Analyzing Tls Certificate Transparency LogsSAFE
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: analyzing-tls-certificate-transparency-logs
description: 'Queries Certificate Transparency logs via crt.sh and pycrtsh to detect
phishing domains, unauthorized certificate issuance, and shadow IT. Monitors newly
issued certificates for typosquatting and brand impersonation using Levenshtein
distance. Use for proactive phishing domain detection and certificate monitoring.
'
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: security-operations
tags:
- certificate-transparency
- ct-logs
- crt-sh
- phishing-detection
- tls-monitoring
- security-operations
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
atlas_techniques:
- AML.T0073
- AML.T0052
nist_csf:
- DE.CM-01
- RS.MA-01
- GV.OV-01
- DE.AE-02
mitre_attack:
- T1583.001
- T1566.002
- T1598.003
- T1583.006
mitre_f3:
version: '1.1'
tactics:
- reconnaissance
- resource-development
- initial-access
techniques:
- id: T1598
name: Phishing for Information
tactic: reconnaissance
source: attack
- id: T1593
name: Search Open Websites/Domains
tactic: reconnaissance
source: attack
- id: T1583.001
name: 'Acquire Infrastructure: Domains'
tactic: resource-development
source: attack
- id: F1020.002
name: 'Create Fake Materials: Fake Website'
tactic: resource-development
source: f3
- id: T1660
name: Phishing
tactic: initial-access
source: attack
---
# Analyzing TLS Certificate Transparency Logs
## When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing tls certificate transparency logs
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
## Prerequisites
- Familiarity with security operations concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
## Instructions
Query crt.sh Certificate Transparency database to find certificates issued for
domains similar to your organization's brand, detecting phishing infrastructure.
```python
from pycrtsh import Crtsh
c = Crtsh()
# Search for certificates matching a domain
certs = c.search("example.com")
for cert in certs:
print(cert["id"], cert["name_value"])
# Get full certificate details
details = c.get(certs[0]["id"], type="id")
```
Key analysis steps:
1. Query crt.sh for all certificates matching your domain pattern
2. Identify certificates with typosquatting variations (Levenshtein distance)
3. Flag certificates from unexpected CAs
4. Monitor for wildcard certificates on suspicious subdomains
5. Cross-reference with known phishing infrastructure
## Examples
```python
from pycrtsh import Crtsh
c = Crtsh()
certs = c.search("%.example.com")
for cert in certs:
print(f"Issuer: {cert.get('issuer_name')}, Domain: {cert.get('name_value')}")
```Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- declared (1 observation(s))
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__analyzing-tls-certificate-transparency-logs.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Analyzing Tls Certificate Transparency Logs skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Analyzing Tls Certificate Transparency Logs safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Analyzing Tls Certificate Transparency Logs access on my machine?
The audit observed that it reaches the network. Each of those is consistent with what it says it does. Secrets in the source: none found.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.