Analyzing Malicious Pdf With PeepdfSAFE
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07Install
Commands as the repository documents them. They are shown, not run.
pip install peepdf-3
git clone https://github.com/jesparza/peepdf.git
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: analyzing-malicious-pdf-with-peepdf description: Perform static analysis of malicious PDF documents using peepdf, pdfid, and pdf-parser to extract embedded JavaScript, shellcode, and suspicious objects. Use when triaging a suspicious PDF attachment from a phishing email, analyzing a PDF-based exploit document, or building detection signatures for weaponized PDF threats. domain: cybersecurity subdomain: malware-analysis tags: - malware-analysis - pdf - peepdf - pdfid - pdf-parser - static-analysis - reverse-engineering - dfir version: '1.0' author: mahipal license: Apache-2.0 nist_csf: - DE.AE-02 - RS.AN-03 - ID.RA-01 - DE.CM-01 mitre_attack: - T1204.002 - T1059.007 - T1027 - T1106 --- # Analyzing Malicious PDF with peepdf ## When to Use - When triaging suspicious PDF attachments from phishing emails - During malware analysis of PDF-based exploit documents - When extracting embedded JavaScript, shellcode, or executables from PDFs - For forensic examination of weaponized document artifacts - When building detection signatures for PDF-based threats ## Prerequisites - Python 3.8+ with peepdf-3 installed (pip install peepdf-3) - pdfid.py and pdf-parser.py from Didier Stevens suite - Isolated analysis environment (VM or sandbox) - Optional: PyV8 for JavaScript emulation within peepdf - Optional: Pylibemu for shellcode analysis ## Workflow 1. **Triage with pdfid**: Scan PDF for suspicious keywords (/JS, /JavaScript, /OpenAction, /Launch, /EmbeddedFile). 2. **Interactive Analysis**: Open PDF in peepdf interactive mode to explore object structure. 3. **Identify Suspicious Objects**: Locate objects containing JavaScript, streams, or encoded data. 4. **Extract Content**: Dump suspicious streams and decode filters (FlateDecode, ASCIIHexDecode). 5. **Deobfuscate JavaScript**: Analyze extracted JS for shellcode, heap sprays, or exploit code. 6. **Check VirusTotal**: Use peepdf vtcheck to cross-reference file hash with AV detections. 7. **Generate IOCs**: Extract URLs, domains, hashes, and shellcode signatures. ## Key Concepts | Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | /OpenAction | Automatic action executed when PDF is opened | | /JavaScript /JS | Embedded JavaScript code in PDF objects | | /Launch | Action that launches external applications | | /EmbeddedFile | File embedded within the PDF structure | | FlateDecode | zlib compression filter used to hide content | | Object Streams | PDF objects stored in compressed streams | ## Tools & Systems | Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | peepdf / peepdf-3 | Interactive PDF analysis with JS emulation | | pdfid.py | Quick triage scanning for suspicious keywords | | pdf-parser.py | Deep object-level PDF parsing | | VirusTotal | Hash lookup and AV detection cross-reference | | CyberChef | Decode and transform extracted payloads | ## Output Format ``` Analysis Report: PDF-MAL-[DATE]-[SEQ] File: [filename.pdf] SHA-256: [hash] Suspicious Keywords: [/JS, /OpenAction, etc.] Objects with JavaScript: [Object IDs] Extracted URLs: [List] Shellcode Detected: [Yes/No] Embedded Files: [Count and types] VirusTotal Detections: [X/Y engines] Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low] ```
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
md5 = hashlib.md5()
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__analyzing-malicious-pdf-with-peepdf.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Analyzing Malicious Pdf With Peepdf skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Analyzing Malicious Pdf With Peepdf safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Analyzing Malicious Pdf With Peepdf access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.