Atlas / Skills / mukul975 / Analyzing Threat Landscape With Misp

Analyzing Threat Landscape With MispSAFE

skills/mukul975/analyzing-threat-landscape-with-misp

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.0
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
33,876
01

Overview

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Read from source at commit 6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: analyzing-threat-landscape-with-misp
description: Query a MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) instance via PyMISP
  to compute event statistics, IOC type breakdowns, threat actor galaxy clusters,
  and tag trends, and generate threat landscape reports with temporal trends. Use
  when asked to analyze threat intelligence data, summarize top threat actors or
  malware families, or produce a CTI landscape report from MISP events.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: threat-intelligence
tags:
- threat-intelligence
- misp
- threat-landscape
- ioc-analysis
- cti
- threat-sharing
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
d3fend_techniques:
- File Metadata Consistency Validation
- Application Protocol Command Analysis
- Identifier Analysis
- Content Format Conversion
- Message Analysis
nist_csf:
- ID.RA-01
- ID.RA-05
- DE.CM-01
- DE.AE-02
mitre_attack:
- T1566
- T1071.001
- T1568
- T1583.001
- T1102
---


# Analyzing Threat Landscape with MISP


## When to Use

- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing threat landscape with misp
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques

## Prerequisites

- Familiarity with threat intelligence concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities

## Instructions

1. Install dependencies: `pip install pymisp`
2. Configure MISP URL and API key.
3. Run the agent to generate threat landscape analysis:
   - Pull event statistics by threat level and date range
   - Analyze attribute type distributions (IP, domain, hash, URL)
   - Identify top MITRE ATT&CK techniques from event tags
   - Track threat actor activity via galaxy clusters
   - Generate temporal trend analysis of IOC submissions

```bash
python scripts/agent.py --misp-url https://misp.local --api-key YOUR_KEY --days 90 --output landscape_report.json
```

## Examples

### Threat Landscape Summary
```
Period: Last 90 days
Events analyzed: 1,247
Top threat level: High (43%)
Top attribute type: ip-dst (31%), domain (22%), sha256 (18%)
Top MITRE technique: T1566 Phishing (89 events)
Top threat actor: APT28 (34 events)
```
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-07 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__analyzing-threat-landscape-with-misp.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-076c59587be632SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Analyzing Threat Landscape With Misp skill do?

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Is Analyzing Threat Landscape With Misp safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Analyzing Threat Landscape With Misp access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement