Building Incident Response DashboardSAFE
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: building-incident-response-dashboard
description: 'Builds real-time incident response dashboards in Splunk, Elastic, or
Grafana to provide SOC analysts and leadership with situational awareness during
active incidents, tracking affected systems, containment status, IOC spread, and
response timeline. Use when IR teams need unified visibility during incident coordination
and post-incident reporting.
'
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: soc-operations
tags:
- soc
- dashboard
- incident-response
- splunk
- visualization
- situational-awareness
- metrics
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- DE.CM-01
- DE.AE-02
- RS.MA-01
- DE.AE-06
mitre_attack:
- T1486
- T1071.001
- T1021.002
- T1041
- T1566
---
# Building Incident Response Dashboard
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- IR teams need real-time dashboards during active incidents for coordination and tracking
- SOC leadership requires operational dashboards showing incident status and analyst workload
- Post-incident reviews need visual timelines and impact assessments
- Executive briefings require high-level incident metrics and trend analysis
**Do not use** for day-to-day SOC monitoring dashboards (use Incident Review instead) — IR dashboards are designed for active incident coordination and management reporting.
## Prerequisites
- SIEM platform (Splunk with Dashboard Studio, Elastic Kibana, or Grafana)
- Notable event and incident data in SIEM (Splunk ES incident_review index)
- Ticketing system integration (ServiceNow, Jira) for remediation tracking
- Asset and identity lookup tables for context enrichment
- Dashboard publishing access for SOC team and management distribution
## Workflow
### Step 1: Design Active Incident Dashboard Layout
Build a Splunk Dashboard Studio dashboard for active incident tracking:
```xml
<dashboard version="2" theme="dark">
<label>Active Incident Response Dashboard</label>
<description>Real-time tracking for IR-2024-0450</description>
<row>
<panel>
<title>Incident Summary</title>
<single>
<search>
<query>
| makeresults
| eval incident_id="IR-2024-0450",
status="CONTAINMENT",
severity="Critical",
affected_hosts=7,
contained_hosts=5,
iocs_identified=23,
hours_elapsed=round((now()-strptime("2024-03-15 14:00","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M"))/3600,1)
| table incident_id, status, severity, affected_hosts, contained_hosts, iocs_identified, hours_elapsed
</query>
</search>
</single>
</panel>
</row>
</dashboard>
```
### Step 2: Build Real-Time Affected Systems Panel
Track affected systems and their containment status:
```spl
| inputlookup ir_affected_systems.csv
| eval status_color = case(
status="Contained", "#2ecc71",
status="Compromised", "#e74c3c",
status="Investigating", "#f39c12",
status="Recovered", "#3498db",
1=1, "#95a5a6"
)
| stats count by status
| eval order = case(status="Compromised", 1, status="Investigating", 2,
status="Contained", 3, status="Recovered", 4)
| sort order
| table status, count
--- Detailed host table
| inputlookup ir_affected_systems.csv
| lookup asset_lookup_by_cidr ip AS host_ip OUTPUT category, owner, priority
| table hostname, host_ip, category, owner, status, containment_time,
compromise_vector, analyst_assigned
| sort status, hostname
```
### Step 3: Build IOC Tracking Panel
Monitor IOC spread across the environment:
```spl
--- IOCs identified during incident
index=* (src_ip IN ("185.234.218.50", "45.77.123.45") OR
dest IN ("evil-c2.com", "malware-drop.com") OR
file_hash IN ("a1b2c3d4...", "e5f6a7b8..."))
earliest="2024-03-14"
| stats count AS hits, dc(src_ip) AS unique_sources,
dc(dest) AS unique_dests, latest(_time) AS last_seen
by sourcetype
| sort - hits
--- IOC timeline
index=* (src_ip IN ("185.234.218.50") OR dest="evil-c2.com")
earliest="2024-03-14"
| timechart span=1h count by sourcetype
--- New IOC discovery tracking
| inputlookup ir_ioc_list.csv
| stats count by ioc_type, source, discovery_time
| sort discovery_time
| table discovery_time, ioc_type, ioc_value, source, status
```
### Step 4: Build Response Timeline Panel
Create chronological incident timeline:
```spl
| inputlookup ir_timeline.csv
| sort _time
| eval phase = case(
action_type="detection", "Detection",
action_type="triage", "Triage",
action_type="containment", "Containment",
action_type="eradication", "Eradication",
action_type="recovery", "Recovery",
1=1, "Other"
)
| eval phase_color = case(
phase="Detection", "#e74c3c",
phase="Triage", "#f39c12",
phase="Containment", "#e67e22",
phase="Eradication", "#2ecc71",
phase="Recovery", "#3498db"
)
| table _time, phase, action, analyst, details
```
Example timeline data:
```csv
_time,action_type,action,analyst,details
2024-03-15 14:00,detection,Alert triggered - Cobalt Strike beacon detected,splunk_es,Notable event NE-2024-08921
2024-03-15 14:12,triage,Alert triaged - confirmed true positive,analyst_jdoe,VT score 52/72 on beacon hash
2024-03-15 14:23,containment,Host WORKSTATION-042 isolated,analyst_jdoe,CrowdStrike network isolation
2024-03-15 14:35,containment,C2 domain blocked on firewall,analyst_msmith,Palo Alto rule deployed
2024-03-15 15:00,eradication,Enterprise-wide IOC scan initiated,analyst_jdoe,Splunk search across all indices
2024-03-15 15:30,containment,3 additional hosts identified and isolated,analyst_msmith,Lateral movement confirmed
2024-03-15 16:00,eradication,Malware removed from all affected hosts,analyst_tier3,CrowdStrike RTR cleanup
2024-03-15 18:00,recovery,Systems restored and monitored,analyst_msmith,72-hour monitoring period started
```
### Step 5: Build SOC Operations Dashboard
Track overall SOC performance metrics:
```spl
--- Incident volume by severity (last 30 days)
index=notable earliest=-30d
| stats count by urgency
| eval order = case(urgency="cTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__building-incident-response-dashboard.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Building Incident Response Dashboard skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Building Incident Response Dashboard safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Building Incident Response Dashboard access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.