Automating Ioc EnrichmentSAFE
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: automating-ioc-enrichment
description: 'Automates the enrichment of raw indicators of compromise with multi-source
threat intelligence context using SOAR platforms, Python pipelines, or TIP playbooks
to reduce analyst triage time and standardize enrichment outputs. Use when building
automated enrichment workflows integrated with SIEM alerts, email submission pipelines,
or bulk IOC processing from threat feeds. Activates for requests involving SOAR
enrichment, Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, TheHive, Python enrichment pipelines, or
automated IOC processing.
'
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: threat-intelligence
tags:
- SOAR
- enrichment
- IOC
- Cortex-XSOAR
- Splunk-SOAR
- VirusTotal
- automation
- CTI
- NIST-CSF
version: 1.0.0
author: team-cybersecurity
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- ID.RA-01
- ID.RA-05
- DE.CM-01
- DE.AE-02
mitre_attack:
- T1071.001
- T1583.001
- T1588.001
- T1590.005
- T1596
---
# Automating IOC Enrichment
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Building a SOAR playbook that automatically enriches SIEM alerts with threat intelligence context before routing to analysts
- Creating a Python pipeline for bulk IOC enrichment from phishing email submissions
- Reducing analyst mean time to triage (MTTT) by pre-populating alert context with VT, Shodan, and MISP data
**Do not use** this skill for fully automated blocking decisions without human review — enrichment automation should inform decisions, not execute blocks autonomously for high-impact actions.
## Prerequisites
- SOAR platform (Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Tines, or n8n) or Python 3.9+ environment
- API keys: VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, Shodan, and at minimum one TIP (MISP or OpenCTI)
- SIEM integration endpoint for alert consumption
- Rate limit budgets documented per API (VT: 4/min free, 500/min enterprise)
## Workflow
### Step 1: Design Enrichment Pipeline Architecture
Define the enrichment flow for each IOC type:
```
SIEM Alert → Extract IOCs → Classify Type → Route to enrichment functions
IP Address → AbuseIPDB + Shodan + VirusTotal IP + MISP
Domain → VirusTotal Domain + PassiveTotal + Shodan + MISP
URL → URLScan.io + VirusTotal URL + Google Safe Browse
File Hash → VirusTotal Files + MalwareBazaar + MISP
→ Aggregate results → Calculate confidence score → Update alert → Notify analyst
```
### Step 2: Implement Python Enrichment Functions
```python
import requests
import time
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Optional
RATE_LIMIT_DELAY = 0.25 # 4 requests/second for VT free tier
@dataclass
class EnrichmentResult:
ioc_value: str
ioc_type: str
vt_malicious: int = 0
vt_total: int = 0
abuse_confidence: int = 0
shodan_ports: list = field(default_factory=list)
misp_events: list = field(default_factory=list)
confidence_score: int = 0
def enrich_ip(ip: str, vt_key: str, abuse_key: str, shodan_key: str) -> EnrichmentResult:
result = EnrichmentResult(ip, "ip")
# VirusTotal IP lookup
vt_resp = requests.get(
f"https://www.virustotal.com/api/v3/ip_addresses/{ip}",
headers={"x-apikey": vt_key}
)
if vt_resp.status_code == 200:
stats = vt_resp.json()["data"]["attributes"]["last_analysis_stats"]
result.vt_malicious = stats.get("malicious", 0)
result.vt_total = sum(stats.values())
time.sleep(RATE_LIMIT_DELAY)
# AbuseIPDB
abuse_resp = requests.get(
"https://api.abuseipdb.com/api/v2/check",
headers={"Key": abuse_key, "Accept": "application/json"},
params={"ipAddress": ip, "maxAgeInDays": 90}
)
if abuse_resp.status_code == 200:
result.abuse_confidence = abuse_resp.json()["data"]["abuseConfidenceScore"]
# Calculate composite confidence score
result.confidence_score = min(
(result.vt_malicious / max(result.vt_total, 1)) * 60 +
(result.abuse_confidence / 100) * 40, 100
)
return result
def enrich_hash(sha256: str, vt_key: str) -> EnrichmentResult:
result = EnrichmentResult(sha256, "sha256")
vt_resp = requests.get(
f"https://www.virustotal.com/api/v3/files/{sha256}",
headers={"x-apikey": vt_key}
)
if vt_resp.status_code == 200:
stats = vt_resp.json()["data"]["attributes"]["last_analysis_stats"]
result.vt_malicious = stats.get("malicious", 0)
result.vt_total = sum(stats.values())
result.confidence_score = int((result.vt_malicious / max(result.vt_total, 1)) * 100)
return result
```
### Step 3: Build SOAR Playbook (Cortex XSOAR)
In Cortex XSOAR, create an enrichment playbook:
1. **Trigger**: Alert created in SIEM (via webhook or polling)
2. **Extract IOCs**: Use "Extract Indicators" task with regex patterns for IP, domain, URL, hash
3. **Parallel enrichment**: Fan-out to multiple enrichment tasks simultaneously
4. **VT Enrichment**: Call `!vt-file-scan` or `!vt-ip-scan` commands
5. **AbuseIPDB check**: Call `!abuseipdb-check-ip` command
6. **MISP Lookup**: Call `!misp-search` for cross-referencing
7. **Score aggregation**: Python transform task computing composite score
8. **Conditional routing**: If score ≥70 → High Priority queue; if 40–69 → Medium; <40 → Auto-close with note
9. **Alert enrichment**: Write enrichment results to alert context for analyst view
### Step 4: Handle Rate Limiting and Failures
```python
import time
from functools import wraps
def rate_limited(max_per_second):
min_interval = 1.0 / max_per_second
def decorator(func):
last_called = [0.0]
@wraps(func)
def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
elapsed = time.time() - last_called[0]
wait = min_interval - elapsed
if wait > 0:
time.sleep(wait)
result = func(*args, **kwargs)
last_called[0] = time.time()
return result
return wrapper
return decorator
def retry_on_429(max_retries=3):
def decorator(func):
@wraps(func)
def wrapper(Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- declared (4 observation(s))
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__automating-ioc-enrichment.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Automating Ioc Enrichment skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Automating Ioc Enrichment safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Automating Ioc Enrichment access on my machine?
The audit observed that it reaches the network. Each of those is consistent with what it says it does. Secrets in the source: none found.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.