Building Detection Rules With SigmaCAUTION
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07Install
Commands as the repository documents them. They are shown, not run.
pip install pySigma pySigma-validators-sigmaHQ
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: building-detection-rules-with-sigma
description: 'Builds vendor-agnostic detection rules using the Sigma rule format for
threat detection across SIEM platforms including Splunk, Elastic, and Microsoft
Sentinel. Use when creating portable detection logic from threat intelligence, mapping
rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques, or converting community Sigma rules into platform-specific
queries using sigmac or pySigma backends.
'
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: soc-operations
tags:
- soc
- sigma
- detection-rules
- siem
- mitre-attack
- splunk
- elastic
- sentinel
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
d3fend_techniques:
- Execution Isolation
- Process Termination
- Hardware-based Process Isolation
- Web Session Access Mediation
- Process Suspension
nist_csf:
- DE.CM-01
- DE.AE-02
- RS.MA-01
- DE.AE-06
mitre_attack:
- T1059.001
- T1003.001
- T1055
- T1053.005
- T1547.001
---
# Building Detection Rules with Sigma
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- SOC engineers need to create detection rules portable across multiple SIEM platforms
- Threat intelligence reports describe TTPs requiring new detection coverage
- Existing vendor-specific rules need standardization into a shareable format
- The team adopts Sigma as a detection-as-code standard in CI/CD pipelines
**Do not use** for real-time streaming detection (Sigma is for batch/scheduled searches) or when the target SIEM has native detection features that Sigma cannot express (e.g., Splunk RBA risk scoring).
## Prerequisites
- Python 3.8+ with `pySigma` and appropriate backend (`pySigma-backend-splunk`, `pySigma-backend-elasticsearch`, `pySigma-backend-microsoft365defender`)
- Sigma rule repository cloned: `git clone https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma.git`
- MITRE ATT&CK framework knowledge for technique mapping
- Understanding of target SIEM log source field mappings
## Workflow
### Step 1: Define Detection Logic from Threat Intelligence
Start with a threat report or ATT&CK technique. Example: detecting Mimikatz credential dumping (T1003.001 — LSASS Memory):
```yaml
title: Mimikatz Credential Dumping via LSASS Access
id: 0d894093-71bc-43c3-8d63-bf520e73a7c5
status: stable
level: high
description: Detects process accessing lsass.exe memory, indicative of credential dumping tools like Mimikatz
references:
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1003/001/
- https://github.com/gentilkiwi/mimikatz
author: mahipal
date: 2024/03/15
modified: 2024/03/15
tags:
- attack.credential_access
- attack.t1003.001
logsource:
category: process_access
product: windows
detection:
selection:
TargetImage|endswith: '\lsass.exe'
GrantedAccess|contains:
- '0x1010'
- '0x1038'
- '0x1fffff'
- '0x40'
filter_main_svchost:
SourceImage|endswith: '\svchost.exe'
filter_main_csrss:
SourceImage|endswith: '\csrss.exe'
filter_main_wininit:
SourceImage|endswith: '\wininit.exe'
condition: selection and not 1 of filter_main_*
falsepositives:
- Legitimate security tools accessing LSASS
- Windows Defender scanning
- CrowdStrike Falcon sensor
```
### Step 2: Validate Sigma Rule Syntax
Use `sigma check` to validate the rule:
```bash
# Install pySigma and validators
pip install pySigma pySigma-validators-sigmaHQ
# Validate rule
sigma check rule.yml
```
Alternatively, validate with Python:
```python
from sigma.rule import SigmaRule
from sigma.validators.core import SigmaValidator
rule = SigmaRule.from_yaml(open("rule.yml").read())
validator = SigmaValidator()
issues = validator.validate_rule(rule)
for issue in issues:
print(f"{issue.severity}: {issue.message}")
```
### Step 3: Convert to Target SIEM Query
**Convert to Splunk SPL:**
```python
from sigma.rule import SigmaRule
from sigma.backends.splunk import SplunkBackend
from sigma.pipelines.splunk import splunk_windows_pipeline
pipeline = splunk_windows_pipeline()
backend = SplunkBackend(pipeline)
rule = SigmaRule.from_yaml(open("rule.yml").read())
splunk_query = backend.convert_rule(rule)
print(splunk_query[0])
```
Output:
```spl
TargetImage="*\\lsass.exe" (GrantedAccess="*0x1010*" OR GrantedAccess="*0x1038*"
OR GrantedAccess="*0x1fffff*" OR GrantedAccess="*0x40*")
NOT (SourceImage="*\\svchost.exe") NOT (SourceImage="*\\csrss.exe")
NOT (SourceImage="*\\wininit.exe")
```
**Convert to Elastic Query (Lucene):**
```python
from sigma.backends.elasticsearch import LuceneBackend
from sigma.pipelines.elasticsearch import ecs_windows_pipeline
pipeline = ecs_windows_pipeline()
backend = LuceneBackend(pipeline)
elastic_query = backend.convert_rule(rule)
print(elastic_query[0])
```
**Convert to Microsoft Sentinel KQL:**
```python
from sigma.backends.microsoft365defender import Microsoft365DefenderBackend
backend = Microsoft365DefenderBackend()
kql_query = backend.convert_rule(rule)
print(kql_query[0])
```
### Step 4: Map to MITRE ATT&CK and Add Coverage Metadata
Tag every rule with ATT&CK technique IDs in the `tags` field:
```yaml
tags:
- attack.credential_access # Tactic
- attack.t1003.001 # Sub-technique
- attack.t1003 # Parent technique
```
Track detection coverage using the ATT&CK Navigator:
```python
import json
# Generate ATT&CK Navigator layer from Sigma rules
layer = {
"name": "SOC Detection Coverage",
"versions": {"attack": "14", "navigator": "4.9", "layer": "4.5"},
"domain": "enterprise-attack",
"techniques": []
}
# Parse Sigma rules directory for technique tags
import os
from sigma.rule import SigmaRule
for root, dirs, files in os.walk("sigma/rules/windows/"):
for f in files:
if f.endswith(".yml"):
rule = SigmaRule.from_yaml(open(os.path.join(root, f)).read())
for tag in rule.tags:
if str(tag).startswith("attack.t"):
technique_id = str(tag).replace("attack.", "").upper()
layTrust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | FAIL |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
name = "LSASS Memory Access - Credential Dumping"
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__building-detection-rules-with-sigma.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Building Detection Rules With Sigma skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Building Detection Rules With Sigma safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 1 thing worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Building Detection Rules With Sigma access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.