Sop WriterCAUTION
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Overview
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
8d32d25aa3f5OBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: sop-writer
description: "Write a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for any operational task. Use when asked to write an SOP, standard operating procedure, work instruction, or operating manual. Produces a formal SOP with purpose, scope, procedure steps, quality checks, and version control."
---
# SOP Writer Skill
Produces formal, audit-ready SOPs suitable for regulated industries, ISO certification, or operational scaling.
> **Not quite this?** Use `cn-sop-writer` when it is a one-station shop-floor work instruction (作业指导书) for a factory.
## Required Inputs
- **SOP title** (e.g. "SOP-001: New Client Onboarding")
- **Department / function**
- **Process description**
- **Regulatory or quality standard** (ISO 9001, GMP, CQC, FCA, etc.)
- **Roles involved**
- **Tools or equipment used**
## Output Structure
---
**[COMPANY NAME] — Standard Operating Procedure**
| Document ID | [SOP-XXX] |
|---|---|
| Title | [Title] |
| Department | [Department] |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Effective date | [Date] |
| Review date | [Date] |
| Status | Draft / Under review / Approved |
---
### 1. Purpose
[1-2 sentences. Why does this SOP exist?]
### 2. Scope
**Applies to:** [Roles, departments, locations]
**Does not apply to:** [Explicit exclusions]
### 3. Definitions
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| [Term] | [Plain English definition] |
### 4. Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| [Role] | [Specific responsibility] |
### 5. Required Materials / Tools / Access
- [Item]
### 6. Procedure
| Step | Action | Responsible | Record/Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.1.1 | [Imperative action: "Open [system] and navigate to [location]"] | [Role] | [What to record] |
NOTE: Steps must be written in imperative form. Each step must have one action only.
### 7. Quality Checks
| Check point | What to verify | Pass criteria | If fail |
|---|---|---|---|
| [After step X] | [What to check] | [What good looks like] | [What to do] |
### 8. Non-Conformance
1. [Immediate action]
2. [Who to notify]
3. [How to document deviation]
### 9. References
[Related SOPs, policies, standards]
### 10. Document History
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | [Date] | [Name] | Initial release |
## Quality Checks
- [ ] All steps written in imperative form ("Open...", "Navigate...", "Confirm...")
- [ ] Each step has exactly one action
- [ ] Role specified for every step
- [ ] Quality checkpoints at critical stages
- [ ] Non-conformance process defines who to notify and how to document
- [ ] Document history table and review date are included
## Example Trigger Phrases
- "Write an SOP for [process]"
- "Create a standard operating procedure for [task]"
- "Write a work instruction for [process]"
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not write steps that contain more than one action — each step must be a single, auditable action in imperative form
- [ ] Do not omit a role from any step — every action must be assigned to a specific role or the SOP cannot be enforced
- [ ] Do not skip the non-conformance section — an SOP without a deviation process cannot meet audit or regulatory requirements
- [ ] Do not produce an SOP without a review date and version history — undated documents cannot be relied upon for compliance
- [ ] Do not use passive voice in procedure steps — write "Open the system" not "The system should be opened"Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/discovery-interview-guide/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/job-story-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/user-interview-synthesis/SKILL.md
templates/pm-launch-agent/skills/content-calendar/SKILL.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
8d32d25aa3f5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mohitagw15856__sop-writer.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 8d32d25aa3f5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Sop Writer skill do?
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Is Sop Writer safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Sop Writer access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (8d32d25aa3f5), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.