Agent skill · Audited from source

actualize

skill · neolabhq/context-engineering-kitGPL-3.0 licenceAudited 20 Oct 2026 · source c64c9eb3b29e

★ 1,780pushed 54 days ago
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 20 Oct 2026 · c64c9eb
1,780repo stars · whole neolabhq/context-engineering-kit

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit c64c9eb3b29e and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Reconcile the project's FPF state with recent repository changes

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “actualize (neolabhq/context-engineering-kit)”. Retrieved 20 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/neolabhq/actualize

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 20 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha c64c9eb3b29e · 20 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publisherneolabhq GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderneolabhq/context-engineering-kit/skills/actualizeThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceGPL-3.0As the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdictc64c9eb3b29eA new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 54 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Reconcile the project's FPF state with recent repository changes

---
name: actualize
description: "Reconcile the project's FPF state with recent repository changes"
---

# Actualize Knowledge Base

This command is a core part of maintaining a living assurance case. It keeps your FPF knowledge base (`.fpf/`) in sync with the evolving reality of your project's codebase.

The command performs a three-part audit against recent git changes to surface potential context drift, stale evidence, and outdated decisions. This aligns with the **Observe** phase of the FPF Canonical Evolution Loop (B.4) and helps manage **Epistemic Debt** (B.3.4).

## Action (Run-Time)

### Step 1: Check Git Changes

Run git commands to identify changes since last actualization:

```bash
# Get current commit hash
git rev-parse HEAD

# Check for changes since last known baseline
# (Read .fpf/.baseline file if it exists, otherwise use initial commit)
git diff --name-only <baseline_commit> HEAD

# List all changed files
git diff --stat <baseline_commit> HEAD
```

### Step 2: Analyze Report for Context Drift

1. Review changed files for core project configuration:
   - `package.json`, `go.mod`, `Cargo.toml`, `requirements.txt`
   - `Dockerfile`, `docker-compose.yml`
   - `.env.example`, config files

2. If configuration files changed:
   - Re-read project structure (README, config files)
   - Compare detected context with `.fpf/context.md`
   - Present diff to user

3. Ask user if they want to update `context.md`

### Step 3: Analyze Report for Evidence Staleness (Epistemic Debt)

1. Read all evidence files in `.fpf/evidence/`
2. Check `carrier_ref` field in each evidence file
3. Cross-reference with changed files from git diff
4. If a referenced file changed:
   - Flag the evidence as **STALE**
   - Note which hypothesis is affected

### Step 4: Analyze Report for Decision Relevance

1. Read all DRR files in `.fpf/decisions/`
2. Trace back to source evidence and hypothesis files
3. If foundational files changed:
   - Flag the DRR as **POTENTIALLY OUTDATED**

### Step 5: Update Baseline

Create/update `.fpf/.baseline` file:

```
# FPF Actualization Baseline
# Last actualized: 2025-01-15T16:00:00Z
commit: abc123def456
```

### Step 6: Present Findings

Output a structured report:

```markdown
## Actualization Report

**Baseline**: abc123 (2025-01-10)
**Current**: def456 (2025-01-15)
**Files Changed**: 42

### Context Drift

The following configuration files have changed:
- package.json (+5 dependencies)
- Dockerfile (base image updated)

**Action Required**: Review and update `.fpf/context.md` if constraints have changed.

### Stale Evidence (3 items)

| Evidence | Hypothesis | Changed File |
|----------|------------|--------------|
| ev-benchmark-api | api-optimization | src/api/handler.ts |
| ev-test-auth | auth-module | src/auth/login.ts |
| ev-perf-db | db-indexing | migrations/002.sql |

**Action Required**: Re-validate to refresh evidence for affected hypotheses.

### Decisions to Review (1 item)

| DRR | Affected By |
|-----|-------------|
| DRR-2025-01-10-api-design | src/api/handler.ts changed |

**Action Required**: Consider re-evaluating decision via `/fpf:propose-hypotheses`.

### Summary

- Context drift detected: YES
- Stale evidence: 3 items
- Decisions to review: 1 item

Run `/fpf:decay` for detailed freshness management.
```

## File: .fpf/.baseline

Track the last actualization point:

```yaml
# FPF Actualization Baseline
last_actualized: 2025-01-15T16:00:00Z
commit: abc123def456789
branch: main
```

## When to Run

- **Before starting new work**: Ensure knowledge base is current
- **After major changes**: Sync evidence with code changes
- **Weekly maintenance**: Part of regular hygiene
- **Before decisions**: Ensure evidence is still valid

Excerpt, first 3,726 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit c64c9eb

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit
git -C context-engineering-kit checkout c64c9eb3b29e

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit c64c9eb3b29e only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source c64c9eb3b29e

README badge

For maintainers · shows the latest audit

ModelsAtlas: SAFE BMODELSATLASSAFE · B
[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/neolabhq/actualize/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/neolabhq/actualize/)

The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.

Similar skills

Add this badge to your README

[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/neolabhq/actualize/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/neolabhq/actualize/)

Questions about actualize

What does the actualize skill do?
Hand-crafted Claude Code Skills focused on improving agent results quality. Compatible with OpenCode, Cursor, Antigravity, Gemini CLI, and others. Includes CodeRabbit open-source alternative.
Is actualize safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can actualize access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (c64c9eb3b29e), read on 2026-10-20. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.