Atlas / Skills / mukul975 / Testing Mobile Api Authentication

Testing Mobile Api AuthenticationBLOCK

skills/mukul975/testing-mobile-api-authentication

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Verdict
BLOCK
Grade
D
Trust score
69 /100
Version
1.0.0
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
33,870
01

Overview

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Read from source at commit 6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: testing-mobile-api-authentication
description: 'Tests authentication and authorization mechanisms in mobile application
  APIs to identify broken authentication, insecure token management, session fixation,
  privilege escalation, and IDOR vulnerabilities. Use when performing API security
  assessments against mobile app backends, testing JWT implementations, evaluating
  OAuth flows, or assessing session management. Activates for requests involving mobile
  API auth testing, token security assessment, OAuth mobile flow testing, or API authorization
  bypass.

  '
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: mobile-security
author: mahipal
tags:
- mobile-security
- android
- ios
- api-security
- authentication
- penetration-testing
version: 1.0.0
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- PR.AA-05
- ID.RA-01
- DE.CM-09
mitre_attack:
- T1059
- T1056
- T1036
- T1078
- T1068
---
# Testing Mobile API Authentication

## When to Use

Use this skill when:
- Assessing mobile app backend API authentication during penetration tests
- Testing JWT token implementation for common vulnerabilities (none algorithm, weak signing)
- Evaluating OAuth 2.0 / OIDC flows in mobile applications for redirect, PKCE, and scope issues
- Testing for broken object-level authorization (BOLA/IDOR) in API endpoints

**Do not use** this skill against production APIs without explicit authorization and rate-limiting awareness.

## Prerequisites

- Burp Suite or mitmproxy configured as mobile device proxy
- SSL pinning bypassed on target application (if implemented)
- Valid test account credentials for the target application
- Postman or curl for API request crafting
- jwt.io or PyJWT for JWT analysis and manipulation

## Workflow

### Step 1: Map Authentication Endpoints

Intercept mobile app traffic to identify authentication-related endpoints:

```
POST /api/v1/auth/login          - Initial authentication
POST /api/v1/auth/register       - Account registration
POST /api/v1/auth/refresh        - Token refresh
POST /api/v1/auth/logout         - Session termination
POST /api/v1/auth/forgot-password - Password reset
POST /api/v1/auth/verify-otp     - OTP verification
GET  /api/v1/auth/me             - Authenticated user profile
```

### Step 2: Analyze Token Format and Security

**JWT Analysis:**
```bash
# Decode JWT without verification
echo "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIs..." | cut -d. -f2 | base64 -d 2>/dev/null

# Check for common JWT vulnerabilities:
# 1. None algorithm attack
# Change header to: {"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"}
# Remove signature: header.payload.

# 2. Algorithm confusion (RS256 to HS256)
# If server uses RS256, try HS256 with public key as secret

# 3. Weak signing key
# Use hashcat or jwt-cracker to brute-force HMAC secret
hashcat -m 16500 jwt.txt wordlist.txt

# 4. Expiration bypass
# Modify "exp" claim to future timestamp
```

**Opaque Token Analysis:**
```
- Test token length and entropy
- Check if tokens are sequential/predictable
- Test token reuse after logout
- Verify token invalidation on password change
```

### Step 3: Test Authentication Bypass

```bash
# Test missing authentication
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile

# Test with empty/null token
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer "

curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer null"

# Test with expired token (should fail)
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer <expired_token>"

# Test token from different user
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/123/profile \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer <user_456_token>"
```

### Step 4: Test IDOR / Broken Object-Level Authorization

```bash
# Change user ID in request path
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/123/orders \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer <user_456_token>"

# Change object ID in request body
curl -X PUT https://api.target.com/api/v1/orders/789 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer <user_456_token>" \
  -d '{"status": "cancelled"}'

# Test horizontal privilege escalation
# Access admin endpoints with regular user token
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/admin/users \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer <regular_user_token>"
```

### Step 5: Test Session Management

```bash
# Test concurrent sessions
# Login from multiple devices simultaneously - should both remain valid?

# Test session invalidation after logout
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST https://api.target.com/api/v1/auth/login \
  -d '{"email":"[email protected]","password":"pass"}' | jq -r '.token')

# Logout
curl -X POST https://api.target.com/api/v1/auth/logout \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"

# Try using the same token (should fail)
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/me \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"

# Test session invalidation after password change
# Token obtained before password change should be invalidated
```

### Step 6: Test OAuth 2.0 / OIDC Mobile Flows

```bash
# Test for authorization code interception
# Check if PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) is enforced
# Test with missing code_verifier parameter

# Test redirect URI manipulation
# Try custom scheme hijacking: myapp://callback
# Test with modified redirect_uri parameter

# Test scope escalation
# Request higher privileges than granted
```

## Key Concepts

| Term | Definition |
|------|-----------|
| **BOLA/IDOR** | Broken Object Level Authorization - accessing resources by changing identifiers without server-side authorization checks |
| **JWT** | JSON Web Token - self-contained authentication token with header, payload, and signature components |
| **PKCE** | Proof Key for Code Exchange - OAuth 2.0 extension preventing authorization code interception in mobile apps |
| **Token Refresh** | Mechanism for obtaining new access tokens using long-lived refresh tokens without re-authentication |
| **Session Fixation** | Attack where adversary sets a known session ID before victim authenticates, then hija
03

Trust audit

BLOCKgrade D · trust 69/100 Do not install this without reading the findings. The audit found something that could harm you or your machine.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)FAIL
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
declared (1 observation(s))
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (2)

CRITICALPrompt injection · prompt.transfer_instruction · CWE-94, CWE-1427
SKILL.md:150
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST https://api.target.com/api/v1/auth/login \
Why it matters. an instruction to move sensitive data to an outside destination
Fix. remove; a skill never needs the user's secrets off the machine
CRITICALPrompt injection · prompt.transfer_instruction · CWE-94, CWE-1427
SKILL.md:151
-d '{"email":"[email protected]","password":"pass"}' | jq -r '.token')
Why it matters. an instruction to move sensitive data to an outside destination
Fix. remove; a skill never needs the user's secrets off the machine

Gates applied: critical_finding, no_behavioural_pass, undeclared_transfer.

Audited 2026-10-07 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__testing-mobile-api-authentication.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-076c59587be632BLOCKD69first audit
05

Questions

What does the Testing Mobile Api Authentication skill do?

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Is Testing Mobile Api Authentication safe to install?

No — not without reading the findings first. The audit graded it D (69/100) and found 2 critical or high issues in the source. Each one is listed on this page with the file and line it is on.

What can Testing Mobile Api Authentication access on my machine?

The audit observed that it reaches the network. Each of those is consistent with what it says it does. Secrets in the source: none found.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement