Analyzing Malware Persistence With AutorunsSAFE
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: analyzing-malware-persistence-with-autoruns
description: Use Sysinternals Autoruns to systematically enumerate and analyze malware
persistence mechanisms across Windows registry run keys, scheduled tasks, services,
drivers, and startup locations. Use when hunting for persistence during Windows
incident response, triaging a compromised endpoint, or validating that malware
autostart entries have been fully identified and removed.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: malware-analysis
tags:
- autoruns
- persistence
- malware-analysis
- sysinternals
- windows
- registry
- startup
- incident-response
mitre_attack:
- T1547.001
- T1543.003
- T1053.005
- T1574.001
- T1037.001
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
d3fend_techniques:
- Executable Denylisting
- Execution Isolation
- File Metadata Consistency Validation
- Content Format Conversion
- File Content Analysis
nist_csf:
- DE.AE-02
- RS.AN-03
- ID.RA-01
- DE.CM-01
---
# Analyzing Malware Persistence with Autoruns
## Overview
Sysinternals Autoruns extracts data from hundreds of Auto-Start Extensibility Points (ASEPs) on Windows, scanning 18+ categories including Run/RunOnce keys, services, scheduled tasks, drivers, Winlogon entries, LSA providers, print monitors, WMI subscriptions, and AppInit DLLs. Digital signature verification filters Microsoft-signed entries. The compare function identifies newly added persistence via baseline diffing. VirusTotal integration checks hash reputation. Offline analysis via -z flag enables forensic disk image examination.
## When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing malware persistence with autoruns
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
## Prerequisites
- Sysinternals Autoruns (GUI) and Autorunsc (CLI)
- Administrative privileges on target system
- Python 3.9+ for automated analysis
- VirusTotal API key for reputation checks
- Clean baseline export for comparison
## Workflow
### Step 1: Automated Persistence Scanning
```python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Automate Autoruns-based persistence analysis."""
import subprocess
import csv
import json
import sys
def scan_and_analyze(autorunsc_path="autorunsc64.exe", csv_path="scan.csv"):
cmd = [autorunsc_path, "-a", "*", "-c", "-h", "-s", "-nobanner", "*"]
result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=600)
with open(csv_path, 'w') as f:
f.write(result.stdout)
return parse_and_flag(csv_path)
def parse_and_flag(csv_path):
suspicious = []
with open(csv_path, 'r', errors='replace') as f:
for row in csv.DictReader(f):
reasons = []
signer = row.get("Signer", "")
if not signer or signer == "(Not verified)":
reasons.append("Unsigned binary")
if not row.get("Description") and not row.get("Company"):
reasons.append("Missing metadata")
path = row.get("Image Path", "").lower()
for sp in ["\temp\\", "\appdata\local\temp", "\users\public\\"]:
if sp in path:
reasons.append(f"Suspicious path")
launch = row.get("Launch String", "").lower()
for kw in ["powershell", "cmd /c", "wscript", "mshta", "regsvr32"]:
if kw in launch:
reasons.append(f"LOLBin: {kw}")
if reasons:
row["reasons"] = reasons
suspicious.append(row)
return suspicious
if __name__ == "__main__":
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
results = parse_and_flag(sys.argv[1])
print(f"[!] {len(results)} suspicious entries")
for r in results:
print(f" {r.get('Entry','')} - {r.get('Image Path','')}")
for reason in r.get('reasons', []):
print(f" - {reason}")
```
## Validation Criteria
- All ASEP categories scanned and cataloged
- Unsigned entries flagged for investigation
- Suspicious paths and LOLBin launch strings highlighted
- Baseline comparison identifies new persistence mechanisms
## References
- [Sysinternals Autoruns](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/autoruns)
- [SANS - Offline Autoruns Revisited](https://www.sans.org/blog/offline-autoruns-revisited-auditing-malware-persistence/)
- [Hunting Malware with Autoruns](https://nasbench.medium.com/hunting-malware-with-windows-sysinternals-autoruns-19cbfe4103c2)
- [MITRE ATT&CK T1547 - Boot or Logon Autostart](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1547/)Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__analyzing-malware-persistence-with-autoruns.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Analyzing Malware Persistence With Autoruns skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Analyzing Malware Persistence With Autoruns safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Analyzing Malware Persistence With Autoruns access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.