Nw Query OptimizationSAFE
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
Overview
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
1a864ec81cdeOBSERVED · 2026-10-14Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| cursor | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: nw-query-optimization
description: SQL and NoSQL query optimization techniques, indexing strategies, execution plan analysis, JOIN algorithms, cardinality estimation, and database-specific query patterns
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# Query Optimization
## Cost-Based Optimization
Modern relational DBs use cost-based optimizers (CBO): generate plan candidates -> estimate cost via statistics (row counts, distributions, selectivity) -> select lowest I/O/CPU/memory plan. Stale statistics lead to suboptimal plans.
### Execution Plan Analysis
Validate optimization with EXPLAIN before and after changes.
```sql
-- PostgreSQL (add ANALYZE for actual runtime stats)
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT order_id, total FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345;
-- MySQL: EXPLAIN FORMAT=JSON ... | SQL Server: SET STATISTICS IO ON
```
Key indicators: **Seq Scan/Table Scan** = missing index | **Index Scan/Seek** = efficient | **Hash Join** = large equality joins | **Nested Loop** = small/indexed inner | **Merge Join** = pre-sorted inputs | **Sort** = watch disk spills
## Indexing Strategies
### B-Tree (Default)
Supports: equality, range, sorting, prefix matching | O(log n) lookup | General-purpose, all major DBs default
### Hash
Equality only | O(1) lookup | High-cardinality exact-match | No range/sorting/pattern support
### Covering Indexes
Include all query columns in index -> eliminates table access (index-only scan) | Trade-off: larger index, slower writes
```sql
-- Covering index for: SELECT name, email FROM users WHERE status = 'active'
CREATE INDEX idx_users_status_covering ON users(status) INCLUDE (name, email);
```
### PostgreSQL Specialized
- **GiST**: Geometric data, full-text search, nearest-neighbor
- **GIN**: Arrays, full-text search, JSONB queries
- **BRIN**: Large tables with physically correlated data (timestamps), minimal storage
- **SP-GiST**: Non-balanced structures, point-based geometric queries
### Compound Index Design
Order by: 1. Equality conditions first (highest selectivity) | 2. Sort columns second | 3. Range conditions last
### MongoDB ESR Rule
Equality-Sort-Range ordering for compound indexes:
```javascript
// Query: status = "A", qty > 20, sorted by item
// Optimal index:
db.collection.createIndex({ status: 1, item: 1, qty: 1 })
// E(quality) S(ort) R(ange)
```
## SQL Optimization Patterns
### Select Only Needed Columns
```sql
-- Bad: SELECT * retrieves unnecessary data, prevents covering indexes
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345;
-- Good: Specify columns, enables covering index
SELECT order_id, order_date, total FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345;
```
### Other Key Patterns
- **CTEs**: Improve readability but not always performance -- PostgreSQL may materialize CTEs (pre-v12), MySQL inlines them
- **Window functions**: Use `SUM() OVER`, `RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY ...)` for analytics without self-joins
- **Pagination**: Prefer keyset (`WHERE id > last_seen ORDER BY id LIMIT N`) over OFFSET for deep pages
- **Parameterized queries**: Prevent SQL injection AND enable plan caching (`cursor.execute("... WHERE id = %s", (id,))`)
## JOIN Algorithm Selection
| Algorithm | Best When | Cost |
|-----------|-----------|------|
| Nested Loop | Small outer table, indexed inner table | O(n * m) worst, O(n * log m) with index |
| Hash Join | Large tables, equality joins, no useful indexes | O(n + m) build + probe |
| Merge Join | Both inputs already sorted (index order) | O(n + m) after sort |
## Cardinality Estimation
Optimizer predicts row counts using: **Histograms** (value distribution) | **Density vectors** (non-histogram columns) | **Statistics objects** via ANALYZE (PostgreSQL) / UPDATE STATISTICS (SQL Server)
When estimation is wrong (correlated columns, skewed data, multi-table joins): 1. Run ANALYZE/UPDATE STATISTICS | 2. Create multi-column statistics | 3. Query hints as last resort
## NoSQL Query Optimization
### MongoDB
Place `$match`/`$project` early in pipelines | Use `$lookup` sparingly (left outer joins) | Compound indexes following ESR | Validate with `explain("executionStats")`
### Cassandra
Always include partition key | Design tables around query patterns (query-first) | Use SAI over SASI (43% throughput gain) | Avoid ALLOW FILTERING (full cluster scan) | Materialized views add write overhead
### DynamoDB
Use Query not Scan | Design partition keys for even distribution | GSIs for alternative access patterns | Single-table design with composite sort keys
### Redis
FT.SEARCH for complex queries (RediSearch module) | Design key naming for efficient SCAN | Use pipelining for batch ops
## Anti-Patterns to Detect
- **SELECT ***: Wastes I/O, prevents covering indexes
- **Missing indexes** on WHERE/JOIN/ORDER BY columns: full table scans
- **N+1 queries**: Fetch in loops instead of JOINs/batch
- **Implicit type conversions**: Prevents index use (WHERE varchar_col = 123)
- **Functions on indexed columns**: `WHERE UPPER(name) = 'JOHN'` blocks index; use function-based indexes
- **Missing pagination**: Unbounded result sets
- **Hot partitions** (NoSQL): Low-cardinality partition keys concentrate load
- **ALLOW FILTERING** (Cassandra): Expensive full-cluster scans
- **Large partitions** (Cassandra): >100MB degrades performanceTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
1a864ec81cdefull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/nwave-ai__nw-query-optimization.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | 1a864ec81cde | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Nw Query Optimization skill do?
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
Is Nw Query Optimization safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Nw Query Optimization access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Nw Query Optimization work with?
Its documentation mentions cursor. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (1a864ec81cde), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.