Analyzing Malware Sandbox Evasion TechniquesSAFE
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: analyzing-malware-sandbox-evasion-techniques description: Detect sandbox and VM evasion techniques in malware samples by analyzing timing checks, VM/hypervisor artifact queries, user-interaction checks, and sleep-inflation patterns from Cuckoo or AnyRun behavioral reports. Use when a sample shows no or minimal activity in a sandbox, when a behavioral report needs review for evasion indicators, or when building detections for anti-analysis techniques. domain: cybersecurity subdomain: malware-analysis tags: - sandbox-evasion - malware-analysis - cuckoo - anyrun - mitre-attack - virtualization-detection - behavioral-analysis version: '1.0' author: mahipal license: Apache-2.0 d3fend_techniques: - Platform Hardening - Restore Object - Process Analysis - System Call Filtering - Restore Software nist_csf: - DE.AE-02 - RS.AN-03 - ID.RA-01 - DE.CM-01 mitre_attack: - T1497.001 - T1497.003 - T1480 - T1027.002 --- # Analyzing Malware Sandbox Evasion Techniques ## Overview Sandbox evasion (MITRE ATT&CK T1497) allows malware to detect analysis environments and alter behavior to avoid detection. This skill analyzes behavioral reports from Cuckoo Sandbox and AnyRun for evasion indicators including timing-based checks (GetTickCount, QueryPerformanceCounter, sleep inflation), VM artifact detection (registry keys, MAC address prefixes, process names like vmtoolsd.exe), user interaction checks (mouse movement, keyboard input), and environment fingerprinting (disk size, CPU count, RAM). Detection rules flag samples exhibiting these behaviors for deeper manual analysis. ## When to Use - When investigating security incidents that require analyzing malware sandbox evasion techniques - When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain - When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type - When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques ## Prerequisites - Cuckoo Sandbox 2.0+ or AnyRun account for behavioral analysis reports - Python 3.8+ with json library for report parsing - Behavioral report exports in JSON format ## Steps 1. Parse Cuckoo/AnyRun behavioral report JSON files 2. Extract API call sequences for timing-related functions 3. Identify VM artifact detection via registry queries and WMI calls 4. Detect sleep inflation by comparing requested vs actual sleep durations 5. Flag user interaction checks (GetCursorPos, GetAsyncKeyState patterns) 6. Score evasion sophistication based on technique count and diversity 7. Map detected techniques to MITRE ATT&CK T1497 sub-techniques ## Expected Output JSON report listing detected evasion techniques with MITRE ATT&CK mapping, API call evidence, evasion sophistication score, and classification of evasion categories (timing, VM detection, user interaction, environment fingerprinting).
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__analyzing-malware-sandbox-evasion-techniques.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Analyzing Malware Sandbox Evasion Techniques skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Analyzing Malware Sandbox Evasion Techniques safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Analyzing Malware Sandbox Evasion Techniques access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.