Frontend TestingCAUTION
Skyroc 是一个基于 React 19 + TypeScript 的跨端前端工程化 monorepo:既提供开箱即用的 Web 中后台模板(Admin / RuoYi 对接版)和 Expo 移动端业务模板,也把请求、状态、日志、主题、双端 UI 组件库等能力沉淀为边界清晰的 workspace 包。
Overview
Skyroc 是一个基于 React 19 + TypeScript 的跨端前端工程化 monorepo:既提供开箱即用的 Web 中后台模板(Admin / RuoYi 对接版)和 Expo 移动端业务模板,也把请求、状态、日志、主题、双端 UI 组件库等能力沉淀为边界清晰的 workspace 包。
99ce7f1c7a8eOBSERVED · 2026-10-12Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| codex | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: frontend-testing
description: Generate Vitest + React Testing Library tests for Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities. Triggers on testing, spec files, coverage, Vitest, RTL, unit tests, integration tests, or write/review test requests.
---
# Dify Frontend Testing Skill
This skill enables Codex to generate high-quality, comprehensive frontend tests for the Dify project following established conventions and best practices.
> **⚠️ Authoritative Source**: This skill is derived from `web/testing/testing.md`. Use Vitest mock/timer APIs (`vi.*`).
## When to Apply This Skill
Apply this skill when the user:
- Asks to **write tests** for a component, hook, or utility
- Asks to **review existing tests** for completeness
- Mentions **Vitest**, **React Testing Library**, **RTL**, or **spec files**
- Requests **test coverage** improvement
- Uses `pnpm analyze-component` output as context
- Mentions **testing**, **unit tests**, or **integration tests** for frontend code
- Wants to understand **testing patterns** in the Dify codebase
**Do NOT apply** when:
- User is asking about backend/API tests (Python/pytest)
- User is asking about E2E tests (Playwright/Cypress)
- User is only asking conceptual questions without code context
## Quick Reference
### Tech Stack
| Tool | Version | Purpose |
|------|---------|---------|
| Vitest | 4.0.16 | Test runner |
| React Testing Library | 16.0 | Component testing |
| jsdom | - | Test environment |
| nock | 14.0 | HTTP mocking |
| TypeScript | 5.x | Type safety |
### Key Commands
```bash
# Run all tests
pnpm test
# Watch mode
pnpm test:watch
# Run specific file
pnpm test path/to/file.spec.tsx
# Generate coverage report
pnpm test:coverage
# Analyze component complexity
pnpm analyze-component <path>
# Review existing test
pnpm analyze-component <path> --review
```
### File Naming
- Test files: `ComponentName.spec.tsx` (same directory as component)
- Integration tests: `web/__tests__/` directory
## Test Structure Template
```typescript
import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import Component from './index'
// ✅ Import real project components (DO NOT mock these)
// import Loading from '@/app/components/base/loading'
// import { ChildComponent } from './child-component'
// ✅ Mock external dependencies only
vi.mock('@/service/api')
vi.mock('next/navigation', () => ({
useRouter: () => ({ push: vi.fn() }),
usePathname: () => '/test',
}))
// ✅ Zustand stores: Use real stores (auto-mocked globally)
// Set test state with: useAppStore.setState({ ... })
// Shared state for mocks (if needed)
let mockSharedState = false
describe('ComponentName', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks() // ✅ Reset mocks BEFORE each test
mockSharedState = false // ✅ Reset shared state
})
// Rendering tests (REQUIRED)
describe('Rendering', () => {
it('should render without crashing', () => {
// Arrange
const props = { title: 'Test' }
// Act
render(<Component {...props} />)
// Assert
expect(screen.getByText('Test')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
// Props tests (REQUIRED)
describe('Props', () => {
it('should apply custom className', () => {
render(<Component className="custom" />)
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('custom')
})
})
// User Interactions
describe('User Interactions', () => {
it('should handle click events', () => {
const handleClick = vi.fn()
render(<Component onClick={handleClick} />)
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
})
// Edge Cases (REQUIRED)
describe('Edge Cases', () => {
it('should handle null data', () => {
render(<Component data={null} />)
expect(screen.getByText(/no data/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should handle empty array', () => {
render(<Component items={[]} />)
expect(screen.getByText(/empty/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
})
```
## Testing Workflow (CRITICAL)
### ⚠️ Incremental Approach Required
**NEVER generate all test files at once.** For complex components or multi-file directories:
1. **Analyze & Plan**: List all files, order by complexity (simple → complex)
1. **Process ONE at a time**: Write test → Run test → Fix if needed → Next
1. **Verify before proceeding**: Do NOT continue to next file until current passes
```
For each file:
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Write test │
│ 2. Run: pnpm test <file>.spec.tsx │
│ 3. PASS? → Mark complete, next file │
│ FAIL? → Fix first, then continue │
└────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
### Complexity-Based Order
Process in this order for multi-file testing:
1. 🟢 Utility functions (simplest)
1. 🟢 Custom hooks
1. 🟡 Simple components (presentational)
1. 🟡 Medium components (state, effects)
1. 🔴 Complex components (API, routing)
1. 🔴 Integration tests (index files - last)
### When to Refactor First
- **Complexity > 50**: Break into smaller pieces before testing
- **500+ lines**: Consider splitting before testing
- **Many dependencies**: Extract logic into hooks first
> 📖 See `references/workflow.md` for complete workflow details and todo list format.
## Testing Strategy
### Path-Level Testing (Directory Testing)
When assigned to test a directory/path, test **ALL content** within that path:
- Test all components, hooks, utilities in the directory (not just `index` file)
- Use incremental approach: one file at a time, verify each before proceeding
- Goal: 100% coverage of ALL files in the directory
### Integration Testing First
**Prefer integration testing** when writing tests for a directory:
- ✅ **Import real project components** directly (including base components and siblings)
- ✅ **Only mock**: API services (`@/service/*`), `next/navigation`, complex context providers
- ❌ **DO Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
.claude/skills/design-taste-frontend
.claude/skills/migrate-nativewind-to-uniwind
.claude/skills/migrate-oxfmt
.claude/skills/migrate-oxlint
.claude/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/data
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
99ce7f1c7a8efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/ohh-889__frontend-testing.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 99ce7f1c7a8e | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Frontend Testing skill do?
Skyroc 是一个基于 React 19 + TypeScript 的跨端前端工程化 monorepo:既提供开箱即用的 Web 中后台模板(Admin / RuoYi 对接版)和 Expo 移动端业务模板,也把请求、状态、日志、主题、双端 UI 组件库等能力沉淀为边界清晰的 workspace 包。
Is Frontend Testing safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Frontend Testing access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Frontend Testing work with?
Its documentation mentions codex. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (99ce7f1c7a8e), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.