Atlas / Skills / mukul975 / Building Adversary Infrastructure Tracking System

Building Adversary Infrastructure Tracking SystemSAFE

skills/mukul975/building-adversary-infrastructure-tracking-system

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.0
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
33,870
01

Overview

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Read from source at commit 6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: building-adversary-infrastructure-tracking-system
description: Build an automated adversary infrastructure tracking system in Python (dnspython, python-whois, shodan, networkx) that pivots across passive DNS, certificate transparency logs, WHOIS records, and IP enrichment to map threat-actor C2 networks and flag newly registered domains matching known patterns. Use when pivoting from known indicators to discover related C2 infrastructure or maintaining a continuously updated map of a threat actor's network.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: threat-intelligence
tags:
- infrastructure-tracking
- passive-dns
- c2
- whois
- threat-actor
- pivoting
- threat-intelligence
- domain-analysis
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- ID.RA-01
- ID.RA-05
- DE.CM-01
- DE.AE-02
mitre_attack:
- T1583.001
- T1583.004
- T1596.001
- T1590.002
- T1071.001
---
# Building Adversary Infrastructure Tracking System

## Overview

Adversary infrastructure tracking uses passive DNS records, certificate transparency logs, WHOIS registration data, and IP enrichment to discover, map, and monitor threat actor command-and-control (C2) networks. Attackers frequently reuse hosting providers, registrars, SSL certificates, and naming patterns across campaigns, enabling analysts to pivot from known indicators to discover new infrastructure. This skill covers building an automated tracking system that identifies infrastructure relationships, detects newly registered domains matching adversary patterns, and maintains a continuously updated map of threat actor networks.


## When to Use

- When deploying or configuring building adversary infrastructure tracking system capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation

## Prerequisites

- Python 3.9+ with `requests`, `dnspython`, `python-whois`, `shodan`, `networkx` libraries
- API keys: SecurityTrails, PassiveTotal/RiskIQ, Shodan, VirusTotal
- Access to passive DNS data sources
- Understanding of DNS infrastructure, hosting, and domain registration
- Graph database (Neo4j) or NetworkX for relationship visualization

## Key Concepts

### Passive DNS

Passive DNS captures historical DNS resolution data, recording which domains resolved to which IPs and when. Unlike active DNS queries, passive DNS preserves historical relationships even after records change, enabling analysts to track infrastructure changes, identify shared hosting patterns, and discover related domains that resolved to the same IP addresses over time.

### Infrastructure Pivoting

Pivoting identifies related infrastructure by following connections: IP pivot (find all domains on an IP), domain pivot (find all IPs a domain resolved to), WHOIS pivot (find domains with same registrant), certificate pivot (find hosts sharing SSL certificates), and NS/MX pivot (find domains using same name servers or mail servers).

### Adversary Infrastructure Patterns

Threat actors exhibit patterns: preferred registrars (Namecheap, REG.RU, Tucows), preferred hosting (bulletproof hosting providers, cloud services), domain generation algorithms (DGA), consistent naming patterns, and certificate reuse across campaigns.

## Workflow

### Step 1: Passive DNS Infrastructure Discovery

```python
import requests
import json
from collections import defaultdict
from datetime import datetime

class InfrastructureTracker:
    def __init__(self, securitytrails_key=None, vt_key=None, shodan_key=None):
        self.st_key = securitytrails_key
        self.vt_key = vt_key
        self.shodan_key = shodan_key
        self.infrastructure_graph = defaultdict(lambda: {"nodes": set(), "edges": []})

    def passive_dns_lookup(self, domain):
        """Query passive DNS for domain resolution history."""
        headers = {"apikey": self.st_key}
        url = f"https://api.securitytrails.com/v1/history/{domain}/dns/a"
        resp = requests.get(url, headers=headers, timeout=30)
        if resp.status_code == 200:
            records = resp.json().get("records", [])
            history = []
            for record in records:
                for value in record.get("values", []):
                    history.append({
                        "domain": domain,
                        "ip": value.get("ip", ""),
                        "first_seen": record.get("first_seen", ""),
                        "last_seen": record.get("last_seen", ""),
                        "type": record.get("type", "a"),
                    })
            print(f"[+] Passive DNS for {domain}: {len(history)} records")
            return history
        return []

    def reverse_ip_lookup(self, ip_address):
        """Find all domains hosted on an IP address."""
        headers = {"apikey": self.st_key}
        url = f"https://api.securitytrails.com/v1/ips/nearby/{ip_address}"
        resp = requests.get(url, headers=headers, timeout=30)
        if resp.status_code == 200:
            blocks = resp.json().get("blocks", [])
            domains = []
            for block in blocks:
                for site in block.get("sites", []):
                    domains.append(site)
            print(f"[+] Reverse IP for {ip_address}: {len(domains)} domains")
            return domains
        return []

    def whois_lookup(self, domain):
        """Get WHOIS registration data for pivoting."""
        headers = {"apikey": self.st_key}
        url = f"https://api.securitytrails.com/v1/domain/{domain}/whois"
        resp = requests.get(url, headers=headers, timeout=30)
        if resp.status_code == 200:
            data = resp.json()
            whois_data = {
                "domain": domain,
                "registrar": data.get("registrar", ""),
                "registrant_org": data.get("registrant_org", ""),
                "registrant_email": data.get("registrant_ema
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
declared (3 observation(s))
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-07 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__building-adversary-infrastructure-tracking-system.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-076c59587be632SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Building Adversary Infrastructure Tracking System skill do?

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Is Building Adversary Infrastructure Tracking System safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Building Adversary Infrastructure Tracking System access on my machine?

The audit observed that it reaches the network. Each of those is consistent with what it says it does. Secrets in the source: none found.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement