Agent skill · Audited from source
Audit
skill · oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenixMIT licenceAudited 18 Oct 2026 · source 492f17636999
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 492f17636999 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Audit (oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix)”. Retrieved 18 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/audit
5 skills are called “Audit”. You are viewing oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix.
- oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix★ 567✓SAFE
- pbakaus/impeccable★ 87k✓SAFE
- nowork-studio/NotFair★ 3.9k✓SAFE
- javascript-mastery-pro/skills★ 1.5k✓SAFE
- vigolium/vigolium★ 1.1k✓SAFE
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 18 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 492f17636999 · 18 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- Publisheroliver-kriska GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderoliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/plugins/elixir-phoenix/skills/auditThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceMITAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict492f17636999A new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 2 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
---
name: audit
description: Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
effort: high
argument-hint: "[--quick|--full|--focus=area|--since=commit]"
---
# Project Health Audit
Comprehensive project-wide health assessment using 5 parallel specialist subagents.
## Usage
```
/phx:audit # Full audit (default)
/phx:audit --quick # 2-3 minute pulse check
/phx:audit --focus=security # Deep dive single area
/phx:audit --focus=performance
/phx:audit --since abc123 # Incremental audit since commit
/phx:audit --since HEAD~10 # Audit last 10 commits
```
## When to Use
- **Quarterly** health checks
- **Before major releases**
- **After large refactors**
- **New team member onboarding** (understand codebase health)
## Iron Laws
1. **Wait for ALL agents before synthesizing** — Partial results create misleading health scores because cross-category correlations get missed
2. **Scope agent prompts to specific directories** — Vague prompts like "analyze the codebase" produce generic findings that waste tokens and miss real issues
3. **Never compare scores across projects** — Scoring methodology depends on project size and maturity; only track trends within the same project
4. **Quick mode before full mode** — Run `--quick` first to catch compile/test failures before spending tokens on 5 parallel agents
## Subagent Architecture
Spawn 5 specialists in parallel using Agent tool. Three route to plugin
specialists with a declared model; the two categories without a specialist use
`general-purpose` pinned to `model: "sonnet"` — unpinned, they inherit the
session model (Opus by default):
| Subagent | Focus | Output File | Routes to |
|----------|-------|-------------|-----------|
| Architecture Reviewer | Structure quality, coupling, cohesion | `arch-review.md` | `phoenix-patterns-analyst` (sonnet) |
| Performance Auditor | N+1, indexes, bottlenecks, scalability | `perf-audit.md` | `general-purpose`, `model: "sonnet"` (no perf specialist yet) |
| Security Auditor | OWASP scan, auth patterns, secrets | `security-audit.md` | `security-analyzer` (opus) |
| Test Health Auditor | Coverage, quality, flaky tests | `test-audit.md` | `testing-reviewer` (sonnet) |
| Dependency Auditor | Vulnerabilities, outdated, unused | `deps-audit.md` | `general-purpose`, `model: "sonnet"` (`hex-deps-triager` is per-package only) |
## Workflow
### Step 1: Create Task List and Spawn All 5 Auditors (Parallel)
**If `TaskCreate` is in your tool list**, create Claude Code tasks for
progress visibility (Sonnet 5+ and Opus 4.8+ omit it unless
`CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TODO_TOOLS=1`; never ToolSearch for it — skip this block):
```
For each auditor:
TaskCreate({subject: "{Area} audit", activeForm: "Auditing {area}..."})
TaskUpdate({taskId, status: "in_progress"})
```
Then spawn all 5 agents with Agent tool (parallel). Route to declared-model
specialists where they exist, keep `general-purpose` only where no specialist
covers the audit category:
```
Agent(subagent_type: "phx:phoenix-patterns-analyst", prompt: "Architecture audit: analyze module structure, context boundaries, coupling, cohesion. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/arch-review.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "general-purpose", model: "sonnet", prompt: "Performance audit: N+1 queries, missing indexes, bottlenecks, scalability. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/perf-audit.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "phx:security-analyzer", prompt: "Security audit: OWASP scan, auth patterns, secret leakage. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/security-audit.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "phx:testing-reviewer", prompt: "Test health audit: coverage, quality, flakes. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/test-audit.md", run_in_background: true)
Agent(subagent_type: "general-purpose", model: "sonnet", prompt: "Dependency audit: vulnerabilities, outdated, unused. Write findings to .claude/audit/reports/deps-audit.md", run_in_background: true)
```
**Why specialist routing matters**: a `general-purpose` subagent without
`model:` inherits the session model — Opus on every plan since CC 2.1.280.
Plugin specialists declare their own model in frontmatter, and the two
`general-purpose` tracks pin `model: "sonnet"`, so no audit track runs on Opus.
**Agent prompts must be FOCUSED.** Scope each prompt to the
relevant directories and patterns. Do NOT give vague prompts
like "analyze the codebase."
**Output efficiency**: Tell each agent: "Report ONLY issues found.
Do NOT list clean checks, passing categories, or 'What's Good'.
One summary line per clean area suffices."
### Step 2: Collect Results
Wait for ALL auditors to complete — one completion notification per agent
spawned. If you created tasks, mark each `completed` as it finishes. NEVER
proceed while any auditor is still running.
Read reports from `.claude/audit/reports/`.
**Rate-limit circuit breaker:** if 2+ auditors return empty results or
rate-limit/API errors, STOP spawning. Synthesize from the reports that
exist, mark missing categories as "not audited (rate limit)", and tell
the user to re-run `/phx:audit` after the limit resets. Never leave the
user typing "continue" against dead agents.
### Step 3: Compress Findings
After all 5 auditors complete, spawn context-supervisor:
```
Agent(subagent_type: "phx:context-supervisor", prompt: """
Compress audit findings.
Input: .claude/audit/reports/
Output: .claude/audit/summaries/
Priority: Health scores per category, critical findings
only, cross-category correlations, deduplicate findings
found by 2+ agents.
""")
```
Read `.claude/audit/summaries/consolidated.md` for synthesis.
### Step 4: Calculate Health Score
Each category scores 0-100. See `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/scoring-methodology.md`.
### Step 5: Generate Report
WriteExcerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 492f176
git clone https://github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix git -C claude-elixir-phoenix checkout 492f17636999
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 492f17636999 only.
Works in which agents?
What its own text says, not a test
| Agent | Status | More |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | Mentioned in its text, not tested | Skills for Claude Code · About Claude Code |
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
492f17636999
README badge
For maintainers · shows the latest audit
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/audit/)
The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.
Similar skills
All automation skills →oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Inspect LiveView socket assigns for memory bloat — missing temporary_assigns, unused assigns, unbounded lists needing streams, memory estimates. Use when LiveView memory grows or you need to add temporary_assigns.
oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Analyze Phoenix context boundaries and module coupling via mix xref. Use when checking cross-context calls, validating dependencies, before splitting modules, or reviewing architecture.
oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Brainstorm Elixir/Phoenix features — explore ideas, compare approaches, gather requirements. Use when vague idea, not sure how to approach, or want to discuss before plan.
oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Interactive briefing of a plan file — explains reasoning, schema decisions, component choices. Use when developers need to understand a plan before approving.
oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Claude Code plugin for Elixir/Phoenix/LiveView — 26 specialist agents, Iron Laws enforcement, and Tidewave MCP integration. Plan features with parallel research agents, execute with automatic verification, review with…
oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix
Summarize and review what changed while you were away. Use after a weekend, vacation, or flight to check missed PRs, git commits, Linear tickets, and meetings — one prioritized brief, not a firehose.
Add this badge to your README
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/audit/)
<a href="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/audit/"><img src="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oliver-kriska/audit/badge.svg" alt="ModelsAtlas: SAFE B"></a>
Questions about Audit
What does the Audit skill do?
Is Audit safe to install?
What can Audit access on my machine?
Which assistants does Audit work with?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/tree/main/plugins — the audited source at commit 492f17636999 and every finding aboveObserved · 18 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Audit skill do?
- Is Audit safe to install?
- What can Audit access on my machine?