Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Permissions

skill · oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenixMIT licenceAudited 18 Oct 2026 · source 492f17636999

★ 567pushed 2 days ago
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 18 Oct 2026 · 492f176
567repo stars · whole oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 492f17636999 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Recommend safe Bash permissions for Elixir mix commands in settings.json. Use when permission prompts slow workflow, "fix permissions", "reduce prompts", "auto-allow mix".

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Permissions (oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix)”. Retrieved 18 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/permissions

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 18 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low6 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS6
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (6)

INFOPrompt injectionprompt.authority_framing · references/risk-classification.md:143
F-01 Prompt injectionCWE-94 · CWE-1427Layer L2
| `sudo *` | Elevated privileges |
Why
No further detail recorded for this rule.
Fix
—
INFOSupply chainprompt.pipe_to_shell · SKILL.md:26
F-08 Supply chainCWE-829 · CWE-1357Layer L2
1. **NEVER auto-allow RED** — `rm`, `sudo`, `kill`, `curl|sh`, `mix ecto.reset`, `git push --force`, `chmod 777`
Why
No further detail recorded for this rule.
Fix
—
INFOSupply chainprompt.pipe_to_shell · SKILL.md:37
F-08 Supply chainCWE-829 · CWE-1357Layer L2
| RED | `rm -rf`, `sudo`, `kill`, `curl|sh`,`mix ecto.reset/drop`,`git push --force`,`git reset --hard` | Never recommend |
Why
No further detail recorded for this rule.
Fix
—
INFOSupply chainprompt.pipe_to_shell · references/risk-classification.md:152
F-08 Supply chainCWE-829 · CWE-1357Layer L2
| `curl * \| sh` | Remote code execution |
Why
No further detail recorded for this rule.
Fix
—
INFOSupply chainprompt.pipe_to_shell · references/risk-classification.md:153
F-08 Supply chainCWE-829 · CWE-1357Layer L2
| `wget * \| sh` | Remote code execution |
Why
No further detail recorded for this rule.
Fix
—
INFOSupply chainprompt.pipe_to_shell · references/risk-classification.md:154
F-08 Supply chainCWE-829 · CWE-1357Layer L2
| `curl * \| bash` | Remote code execution |
Why
No further detail recorded for this rule.
Fix
—

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 492f17636999 · 18 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publisheroliver-kriska GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderoliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/plugins/elixir-phoenix/skills/permissionsThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceMITAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict492f17636999A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 2 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Recommend safe Bash permissions for Elixir mix commands in settings.json. Use when permission prompts slow workflow, "fix permissions", "reduce prompts", "auto-allow mix".

---
name: permissions
description: Recommend safe Bash permissions for Elixir mix commands in settings.json. Use when permission prompts slow workflow, "fix permissions", "reduce prompts", "auto-allow mix".
argument-hint: "[--days=14] [--dry-run]"
effort: low
---

# Permission Analyzer

Scan recent session transcripts to find Bash commands you keep approving,
cross-reference with current `settings.json`, and recommend adding the missing ones.

**Primary goal**: Discover MISSING permissions from actual usage.
**Secondary goal**: Clean up redundant/garbage entries.

## Usage

`/phx:permissions [--days=14] [--dry-run]` — Scans session JSONL files, finds uncovered Bash commands, classifies risk, and recommends `settings.json` changes. Use `--dry-run` to preview without writing.

## Arguments

`$ARGUMENTS` — `--days=N` (default: 14), `--dry-run` (preview only).

## Iron Laws

1. **NEVER auto-allow RED** — `rm`, `sudo`, `kill`, `curl|sh`, `mix ecto.reset`, `git push --force`, `chmod 777`
2. **Evidence-based only** — Only recommend commands actually approved in sessions
3. **Show before writing** — Present full diff, get explicit confirmation
4. **Preserve existing** — Merge, never overwrite

## Risk Classification

| Level | Examples | Action |
|-------|----------|--------|
| GREEN | `ls`, `cat`, `grep`, `tail`, `which`, `mkdir`, `cd`, `mix test/compile/credo/format`, `git status/log/diff` | Auto-recommend |
| YELLOW | `git add/commit/push`, `mix ecto.migrate`, `mix deps.get`, `npm install`, `docker build/run`, `source`, `mise exec` | Recommend with note |
| RED | `rm -rf`, `sudo`, `kill`, `curl|sh`,`mix ecto.reset/drop`,`git push --force`,`git reset --hard` | Never recommend |

## Workflow

### Step 1: Extract Bash Commands from Session JSONL Files

Run the extraction script from `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/extraction-script.md`.
This scans all project JSONL files from the last N days, checks each Bash command
against current `settings.json` patterns, and reports uncovered commands with counts.

Run this before any settings cleanup — missing permissions are the primary goal.

### Step 2: Classify and Recommend

For each uncovered command from Step 1 output:

1. **Classify** as GREEN / YELLOW / RED per table above
2. **Generate permission pattern**: normalize to `Bash(base_command *)` format
   (use SPACE before `*`, NOT colon — `:*` is deprecated)
   - `mkdir -p` (94x) → `Bash(mkdir *)`
   - `mise exec` (39x) → `Bash(mise *)`
   - `tail -5` (20x) → `Bash(tail *)`
3. **Check for redundancy**: skip if a broader existing pattern covers it
4. **Also scan for garbage** in current settings: `Bash(done)`, `Bash(fi)`,
   `Bash(__NEW_LINE_*)`, partial heredocs, entries covered by broader patterns
5. **Fix deprecated `:*` patterns** — replace any `Bash(name:*)` with `Bash(name *)`
   (space before `*`). The `:*` suffix is deprecated and may not match reliably

Present a combined table:

```
## Permission Recommendations (last N days)

### ADD — Missing permissions (from session scan)
| Pattern to Add | Times Used | Risk | Example |
|...

### REMOVE — Redundant/garbage entries
| Entry | Reason |
|...

### RED — Require manual approval (not adding)
| Command | Count | Risk |
|...
```

### Step 3: Interactive Triage (unless `--dry-run`)

Walk through findings interactively using `AskUserQuestion`. Present items
in batches by risk level, starting with GREEN (safest):

**Batch 1 — GREEN items** (read-only, tests, safe tools):
Use `AskUserQuestion` with options:

- "Add all GREEN" — approve entire batch
- "Pick individually" — show each one for yes/no
- "Skip GREEN" — move to YELLOW

**Batch 2 — YELLOW items** (write ops, need caution):
Always show individually — one `AskUserQuestion` per item with options:

- "Add" — include in settings
- "Skip" — keep requiring manual approval
- "Customize" — let user edit the pattern before adding

**Batch 3 — REMOVE candidates** (garbage/redundant):
Use `AskUserQuestion` with options:

- "Remove all" — clean up entire batch
- "Pick individually" — show each for yes/no
- "Keep all" — skip cleanup

Track approved items in a list. After triage, show final summary of
what will be added/removed and ask for confirmation.

### Step 4: Apply

Merge approved additions into `~/.claude/settings.json` under `permissions.allow`.
Remove approved garbage entries. Report final counts.

### Workflow-artifact permissions (always check)

The plugin's workflow writes to `.claude/plans/`, `.claude/solutions/`, and
`.claude/reviews/`. If these aren't covered, `/phx:compound` and review agents
get write-blocked mid-workflow. Recommend (GREEN):
`Write(.claude/plans/**)`, `Write(.claude/solutions/**)`, `Write(.claude/reviews/**)`.

## References

- `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/risk-classification.md` — Full classification rules
- `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/settings-format.md` — Permission pattern format

## Related

Long mix output flooding context? `/phx:mix-compression` installs rtk filters
that compress `mix test/credo/dialyzer/compile` output before it reaches the
transcript (5-15% token savings on mix-heavy sessions).

Excerpt, first 5,122 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 492f176

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
git -C claude-elixir-phoenix checkout 492f17636999

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 492f17636999 only.

Works in which agents?

What its own text says, not a test

AgentStatusMore
Claude CodeMentioned in its text, not testedSkills for Claude Code · About Claude Code
“Mentioned” means the skill’s text names the agent. We have not run it there.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 492f17636999

README badge

For maintainers · shows the latest audit

ModelsAtlas: SAFE BMODELSATLASSAFE · B
[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/permissions/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/permissions/)

The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.

Assigns Audit✓SAFE

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

Inspect LiveView socket assigns for memory bloat — missing temporary_assigns, unused assigns, unbounded lists needing streams, memory estimates. Use when LiveView memory grows or you need to add temporary_assigns.

★ 567Grade B
Audit✓SAFE

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.

★ 567Grade B
Boundaries✓SAFE

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

Analyze Phoenix context boundaries and module coupling via mix xref. Use when checking cross-context calls, validating dependencies, before splitting modules, or reviewing architecture.

★ 567Grade B
Brainstorm✓SAFE

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

Brainstorm Elixir/Phoenix features — explore ideas, compare approaches, gather requirements. Use when vague idea, not sure how to approach, or want to discuss before plan.

★ 567Grade B
Brief✓SAFE

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

Interactive briefing of a plan file — explains reasoning, schema decisions, component choices. Use when developers need to understand a plan before approving.

★ 567Grade B
Call Tracing✓SAFE

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

Claude Code plugin for Elixir/Phoenix/LiveView — 26 specialist agents, Iron Laws enforcement, and Tidewave MCP integration. Plan features with parallel research agents, execute with automatic verification, review with…

★ 567Grade B

Add this badge to your README

[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/permissions/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/permissions/)

Questions about Permissions

What does the Permissions skill do?
Claude Code plugin for Elixir/Phoenix/LiveView — 26 specialist agents, Iron Laws enforcement, and Tidewave MCP integration. Plan features with parallel research agents, execute with automatic verification, review with 4-agent parallel audits, and capture learnings as reusable knowledge.
Is Permissions safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Permissions access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
What do I need installed to use Permissions?
Its own instructions reference source. Dependencies are pinned to exact versions.
Which assistants does Permissions work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (492f17636999), read on 2026-10-18. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.