Atlas / Skills / mukul975 / Analyzing Command And Control Communication

Analyzing Command And Control CommunicationCAUTION

skills/mukul975/analyzing-command-and-control-communication

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Verdict
CAUTION
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.0.0
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
33,870
01

Overview

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Read from source at commit 6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: analyzing-command-and-control-communication
description: 'Analyzes malware C2 communication over HTTP, HTTPS, DNS, and custom
  protocols to reverse-engineer beacon patterns, command structures, data encoding,
  and infrastructure (primary servers, fallback domains, dead drops). Use after
  reverse engineering reveals network traffic needing protocol analysis or when
  building detection signatures for a framework like Cobalt Strike, Metasploit,
  or Sliver.

  '
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: malware-analysis
tags:
- malware
- C2
- command-and-control
- beacon
- protocol-analysis
version: 1.0.0
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- DE.AE-02
- RS.AN-03
- ID.RA-01
- DE.CM-01
mitre_attack:
- T1071.001
- T1573
- T1571
- T1008
- T1095
---

# Analyzing Command-and-Control Communication

## When to Use

- Reverse engineering a malware sample has revealed network communication that needs protocol analysis
- Building network-level detection signatures for a specific C2 framework (Cobalt Strike, Metasploit, Sliver)
- Mapping C2 infrastructure including primary servers, fallback domains, and dead drops
- Analyzing encrypted or encoded C2 traffic to understand the command set and data format
- Attributing malware to a threat actor based on C2 infrastructure patterns and tooling

**Do not use** for general network anomaly detection; this is specifically for understanding known or suspected C2 protocols from malware analysis.

## Prerequisites

- PCAP capture of malware network traffic (from sandbox, network tap, or full packet capture)
- Wireshark/tshark for packet-level analysis
- Reverse engineering tools (Ghidra, dnSpy) for understanding C2 code in the malware binary
- Python 3.8+ with `scapy`, `dpkt`, and `requests` for protocol analysis and replay
- Threat intelligence databases for C2 infrastructure correlation (VirusTotal, Shodan, Censys)
- JA3/JA3S fingerprint databases for TLS-based C2 identification

## Workflow

### Step 1: Identify the C2 Channel

Determine the protocol and transport used for C2 communication:

```
C2 Communication Channels:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
HTTP/HTTPS:     Most common; uses standard web traffic to blend in
                Indicators: Regular POST/GET requests, specific URI patterns, custom headers

DNS:            Tunneling data through DNS queries and responses
                Indicators: High-volume TXT queries, long subdomain names, high entropy

Custom TCP/UDP: Proprietary binary protocol on non-standard port
                Indicators: Non-HTTP traffic on high ports, unknown protocol

ICMP:           Data encoded in ICMP echo/reply payloads
                Indicators: ICMP packets with large or non-standard payloads

WebSocket:      Persistent bidirectional connection for real-time C2
                Indicators: WebSocket upgrade followed by binary frames

Cloud Services: Using legitimate APIs (Telegram, Discord, Slack, GitHub)
                Indicators: API calls to cloud services from unexpected processes

Email:          SMTP/IMAP for C2 commands and data exfiltration
                Indicators: Automated email operations from non-email processes
```

### Step 2: Analyze Beacon Pattern

Characterize the periodic communication pattern:

```python
from scapy.all import rdpcap, IP, TCP
from collections import defaultdict
import statistics
import json

packets = rdpcap("c2_traffic.pcap")

# Group TCP SYN packets by destination
connections = defaultdict(list)
for pkt in packets:
    if IP in pkt and TCP in pkt and (pkt[TCP].flags & 0x02):
        key = f"{pkt[IP].dst}:{pkt[TCP].dport}"
        connections[key].append(float(pkt.time))

# Analyze each destination for beaconing
for dst, times in sorted(connections.items()):
    if len(times) < 3:
        continue

    intervals = [times[i+1] - times[i] for i in range(len(times)-1)]
    avg_interval = statistics.mean(intervals)
    stdev = statistics.stdev(intervals) if len(intervals) > 1 else 0
    jitter_pct = (stdev / avg_interval * 100) if avg_interval > 0 else 0
    duration = times[-1] - times[0]

    beacon_data = {
        "destination": dst,
        "connections": len(times),
        "duration_seconds": round(duration, 1),
        "avg_interval_seconds": round(avg_interval, 1),
        "stdev_seconds": round(stdev, 1),
        "jitter_percent": round(jitter_pct, 1),
        "is_beacon": 5 < avg_interval < 7200 and jitter_pct < 25,
    }

    if beacon_data["is_beacon"]:
        print(f"[!] BEACON DETECTED: {dst}")
        print(f"    Interval: {avg_interval:.0f}s +/- {stdev:.0f}s ({jitter_pct:.0f}% jitter)")
        print(f"    Sessions: {len(times)} over {duration:.0f}s")
```

### Step 3: Decode C2 Protocol Structure

Reverse engineer the message format from captured traffic:

```python
# HTTP-based C2 protocol analysis
import dpkt
import base64

with open("c2_traffic.pcap", "rb") as f:
    pcap = dpkt.pcap.Reader(f)

for ts, buf in pcap:
    eth = dpkt.ethernet.Ethernet(buf)
    if not isinstance(eth.data, dpkt.ip.IP):
        continue
    ip = eth.data
    if not isinstance(ip.data, dpkt.tcp.TCP):
        continue
    tcp = ip.data

    if tcp.dport == 80 or tcp.dport == 443:
        if len(tcp.data) > 0:
            try:
                http = dpkt.http.Request(tcp.data)
                print(f"\n--- C2 REQUEST ---")
                print(f"Method: {http.method}")
                print(f"URI: {http.uri}")
                print(f"Headers: {dict(http.headers)}")
                if http.body:
                    print(f"Body ({len(http.body)} bytes):")
                    # Try Base64 decode
                    try:
                        decoded = base64.b64decode(http.body)
                        print(f"  Decoded: {decoded[:200]}")
                    except:
                        print(f"  Raw: {http.body[:200]}")
            except:
                pass
```

### Step 4: Identify C2 Framework

Match observed patterns to known C2 frameworks:

```
Known C2 Framework Signatu
03

Trust audit

CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeWARN
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
declared (6 observation(s))
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (6)

MEDIUMNetwork egress · net.beacon_words · CWE-200, CWE-319
scripts/agent.py:149
for beacon in beacons:
MEDIUMNetwork egress · net.beacon_words · CWE-200, CWE-319
scripts/agent.py:150
dst_ip, dst_port = beacon["destination"].rsplit(":", 1)
MEDIUMNetwork egress · net.beacon_words · CWE-200, CWE-319
scripts/agent.py:153
f'msg:"MALWARE Detected C2 Beacon to {dst_ip}:{dst_port}"; '
MEDIUMNetwork egress · net.beacon_words · CWE-200, CWE-319
scripts/agent.py:177
print("Beacon detection, protocol decoding, signature generation")
MEDIUMNetwork egress · net.beacon_words · CWE-200, CWE-319
scripts/agent.py:185
print("\n--- Beacon Detection ---")
LOWObfuscation / stealth · obf.decode_call · CWE-506, CWE-94
scripts/agent.py:81
decoded_body = base64.b64decode(http.body).decode("utf-8", errors="replace")

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-07 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__analyzing-command-and-control-communication.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-076c59587be632CAUTIONB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Analyzing Command And Control Communication skill do?

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Is Analyzing Command And Control Communication safe to install?

With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 6 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.

What can Analyzing Command And Control Communication access on my machine?

The audit observed that it reaches the network. Each of those is consistent with what it says it does. Secrets in the source: none found.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement