Agent skill · Audited from source
beautify-github-readme
skill · oil-oil/beautify-github-readmeMIT licenceAudited 20 Oct 2026 · source 7c101386314e
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 7c101386314e and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Redesign GitHub README homepages or create project-native pure SVG, hybrid SVG-composed PNG/WebP, and opt-in animated GIF assets. Use when a user asks to beautify, redesign, rebrand, visually upgrade, simplify, or audit…
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “beautify-github-readme (oil-oil/beautify-github-readme)”. Retrieved 20 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oil-oil/beautify-github-readme
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 20 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | PASS | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 7c101386314e · 20 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- Publisheroil-oil GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderoil-oil/beautify-github-readme/skills/beautify-github-readmeThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceMITAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict7c101386314eA new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 16 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Redesign GitHub README homepages or create project-native pure SVG, hybrid SVG-composed PNG/WebP, and opt-in animated GIF assets. Use when a user asks to beautify, redesign, rebrand, visually upgrade, simplify, or audit…
--- name: beautify-github-readme description: Redesign GitHub README homepages or create project-native pure SVG, hybrid SVG-composed PNG/WebP, and opt-in animated GIF assets. Use when a user asks to beautify, redesign, rebrand, visually upgrade, simplify, or audit a GitHub README; create only a hero, section headers, diagrams, badges, motion graphics, showcase modules, or other README assets; or turn a repository homepage into a cohesive visual story. If whole-README work versus asset-only work is unclear, ask which scope the user wants. For hero-like assets where pure SVG and generated raster material are both viable, explain the tradeoffs and confirm the implementation before creating the asset. --- # Beautify GitHub README Turn a repository homepage or requested visual asset into a concise, theme-specific visual story. Treat Markdown as the content layer, deterministic SVG as the layout system, and generated raster material as an optional visual ingredient. ## Workflow ### 1. Confirm the mode before editing Use exactly one execution mode: - **README mode** — improve the whole README: information order, copy hierarchy, proof, Markdown, and visual system. - **Asset-only mode** — create only the requested static SVG or visual asset set. Static SVG is the default. Only after the user explicitly opts into meaningful motion, optionally deliver a GitHub-safe GIF while keeping the SVG as the editable fallback. Do not rewrite, reorder, or embed anything in the README unless the user explicitly adds that scope. If the mode is not explicit, ask one compact question before making changes: > Would you like me to improve the whole README or only create visual assets? If asset-only, tell me whether you need a hero, section headers, workflow, badge, motion graphic, or a coordinated set. When a hero, badge, workflow, or diagram has meaningful motion and the user has not specified static or animated output, ask one compact follow-up: > Should this stay as a static SVG, or would you like a GitHub-safe GIF animation with the SVG kept as the editable fallback? GIF is opt-in and never the default. If the user declines, does not answer, or has no meaningful motion case, continue with static SVG only. Do not ask when motion would be purely decorative or the user already chose the output. Read-only inspection is allowed before the answer when it helps understand the repository. Do not interpret “use this Skill,” a repository path, or “beautify it” as permission to modify the whole README. Once the user chooses asset-only mode, expanding into README edits requires new authorization. If the user explicitly asks only for an audit, audit without editing and do not force the two-mode question. ### 2. Inspect before designing - Read the existing README, repository tree, package metadata, screenshots, examples, design tokens, logo, and real outputs. - In asset-only mode, inspect only the context needed to design the requested assets. Reading the README for context does not authorize changing it. - For a GitHub URL, inspect the current remote page and default branch before proposing changes. - Identify the audience, the problem solved, the clearest proof, the shortest path to first use, and any claims that lack evidence. - Preserve unrelated user changes. Start read-only; do not commit, push, rename, or publish without explicit authorization. ### 3. Confirm the visual implementation before creating hero-like assets For a hero, large banner, showcase board, or expressive title system where both implementations are viable, explain the difference and ask before producing the asset: > Which implementation would you like? > > - **Pure SVG** — fully deterministic, lightweight, sharply scalable, easy to edit, and best for typography, diagrams, code, icons, and geometric or pixel-art scenes. It does not use image generation and is weaker for realistic people, hair, organic texture, complex materials, or cinematic lighting. > - **Hybrid SVG composition** — use SVG for layout and typography, optionally use ImageGen for a project-specific raster subject, remove its background when appropriate, and compose the layers into a final PNG/WebP. It supports richer characters, materials, and lighting, but is heavier, partly stochastic, and requires generation plus visual validation. Keep the SVG layout source and transparent subject PNG. Do not ask this question when the user already chose an implementation, requested an audit, or the asset is obviously deterministic, such as a workflow, architecture diagram, badge, compact section header, or code-native illustration. Do not suggest hybrid composition merely to add decoration. Prefer real screenshots, outputs, logos, or existing project art over generated material. If the user delegates the decision, default to pure SVG unless generated or photographic material clearly communicates the repository's identity or mechanism better. Do not begin ImageGen work until the user selects hybrid composition or explicitly delegates the choice. Hybrid composition is an implementation source, not normally the published SVG. Relative raster references inside SVG are unreliable across renderers, while base64-embedded raster layers can make the SVG unnecessarily large. Publish the verified final PNG/WebP by default and keep the SVG layout plus raster layers as editable sources. ### 4. Extract the project story Write these before drawing: ```text Audience: One-sentence value: Primary proof: First successful action: Visual theme: ``` Do not invent adoption, benchmarks, compatibility, testimonials, or features. Prefer a real screenshot, output, diagram, or generated artifact over decorative stock imagery. ### 5. Define a theme-specific visual system Read [references/visual-direction.md](references/visual-direction.md). Freeze a compact art-direction spec: ```text Palette: background / foreground / primary / accent / muted Typography: system font stack / scale / weight contrast S
Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 7c10138
git clone https://github.com/oil-oil/beautify-github-readme git -C beautify-github-readme checkout 7c101386314e
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 7c101386314e only.
Works in which agents?
What its own text says, not a test
| Agent | Status | More |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor | Mentioned in its text, not tested | Skills for Cursor · About Cursor |
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
7c101386314e
README badge
For maintainers · shows the latest audit
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oil-oil/beautify-github-readme/)
The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.
Similar skills
All design & front-end skills →yusufkaraaslan/Skill_Seekers
Convert documentation websites, GitHub repositories, and PDFs into Claude AI skills with automatic conflict detection
yusufkaraaslan/Skill_Seekers
Convert documentation websites, GitHub repositories, and PDFs into Claude AI skills with automatic conflict detection
yusufkaraaslan/Skill_Seekers
Convert documentation websites, GitHub repositories, and PDFs into Claude AI skills with automatic conflict detection
yusufkaraaslan/Skill_Seekers
Automatically detect source types and build AI skills using Skill Seekers. Use when the user wants to create skills from documentation, repos, PDFs, videos, or other knowledge sources.
yusufkaraaslan/Skill_Seekers
Automatically detect source types and build AI skills using Skill Seekers. Use when the user wants to create skills from documentation, repos, PDFs, videos, or other knowledge sources.
XiaoMaColtAI/math-modeling-skill
当用户要求数学建模、建模竞赛、建模分析、代码求解、结果可视化或生成数学建模论文时使用。支持完整三阶段流程、单独执行任一角色,以及在关键节点使用独立 Subagent 进行阶段内质检;默认只启用质检 Subagent,用户可明确选择额外协作。
Add this badge to your README
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oil-oil/beautify-github-readme/)
<a href="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oil-oil/beautify-github-readme/"><img src="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/oil-oil/beautify-github-readme/badge.svg" alt="ModelsAtlas: SAFE B"></a>
Questions about beautify-github-readme
What does the beautify-github-readme skill do?
Is beautify-github-readme safe to install?
What can beautify-github-readme access on my machine?
Which assistants does beautify-github-readme work with?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/oil-oil/beautify-github-readme/tree/main/skills/beaut — the audited source at commit 7c101386314e and every finding aboveObserved · 20 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the beautify-github-readme skill do?
- Is beautify-github-readme safe to install?
- What can beautify-github-readme access on my machine?