Tracking Threat Actor InfrastructureSAFE
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: tracking-threat-actor-infrastructure
description: Discovers and maps adversary-controlled infrastructure (C2 servers,
phishing domains, exploit-kit hosts, bulletproof hosting) by pivoting across passive
DNS, certificate transparency logs, Shodan/Censys scans, WHOIS records, and network
fingerprints (JARM/JA3S). Use when tracking threat actor infrastructure, expanding
a known IOC into related assets, or producing STIX-based threat intelligence during
a CTI investigation.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: threat-intelligence
tags:
- threat-intelligence
- cti
- ioc
- mitre-attack
- stix
- infrastructure-tracking
- shodan
- censys
- passive-dns
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- ID.RA-01
- ID.RA-05
- DE.CM-01
- DE.AE-02
mitre_attack:
- T1591
- T1592
- T1593
- T1589
- T1566
mitre_f3:
version: '1.1'
tactics:
- reconnaissance
- resource-development
techniques:
- id: T1593
name: Search Open Websites/Domains
tactic: reconnaissance
source: attack
- id: T1583.001
name: 'Acquire Infrastructure: Domains'
tactic: resource-development
source: attack
- id: T1583.008
name: 'Acquire Infrastructure: Malvertising'
tactic: resource-development
source: attack
- id: T1583.003
name: 'Acquire Infrastructure: Virtual Private Network or Server'
tactic: resource-development
source: attack
- id: F1020.002
name: 'Create Fake Materials: Fake Website'
tactic: resource-development
source: f3
- id: T1608.006
name: 'Stage Capabilities: SEO Poisoning'
tactic: resource-development
source: attack
---
# Tracking Threat Actor Infrastructure
## Overview
Threat actor infrastructure tracking involves monitoring and mapping adversary-controlled assets including command-and-control (C2) servers, phishing domains, exploit kit hosts, bulletproof hosting, and staging servers. This skill covers using passive DNS, certificate transparency logs, Shodan/Censys scanning, WHOIS analysis, and network fingerprinting to discover, track, and pivot across threat actor infrastructure over time.
## When to Use
- When managing security operations that require tracking threat actor infrastructure
- When improving security program maturity and operational processes
- When establishing standardized procedures for security team workflows
- When integrating threat intelligence or vulnerability data into operations
## Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+ with `shodan`, `censys`, `requests`, `stix2` libraries
- API keys: Shodan, Censys, VirusTotal, SecurityTrails, PassiveTotal
- Understanding of DNS, TLS/SSL certificates, IP allocation, ASN structure
- Familiarity with passive DNS and certificate transparency concepts
- Access to domain registration (WHOIS) lookup services
## Key Concepts
### Infrastructure Pivoting
Pivoting is the technique of using one known indicator to discover related infrastructure. Starting from a known C2 IP address, analysts can pivot via: passive DNS (find domains), reverse WHOIS (find related registrations), SSL certificates (find shared certs), SSH key fingerprints, HTTP response fingerprints, JARM/JA3S hashes, and WHOIS registrant data.
### Passive DNS
Passive DNS databases record DNS query/response data observed at recursive resolvers. This allows analysts to find historical domain-to-IP mappings, discover domains hosted on a known C2 IP, and identify fast-flux or domain generation algorithm (DGA) behavior.
### Certificate Transparency
Certificate Transparency (CT) logs publicly record all SSL/TLS certificates issued by CAs. Monitoring CT logs reveals new certificates registered for suspicious domains, helping identify phishing sites and C2 infrastructure before they become active.
### Network Fingerprinting
- **JARM**: Active TLS server fingerprint (hash of TLS handshake responses)
- **JA3S**: Passive TLS server fingerprint (hash of Server Hello)
- **HTTP Headers**: Server banners, custom headers, response patterns
- **Favicon Hash**: Hash of HTTP favicon for server identification
## Workflow
### Step 1: Shodan Infrastructure Discovery
```python
import shodan
api = shodan.Shodan("YOUR_SHODAN_API_KEY")
def discover_infrastructure(ip_address):
"""Discover services and metadata for a target IP."""
try:
host = api.host(ip_address)
return {
"ip": host["ip_str"],
"org": host.get("org", ""),
"asn": host.get("asn", ""),
"isp": host.get("isp", ""),
"country": host.get("country_name", ""),
"city": host.get("city", ""),
"os": host.get("os"),
"ports": host.get("ports", []),
"vulns": host.get("vulns", []),
"hostnames": host.get("hostnames", []),
"domains": host.get("domains", []),
"tags": host.get("tags", []),
"services": [
{
"port": svc.get("port"),
"transport": svc.get("transport"),
"product": svc.get("product", ""),
"version": svc.get("version", ""),
"ssl_cert": svc.get("ssl", {}).get("cert", {}).get("subject", {}),
"jarm": svc.get("ssl", {}).get("jarm", ""),
}
for svc in host.get("data", [])
],
}
except shodan.APIError as e:
print(f"[-] Shodan error: {e}")
return None
def search_c2_framework(framework_name):
"""Search Shodan for known C2 framework signatures."""
c2_queries = {
"cobalt-strike": 'product:"Cobalt Strike Beacon"',
"metasploit": 'product:"Metasploit"',
"covenant": 'http.html:"Covenant" http.title:"Covenant"',
"sliver": 'ssl.cert.subject.cn:"multiplayer" ssl.cert.issuer.cn:"operators"',
"havoc": 'http.html_hash:-1472705893',
}
query = c2_queries.get(framework_name.lower(), framework_name)
results = api.search(query, limit=100)
hoTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | WARN |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- declared (4 observation(s))
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
"cobalt-strike": 'product:"Cobalt Strike Beacon"',
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__tracking-threat-actor-infrastructure.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Tracking Threat Actor Infrastructure skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Tracking Threat Actor Infrastructure safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Tracking Threat Actor Infrastructure access on my machine?
The audit observed that it reaches the network. Each of those is consistent with what it says it does. Secrets in the source: none found.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.