Agent skill · Audited from source

add-task

skill · neolabhq/context-engineering-kitGPL-3.0 licenceAudited 21 Oct 2026 · source c64c9eb3b29e

★ 1,781pushed 55 days ago
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 21 Oct 2026 · c64c9eb
1,781repo stars · whole neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit c64c9eb3b29e and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “add-task (neolabhq/context-engineering-kit)”. Retrieved 21 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/neolabhq/add-task

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 21 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha c64c9eb3b29e · 21 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publisherneolabhq GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderneolabhq/context-engineering-kit/skills/add-taskThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceGPL-3.0As the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdictc64c9eb3b29eA new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 55 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent

---
name: add-task
description: creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent
---

# Create Draft Task File

## Role

Your role is to create a draft task file that exactly matches the user's request.

## Goal

Create a task file in `.specs/tasks/draft/` with:

- Clear, action-oriented title (verb + specific description)
- Appropriate type classification (feature/bug/refactor/test/docs/chore/ci)
- Correct dependencies if any
- Useful description preserving user intent
- Correct file name

## Input

- **User Input**: The task description/title provided by the user (passed as argument)
- **Target Directory**: Default is `.specs/tasks/draft/`

## Instructions

### 1. Ensure Directory Structure

Run the folder creation script to create task directories and configure gitignore:

```bash
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/create-folders.sh
```

This creates:

- `.specs/tasks/draft/` - New tasks awaiting analysis
- `.specs/tasks/todo/` - Tasks ready to implement
- `.specs/tasks/in-progress/` - Currently being worked on
- `.specs/tasks/done/` - Completed tasks
- `.specs/scratchpad/` - Temporary working files (gitignored)
- `.specs/analysis/` - Analysis of the task
- `.specs/reports/` - Reports of the task

Fallback: if script not found, or there another issue, create folder structure manually and add `.specs/scratchpad/` to .gitignore

### 2. Analyze Input

1. **Parse the user's request**:
   - Extract the core task objective
   - Identify implied type (bug, feature, task)
   - List of task files that this task depends on

2. **Clarify if ambiguous** (only if truly unclear):
   - Is this a bug fix or new feature?
   - Any related tasks or dependencies? (if not proided, then assume none)

### 3. Structure the Task

1. **Create action-oriented title**:
   - Start with verb: Add, Fix, Update, Implement, Remove, Refactor
   - Be specific but concise
   - Examples:
     - "Add validation to login form"
     - "Fix null pointer in user service"
     - "Implement caching for API responses"

2. **Determine type**:

   | Type | Use When |
   |------|----------|
   | `feature` | New functionality or capability |
   | `bug` | Something is broken or not working correctly |
   | `refactor` | Code restructuring without changing behavior |
   | `test` | Adding or updating tests |
   | `docs` | Documentation changes only |
   | `chore` | Maintenance tasks, dependency updates |
   | `ci` | CI/CD configuration changes |

### 4. Generate File Name

1. **Create short name from the task title**:
   - Lowercase the title
   - Replace spaces with hyphens
   - Remove special characters
   - Keep it concise (3-5 words max)
   - Example: "Add validation to login form" -> `add-validation-login-form`

2. **Form file name**: `<short-name>.<issue-type>.md`
   - Examples:
     - `add-validation-login-form.feature.md`
     - `fix-null-pointer-user-service.bug.md`
     - `restructure-auth-module.refactor.md`
     - `add-unit-tests-api.test.md`
     - `update-readme.docs.md`
     - `upgrade-dependencies.chore.md`
     - `add-github-actions.ci.md`

3. **Verify uniqueness**: Check `.specs/tasks/draft/`, `.specs/tasks/todo/`, `.specs/tasks/in-progress/`, and `.specs/tasks/done/` for existing files with same name

### 5. Create Task File

**Use Write tool** to create `.specs/tasks/todo/<short-name>.<issue-type>.md`:

```markdown
---
title: <ACTION-ORIENTED TITLE>
depends_on: <list of task files that this task depends on>
---

## Initial User Prompt

{EXACT user input as provided}

## Description

// Will be filled in future stages by business analyst
```

## Constraints

- **Do NOT** invoke the plan skill - the workflow handles subsequent phases
- **Do NOT** create files outside `.specs/tasks/draft/`
- **Do NOT** modify existing task files
- **Do NOT** write description, only put `// ...` placeholder as specified in the task file.
- **Do NOT** write depends_on section if no dependencies are provided.

## Expected Output

Return to the orchestrator:

1. **Task file path**: Full path to created file (e.g., `.specs/tasks/todo/add-validation-login-form.feature.md`)
2. **Generated title**: The action-oriented title created
3. **Issue type**: `task`, `bug`, or `feature`

Format:

```
Created task file: .specs/tasks/draft/<name>.<type>.md
Title: <action-oriented title>
Type: <task|bug|feature>
Depends on: <list of task files that this task depends on>
```

## Success Criteria

- [ ] Directories `.specs/tasks/draft/`, `.specs/tasks/todo/`, `.specs/tasks/in-progress/`, `.specs/tasks/done/` exist
- [ ] Task file created in `.specs/tasks/draft/` with correct naming convention (`<name>.<type>.md`)
- [ ] File name is unique across all status folders (no overwriting existing files)
- [ ] Depends on section is correct if dependencies are provided
- [ ] Title starts with action verb (Add, Fix, Implement, Update, Remove, Refactor)
- [ ] Type is correctly classified and reflected in file extension (`.feature.md`, `.bug.md`, `.refactor.md`, `.test.md`, `.docs.md`, `.chore.md`, `.ci.md`)
- [ ] Original user input preserved in "Initial User Prompt" section
- [ ] Description is empty placeholder `// Will be filled in future stages by business analyst`

## Examples

**Test task** (`.specs/tasks/draft/add-unit-tests-auth.test.md`):

```markdown
---
title: Add unit tests for auth module
---

## Initial User Prompt

add tests for auth

## Description

// Will be filled in future stages by business analyst
```

**Bug with context** (`.specs/tasks/draft/fix-login-timeout.bug.md`):

```markdown
---
title: Fix login timeout on slow connections
---

## Initial User Prompt

users getting 504 errors on slow wifi

## Description

// Will be filled in future stages by business analyst
```

**Feature request** (`.specs/tasks/draft/implement-dark-mode.feature.md`):

```markdown
---
title: Implement dark mode toggle
---

## Initial User Prompt

add dark mode to settings page

## Description

// Will be filled in future stages by business analys

Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit c64c9eb

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit
git -C context-engineering-kit checkout c64c9eb3b29e

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit c64c9eb3b29e only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source c64c9eb3b29e

README badge

For maintainers · shows the latest audit

ModelsAtlas: SAFE BMODELSATLASSAFE · B
[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/neolabhq/add-task/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/neolabhq/add-task/)

The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.

Similar skills

Add this badge to your README

[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/neolabhq/add-task/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/neolabhq/add-task/)

Questions about add-task

What does the add-task skill do?
Hand-crafted Claude Code Skills focused on improving agent results quality. Compatible with OpenCode, Cursor, Antigravity, Gemini CLI, and others. Includes CodeRabbit open-source alternative.
Is add-task safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can add-task access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (c64c9eb3b29e), read on 2026-10-21. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.