Agent skill · Audited from source
Verify
skill · oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenixMIT licenceAudited 18 Oct 2026 · source 492f17636999
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 492f17636999 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Verify Elixir/Phoenix changes — compile, format, and test in one loop. Use after implementation, before PRs, or after fixing bugs.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Verify (oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix)”. Retrieved 18 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/verify
7 skills are called “Verify”. You are viewing oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix.
- oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix★ 567✓SAFE
- facebook/react★ 252k✓SAFE
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 39k✓SAFE
- emdash-cms/emdash★ 13k!CAUTION
- agenticnotetaking/arscontexta★ 3.5k✓SAFE
and 2 more with this name.
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 18 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 492f17636999 · 18 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- Publisheroliver-kriska GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderoliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/plugins/elixir-phoenix/skills/verifyThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceMITAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict492f17636999A new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 2 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Verify Elixir/Phoenix changes — compile, format, and test in one loop. Use after implementation, before PRs, or after fixing bugs.
---
name: verify
description: Verify Elixir/Phoenix changes — compile, format, and test in one loop. Use after implementation, before PRs, or after fixing bugs.
effort: low
---
# Verification Loop
Project-aware verification for Elixir/Phoenix. Reads `mix.exs` and `.check.exs` to discover tools, test commands, and custom aliases before running anything.
## Iron Laws
1. **Discover before running** — Read `mix.exs` first; never run `mix credo` if credo isn't a dependency
2. **Prefer ex_check** — If `:ex_check` + `.check.exs` exists, `mix check` replaces individual steps
3. **Prefer project aliases** — If `mix ci` or composite alias exists, use it over individual steps
4. **Run in order** — Later steps assume earlier ones pass
5. **Ask before E2E tests** — Unit tests run automatically; E2E/integration tests need user confirmation
6. **NEVER report success without showing actual command output** — "should work" is not verification
## Step 0: Project Discovery (ALWAYS FIRST)
Read `mix.exs` — extract `deps/0`, `aliases/0`, and `cli/0` (for `preferred_envs`). Also check for `.check.exs`. See `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/project-discovery.md` for full patterns.
**Discover tools** (deps): `:credo`, `:dialyxir`, `:sobelow`, `:ex_check`, `:excoveralls`, `:boundary`
**Discover test commands** (aliases + deps):
- Unit: `mix test` (always), or custom alias like `mix test.with_coverage`
- E2E: `mix playwright.test`, `mix cypress.run`, or similar (check `preferred_envs` for `MIX_ENV`)
- Fast E2E: `mix playwright.run` (skips setup — for re-runs)
**Discover composite runner**: If `.check.exs` exists, read it — `mix check` may handle compile, format, credo, test, dialyzer, sobelow, and more.
Report discovery:
```
Project tools: compile ✓ | format ✓ | credo ✓ | dialyzer ✓ | sobelow ✓ | ex_check ✓
Test commands: mix test (unit) | mix playwright.test (E2E, MIX_ENV=int_test)
Composite runner: mix check (.check.exs covers: compiler, formatter, credo, dialyzer, sobelow, tests)
Strategy: Running `mix check` then asking about E2E
```
## Verification Sequence
Before using any discovered alias or composite command, confirm it runs:
1. Check the dependency is in `mix.lock` (not just `mix.exs`) — deps may not be fetched
2. Run the command — if it fails with "command not found" or dependency error, fall back to individual steps
3. Log the fallback: "mix check failed (ex_check not installed?), falling back to individual steps"
**If `ex_check` installed + `.check.exs` exists**: Try `mix check`. If it fails, fall back to individual steps.
**If composite alias found** (e.g., `mix ci`, `mix precommit`): Try it. If it fails, fall back to individual steps.
**Otherwise** (or after fallback): Run individual steps, skipping unavailable tools.
### Step 1: Compile
`mix compile --warnings-as-errors` — always
> **Elixir 1.20+ (OTP 27+)**: the compiler's built-in type checker emits **type
> violations / verified bugs** as warnings, so `--warnings-as-errors` now fails
> the build on them — no Dialyzer needed. If a previously-green build fails
> after a 1.20 bump, suspect a newly-detected type violation, not a regression.
> Read the message literally (accepted vs supplied type); it is almost always a
> real bug. See `elixir-idioms/references/elixir-120-type-system.md`.
### Step 2: Format
`mix format --check-formatted` — always (auto-fix with `mix format` if fails)
### Step 3: Credo
`mix credo --strict` — if `:credo` in deps, else skip
### Step 4: Test
`mix test --trace` — use project test alias if available
### Step 5: Dialyzer
`mix dialyzer` — if `:dialyxir` in deps, pre-PR only
### Step 6: Sobelow
`mix sobelow --config` — if `:sobelow` in deps
Skip unavailable tools with: "Credo: ⏭ Not installed"
### Step 7: Additional Test Offer
After core verification passes, check if project has additional test commands (E2E, integration, coverage). **Ask the user**:
```
Core verification passed. Additional test commands available:
1. mix playwright.test (E2E, MIX_ENV=int_test) — ~5min
2. mix test.with_coverage (unit + coverage report)
Run any of these? [1/2/both/skip]
```
Respect `preferred_envs` / `cli/0` for correct `MIX_ENV` on each command.
## Quick Reference
| Step | Command | Condition |
|------|---------|-----------|
| Discovery | Read `mix.exs` + `.check.exs` | Always first |
| Composite | `mix check` | If `:ex_check` installed |
| Compile | `mix compile --warnings-as-errors` | Always |
| Format | `mix format --check-formatted` | Always |
| Credo | `mix credo --strict` | `:credo` in deps |
| Test | `mix test --trace` | Always (use alias if exists) |
| Dialyzer | `mix dialyzer` | `:dialyxir` in deps, pre-PR |
| Sobelow | `mix sobelow --config` | `:sobelow` in deps |
| E2E/Extra | Ask user | If additional test commands found |
## Usage
1. Run `/phx:verify` — discovery happens automatically
2. Core checks run in order, adapted to project
3. After pass, offered additional test commands (E2E, coverage)
4. Commit only after all chosen checks passExcerpt, first 5,024 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 492f176
git clone https://github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix git -C claude-elixir-phoenix checkout 492f17636999
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 492f17636999 only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
492f17636999
Similar skills
All automation skills →oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Inspect LiveView socket assigns for memory bloat — missing temporary_assigns, unused assigns, unbounded lists needing streams, memory estimates. Use when LiveView memory grows or you need to add temporary_assigns.
oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Analyze Phoenix context boundaries and module coupling via mix xref. Use when checking cross-context calls, validating dependencies, before splitting modules, or reviewing architecture.
oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Brainstorm Elixir/Phoenix features — explore ideas, compare approaches, gather requirements. Use when vague idea, not sure how to approach, or want to discuss before plan.
oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Interactive briefing of a plan file — explains reasoning, schema decisions, component choices. Use when developers need to understand a plan before approving.
oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Claude Code plugin for Elixir/Phoenix/LiveView — 26 specialist agents, Iron Laws enforcement, and Tidewave MCP integration. Plan features with parallel research agents, execute with automatic verification, review with…
Questions about Verify
What does the Verify skill do?
Is Verify safe to install?
What can Verify access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/tree/main/plugins — the audited source at commit 492f17636999 and every finding aboveObserved · 18 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Verify skill do?
- Is Verify safe to install?
- What can Verify access on my machine?