Nw Sd Case StudiesSAFE
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
Overview
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
1a864ec81cdeOBSERVED · 2026-10-14Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| cursor | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: nw-sd-case-studies
description: 25 real-world system design case studies condensed from Alex Xu's System Design Interview Vol 1 and 2 - requirements, architecture, deep dive insights, key takeaways
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# System Design Case Studies
Reference catalog of 25 real-world designs. Use when designing a similar system or needing precedent for architectural decisions.
---
## Volume 1 Case Studies
### Rate Limiter
**Scale**: API gateway middleware | **Core**: Token Bucket (industry standard) or Sliding Window Counter | **Storage**: Redis counters with TTL | **Distributed**: Lua scripts for atomic increment | **Key insight**: cross-cutting concern, belongs in middleware/gateway | **Headers**: 429 + Retry-After + X-RateLimit-Remaining
### Consistent Hashing
**Core**: hash ring 0 to 2^32-1, servers at positions, keys walk clockwise | **Virtual nodes**: 100-200 per server, reduces load deviation from ~40% to ~5% | **Used in**: DynamoDB, Cassandra, Akamai, Discord | **Key insight**: never deploy without virtual nodes
### Key-Value Store (Dynamo-style)
**Core**: consistent hashing for partitioning, N replicas on clockwise nodes, quorum W+R>N | **Conflict**: vector clocks, LWW, app-level merge | **Failures**: sloppy quorum + hinted handoff (temp), Merkle trees + anti-entropy (permanent), gossip for detection | **Write path**: WAL -> memtable -> SSTable (LSM-tree) | **Read path**: memtable -> Bloom filter -> SSTable(s)
### Unique ID Generator
**Winner**: Snowflake -- 64-bit, sortable, minimal coordination | `[1 unused | 41 timestamp | 5 DC | 5 machine | 12 sequence]` ~4M IDs/sec/DC | **Weakness**: clock sync (NTP) | **Alt**: UUID (128-bit, not sortable), ticket server (SPOF)
### URL Shortener
**Scale**: 100M/day ~ 1,160 QPS write, 11,600 read | **Short URL**: base62 with 7 chars = 3.5T combinations | **Approaches**: hash + collision resolution | base62 from auto-increment ID | pre-generated key service | **Redirect**: 301 (cached, no analytics) vs 302 (every click tracked) -- most use 302 | **Key**: caching critical (heavy-tailed distribution)
### Web Crawler
**Scale**: 1B pages/month ~ 400 pages/sec, 500TB storage/month | **Core**: URL Frontier with priority queues (importance) + politeness queues (per-domain rate limit) | **Dedup**: SHA-256 exact, simhash/MinHash near-duplicate | **Traps**: URL length limit, max depth, blacklist | **Key insight**: URL frontier is the most important component
### Notification System
**Scale**: 10M push, 1M SMS, 5M email/day | **Architecture**: Services -> Message Queue -> Workers -> Third-party (APNs, FCM, Twilio, SES) | **Reliability**: persist before sending, retry with exponential backoff, dedup via event_id | **Key**: decouple creation from delivery; user preferences are critical
### News Feed
**Core**: hybrid fan-out -- push for normal users (<10K followers), pull for celebrities | **Feed cache**: pre-computed for most users, celebrity posts merged at read time | **Ranking**: chronological simplest; ML-based for engagement optimization | **Pagination**: cursor-based (not offset) | **Media**: object storage + CDN
### Chat System
**Scale**: 50M DAU | **Protocol**: WebSocket (bidirectional, persistent) | **Storage**: KV store (HBase-like), partition by channel_id | **1-on-1**: message via WebSocket -> store -> push to recipient (or notification if offline) | **Group (<100)**: fan-out on write to member inboxes | **Presence**: heartbeat every 5s, offline after 30s missed, lazy propagation for large friend lists | **Multi-device**: per-device cursor of last-read message
### Search Autocomplete
**Scale**: 24K QPS avg, 48K peak | **Core**: trie with cached top-K at each node, O(prefix_length) query | **Update**: offline aggregation (weekly rebuild), NOT real-time; separate trending pipeline | **Scaling**: shard by first character(s), replicate each shard | **Client**: debounce 100-200ms, cache recent results, pre-fetch
### YouTube (Video Platform)
**Scale**: 5M DAU, 150TB storage/day | **Upload**: upload -> transcoding queue -> workers (DAG pipeline: split->encode->merge) -> object storage -> CDN | **Streaming**: adaptive bitrate (DASH/HLS), manifest + segment-based | **Transcoding**: multiple resolutions (360p-4K) + formats (H.264, VP9, AV1) | **Cost**: popular videos on CDN, long-tail from origin; encode popular formats eagerly
### Google Drive (Cloud Storage)
**Scale**: 50M users, 500PB total | **Core optimization**: block-level sync -- split files into ~4MB blocks, detect changed blocks (delta sync), upload only changed | **Notification**: long polling for sync events | **Dedup**: same block hash = same storage across users | **Versioning**: store block lists per version, not full copies | **Conflict**: first upload wins, second gets notification, user resolves
---
## Volume 2 Case Studies
### Proximity Service (Yelp)
**Scale**: 100M DAU, 200M businesses | **Core**: geospatial indexing -- geohash (string prefix queries, DB-friendly) or quadtree (adaptive density, in-memory ~1.7GB) | **Boundary problem**: geohash neighbors may have different prefixes -- query target + 8 neighbors | **Architecture**: separate LBS (read-heavy, stateless) from Business Service (CRUD)
### Nearby Friends
**Scale**: 10M concurrent, 334K location updates/sec | **Core**: Pub/Sub with geohash-based channels (not per-user -- too many) | **Connection**: WebSocket (bidirectional, persistent) | **Location cache**: Redis with TTL 60s | **Optimization**: subscribe to own geohash cell + 8 neighbors; resubscribe on cell change
### Google Maps
**Map rendering**: pre-rendered tile pyramid (zoom N = 4^N tiles), served via CDN | **Tile addressing**: `/tiles/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png` | **Routing**: hierarchical graph (local -> regional -> interstate), not naive Dijkstra -- Contraction Hierarchies | **ETA**: base distance/speed + real-time traffic + historical patterns + ML | **Traffic**: crowdsourced GPS traces, aggregated per road Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
1a864ec81cdefull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/nwave-ai__nw-sd-case-studies.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | 1a864ec81cde | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Nw Sd Case Studies skill do?
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
Is Nw Sd Case Studies safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Nw Sd Case Studies access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Nw Sd Case Studies work with?
Its documentation mentions cursor. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (1a864ec81cde), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.