Teaching Lesson PlanCAUTION
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Overview
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
8d32d25aa3f5OBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: teaching-lesson-plan description: "Design a structured lesson plan for any subject, audience, or format. Use when asked to write a lesson plan, course outline, teaching session, workshop curriculum, or training module. Produces a complete lesson plan with learning objectives, activities, timing, assessment, and differentiation guidance." --- # Teaching Lesson Plan Skill Produces a complete, structured lesson plan for any subject, age group, or setting — from a one-hour corporate training to a full school lesson. Built around clear learning objectives, varied activities, and formative assessment. ## Required Inputs Work from what is given. If any of these is missing, still produce the complete output: fill each gap with a reasonable assumption marked *(assumed, confirm)* and list those assumptions at the end. Ask a question first only when the core subject itself is missing (there is nothing to write about). - **Subject or topic** - **Audience** (age group, experience level, group size) - **Session length** (30 / 45 / 60 / 90 / 120 minutes) - **Setting** (classroom / workshop / online / corporate training / one-to-one) - **Learning goal** (what should participants know or be able to do by the end?) - **Prior knowledge** (what can you assume they already know?) ## Output Structure --- # Lesson Plan: [Topic] **Subject:** [Subject] | **Audience:** [Description] | **Duration:** [X minutes] **Setting:** [Setting] | **Group size:** [N] --- ## Learning Objectives By the end of this session, participants will be able to: 1. [Objective 1 — use Bloom's taxonomy verbs: recall, explain, apply, analyse, evaluate, create] 2. [Objective 2] 3. [Objective 3 — maximum 3–4 objectives per session] **Key vocabulary:** [3–5 terms participants will need to know] --- ## Materials and Preparation - [ ] [Resource 1 — slides, handout, equipment] - [ ] [Resource 2] - [ ] Room setup: [configuration — rows / circles / tables / breakout spaces] --- ## Lesson Structure | Time | Phase | Activity | Format | |---|---|---|---| | [00:00] | Hook / Opener | [How you grab attention and establish relevance] | [Whole group / Individual / Pairs] | | [00:05] | Prior knowledge | [How you connect to what they already know] | [Discussion / Quiz / Think-pair-share] | | [00:15] | Instruction | [Direct teaching of new content] | [Explanation / Demo / Video] | | [00:30] | Guided practice | [Supported practice with feedback] | [Worked examples / Group task] | | [00:50] | Independent practice | [Students apply learning independently] | [Task / Problem / Discussion] | | [01:05] | Check for understanding | [Formative assessment] | [Exit ticket / Quiz / Q&A] | | [01:15] | Closure | [Summarise, connect to next session] | [Whole group] | --- ## Key Explanations and Worked Examples ### [Concept 1] [Clear explanation + one concrete worked example. Explain the concept the way a good teacher would — no jargon without definition, one idea at a time.] ### [Concept 2] [Explanation + example] --- ## Differentiation **For those who need more support:** - [Scaffold: e.g. sentence starters, worked examples, vocabulary cards] - [Modified task or reduced scope] **For those ready for a challenge:** - [Extension: e.g. apply to a new context, evaluate, create something] --- ## Formative Assessment (Check for Understanding) **During session:** - [Method 1: e.g. Cold calling with no-stakes approach, thumbs up/down, mini whiteboards] - [Method 2: e.g. Think-pair-share before moving on] **Exit ticket (last 5 minutes):** [One specific question that directly tests the learning objective — not "what did you enjoy?" but "solve this problem" or "explain this concept in your own words"] --- ## Common Misconceptions to Address | Misconception | Correct understanding | How to address it | |---|---|---| | [What learners often get wrong] | [The correct version] | [Specific activity or explanation] | --- ## Quality Checks - [ ] Learning objectives use action verbs (not "understand" or "know") - [ ] Session has a clear hook that establishes relevance - [ ] Activities are varied (not all listening) - [ ] Formative assessment checks the actual learning objective - [ ] Differentiation is specified for both support and extension - [ ] Timing adds up to session length ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not design a lesson plan without explicitly stating the learning objectives — activities must trace back to outcomes - [ ] Do not allocate timing that does not add up to the total session length — the plan must be time-feasible - [ ] Do not create activities with no assessment component — learning must be measurable, not just delivered - [ ] Do not ignore differentiation — a plan with no accommodation for different learning levels or abilities is incomplete - [ ] Do not front-load all content delivery without interactive breaks — passive listening degrades retention after 15–20 minutes ## Example Trigger Phrases - "Write a lesson plan on [topic] for [audience]" - "Design a 60-minute session on [subject]" - "Create a training module on [skill]" - "Plan a workshop on [topic] for [group]"
Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/discovery-interview-guide/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/job-story-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/user-interview-synthesis/SKILL.md
templates/pm-launch-agent/skills/content-calendar/SKILL.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
8d32d25aa3f5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mohitagw15856__teaching-lesson-plan.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 8d32d25aa3f5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Teaching Lesson Plan skill do?
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Is Teaching Lesson Plan safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Teaching Lesson Plan access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (8d32d25aa3f5), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.