A widget scaffold (MCP Apps bridge first, `window.openai` compatibility/extensions second)
- A reusable Node + `@modelcontextprotocol/ext-apps` starter scaffold for low-dependency fallbacks
- A validation report against the minimum working repo contract
- Local dev and connector setup steps
- A short stakeholder summary of what the app does (when requested)

## Mandatory Docs-First Workflow

Use `$openai-docs` first whenever building or changing a ChatGPT Apps SDK app.

1. Invoke `$openai-docs` (preferred) or call the OpenAI docs MCP server directly.
2. Fetch current Apps SDK docs before writing code, especially (baseline pages):
   - `apps-sdk/build/mcp-server`
   - `apps-sdk/build/chatgpt-ui`
   - `apps-sdk/build/examples`
   - `apps-sdk/plan/tools`
   - `apps-sdk/reference`
3. Fetch `apps-sdk/quickstart` when scaffolding a new app or generating a first-pass implementation, and check the official examples repo/page before inventing a scaffold from scratch.
4. Fetch deployment/submission docs when the task includes local ChatGPT testing, hosting, or public launch:
   - `apps-sdk/deploy`
   - `apps-sdk/deploy/submission`
   - `apps-sdk/app-submission-guidelines`
5. Cite the docs URLs you used when explaining design choices or generated scaffolds.
6. Prefer current docs guidance over older repo patterns when they differ, and call out compatibility aliases explicitly.
7. If doc search times out or returns poor matches, fetch the canonical Apps SDK pages directly by URL and continue; do not let search failure block scaffolding.

If `$openai-docs` is unavailable, use:

- `mcp__openaiDeveloperDocs__search_openai_docs`
- `mcp__openaiDeveloperDocs__fetch_openai_doc`

Read `references/apps-sdk-docs-workflow.md` for suggested doc queries and a compact checklist.
Read `references/app-archetypes.md` to classify the request into a small number of supported app shapes before choosing examples or scaffolds.
Read `references/repo-contract-and-validation.md` when generating or reviewing a repo so the output stays inside a stable “working app” contract.
Read `references/search-fetch-standard.md` when the app is connector-like, data-only, sync-oriented, or meant to work well with company knowledge or deep research.
Read `references/upstream-example-workflow.md` when starting a greenfield app or when deciding whether to adapt an upstream example or use the local fallback scaffold.
Read `references/window-openai-patterns.md` when the task needs ChatGPT-specific widget behavior or when translating repo examples that use wrapper-specific `app.*` helpers.

## Prompt Guidance

Use prompts that explicitly pair this skill with `$openai-docs` so the resulting scaffold is grounded in current docs.

Preferred prompt patterns:

- `Use $chatgpt-apps with $openai-docs to scaffold a ChatGPT app for <use case> with a <TS/Python> MCP server and <React/vanilla> widget.`
- `Use $chatgpt-apps with $openai-docs to adapt the closest official Apps SDK example into a ChatGPT app for <use case>.`
- `Use $chatgpt-apps and $openai-docs to refactor this Apps SDK demo into a production-ready structure with tool annotations, CSP, and URI versioning.`
- `Use $chatgpt-apps with $openai-docs to plan tools first, then generate the MCP server and widget code.`

When responding, ask for or infer these inputs before coding:

- Use case and primary user flows
- Read-only vs mutating tools
- Demo vs production target
- Private/internal use vs public directory submission
- Backend language and UI stack
- Auth requirements
- External API domains for CSP allowlists
- Hosting target and local dev approach
- Org ownership/verification readiness (for submission tasks)

## Classify The App Before Choosing Code

Before choosing examples, repo shape, or scaffolds, classify the request into one primary archetype and state it.

- `tool-only`
- `vanilla-widget`
- `react-widget`
- `interactive-decoupled`
- `submission-ready`

Infer the archetype unless a missing detail is truly blocking. Use the archetype to choose:

- whether a UI is needed at all
- whether to preserve a split `server/` + `web/` layout
- whether to prefer official OpenAI examples, ext-apps examples, or the local fallback scaffold
- which validation checks matter most
- whether `search` and `fetch` should be the default read-only tool surface

Read `references/app-archetypes.md` for the decision rubric.

## Default Starting-Point Order

For greenfield apps, prefer these starting points in order:

1. **Official OpenAI examples** when a close example already matches the requested stack or interaction pattern.
2. **Version-matched `@modelcontextprotocol/ext-apps` examples** when the user needs a lower-level or more portable MCP Apps baseline.
3. **`scripts/scaffold_node_ext_apps.mjs`** only when no close example fits, the user wants a tiny Node + vanilla starter, or network access/example retrieval is undesirable.

Do not generate a large custom scaffold from scratch if a close upstream example a
04

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-21 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 21ca169598cffull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/openai__chatgpt-apps.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-2121ca169598cfSAFEB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the chatgpt-apps — openai/skills skill do?

Skills Catalog for Codex

Is chatgpt-apps — openai/skills safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can chatgpt-apps — openai/skills access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does chatgpt-apps — openai/skills work with?

Its documentation mentions codex. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (21ca169598cf), read on 2026-10-21. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Add this badge to your README

Shows this page's audit result and links back to it. It updates when the audit does.

ModelsAtlas audit badge

Markdown
[![ModelsAtlas audit: Chatgpt Apps](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/openai/chatgpt-apps/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/openai/chatgpt-apps/)

Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.

Advertisement