Atlas / Skills / mukul975 / Analyzing Golang Malware With Ghidra

Analyzing Golang Malware With GhidraCAUTION

skills/mukul975/analyzing-golang-malware-with-ghidra

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Verdict
CAUTION
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.0
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
33,870
01

Overview

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Read from source at commit 6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07
02

Install

Commands as the repository documents them. They are shown, not run.

git clone https://github.com/volexity/GoResolver
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: analyzing-golang-malware-with-ghidra
description: Reverse engineer Go-compiled malware in Ghidra by parsing Go buildinfo
  and pclntab structures, recovering stripped/obfuscated function names (e.g. via
  GoResolver), and extracting embedded module/dependency strings and types from Go
  binaries. Use when analyzing a Go-language malware sample, deobfuscating a garble-packed
  Go binary, or recovering function names and third-party dependencies from a stripped
  Go executable.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: malware-analysis
tags:
- golang
- ghidra
- reverse-engineering
- malware-analysis
- binary-analysis
- go-malware
- disassembly
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- DE.AE-02
- RS.AN-03
- ID.RA-01
- DE.CM-01
mitre_attack:
- T1027
- T1620
- T1140
- T1059
---
# Analyzing Golang Malware with Ghidra

## Overview

Go (Golang) has become a popular language for malware authors due to its cross-compilation capabilities, static linking that produces self-contained binaries, and the complexity it introduces for reverse engineering. Go binaries contain the entire runtime, standard library, and all dependencies statically linked, resulting in large binaries (often 5-15MB) with thousands of functions. Ghidra struggles with Go-specific string formats (non-null-terminated), stripped function names, and goroutine concurrency patterns. Specialized tools like GoResolver (Volexity, 2025) use control-flow graph similarity to automatically deobfuscate and recover function names in stripped or obfuscated Go binaries.


## When to Use

- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing golang malware with ghidra
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques

## Prerequisites

- Ghidra 11.0+ with JDK 17+
- GoResolver plugin (for function name recovery)
- Go Reverse Engineering Tool Kit (go-re.tk)
- Python 3.9+ for helper scripts
- Understanding of Go runtime internals (goroutines, channels, interfaces)
- Familiarity with Go binary structure (pclntab, moduledata, itab)

## Key Concepts

### Go Binary Structure

Go binaries embed rich metadata in the `pclntab` (PC Line Table) structure, which maps program counters to function names, source files, and line numbers. Even stripped binaries retain this metadata. The `moduledata` structure contains pointers to type information, itabs (interface tables), and the pclntab itself. Go strings are stored as a pointer-length pair rather than null-terminated C strings.

### Function Recovery in Stripped Binaries

Despite stripping symbol tables, Go binaries retain function names within the pclntab. However, obfuscation tools like garble rename functions to random strings. GoResolver addresses this by computing control-flow graph signatures of obfuscated functions and matching them against a database of known Go standard library and third-party package functions.

### Crate/Dependency Extraction

Go's dependency management embeds module paths and version strings in the binary. Extracting these reveals the malware's third-party dependencies (HTTP libraries, encryption packages, C2 frameworks), which provides insight into capabilities without full reverse engineering.

## Workflow

### Step 1: Initial Binary Analysis

```python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Analyze Go binary metadata for malware analysis."""
import struct
import sys
import re


def find_go_build_info(data):
    """Extract Go build information from binary."""
    # Go buildinfo magic: \xff Go buildinf:
    magic = b'\xff Go buildinf:'
    offset = data.find(magic)
    if offset == -1:
        return None

    print(f"[+] Go build info at offset 0x{offset:x}")

    # Extract Go version string nearby
    go_version = re.search(rb'go\d+\.\d+(?:\.\d+)?', data[offset:offset+256])
    if go_version:
        print(f"  Go Version: {go_version.group().decode()}")

    return offset


def find_pclntab(data):
    """Locate the pclntab (PC Line Table) structure."""
    # pclntab magic bytes vary by Go version
    magics = {
        b'\xfb\xff\xff\xff\x00\x00': "Go 1.2-1.15",
        b'\xfa\xff\xff\xff\x00\x00': "Go 1.16-1.17",
        b'\xf1\xff\xff\xff\x00\x00': "Go 1.18-1.19",
        b'\xf0\xff\xff\xff\x00\x00': "Go 1.20+",
    }

    for magic, version in magics.items():
        offset = data.find(magic)
        if offset != -1:
            print(f"[+] pclntab found at 0x{offset:x} ({version})")
            return offset, version

    return None, None


def extract_function_names(data, pclntab_offset):
    """Extract function names from pclntab."""
    if pclntab_offset is None:
        return []

    functions = []
    # Function name strings follow specific patterns
    func_pattern = re.compile(
        rb'(?:main|runtime|fmt|net|os|crypto|encoding|io|sync|'
        rb'syscall|reflect|strings|bytes|path|time|math|sort|'
        rb'github\.com|golang\.org)[/\.][\w/.]+',
    )

    for match in func_pattern.finditer(data):
        name = match.group().decode('utf-8', errors='replace')
        if len(name) > 4 and len(name) < 200:
            functions.append(name)

    return sorted(set(functions))


def extract_go_strings(data):
    """Extract Go-style strings (pointer+length pairs)."""
    # Go strings are not null-terminated; extract readable sequences
    strings = []
    ascii_pattern = re.compile(rb'[\x20-\x7e]{10,}')

    for match in ascii_pattern.finditer(data):
        s = match.group().decode('ascii')
        # Filter for interesting malware strings
        interesting = [
            'http', 'https', 'tcp', 'udp', 'dns',
            'cmd', 'shell', 'exec', 'upload', 'download',
            'encrypt', 'decrypt', 'key', 'token', 'password',
            'c2', 'beacon', 'agent', 'implant', 'bot',
            'mutex', 'persist', 'registry', 'scheduled',
        ]
        if any(kw in s.lower() f
04

Trust audit

CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeWARN
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
declared (1 observation(s))
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (3)

MEDIUMPrivilege escalation / persistence · fs.persistence · CWE-269, CWE-250
scripts/process.py:75
rb'/etc/(?:passwd|shadow|crontab)',
MEDIUMFilesystem / path · fs.system_paths · CWE-22, CWE-59
scripts/process.py:75
rb'/etc/(?:passwd|shadow|crontab)',
INFOPrompt injection · scope.undeclared_system · CWE-94, CWE-1427
<declared scope>
system use found in code, not declared in the description
Why it matters. the description does not admit a capability the code has
Fix. declare system use in the description, or remove it

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-07 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__analyzing-golang-malware-with-ghidra.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-076c59587be632CAUTIONB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the Analyzing Golang Malware With Ghidra skill do?

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Is Analyzing Golang Malware With Ghidra safe to install?

With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 3 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.

What can Analyzing Golang Malware With Ghidra access on my machine?

The audit observed that it reads or writes files. Each of those is consistent with what it says it does. Secrets in the source: none found.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement